Nobody thought that but floyd fans after he made it up.seemorecizzy said:i'm not trying to convince you breh
we can agree to disagree
im just showing you why a lot of people thought manny was using
its more than what you stating
the way he moved up in weight classes
not taking random tests
wantinf specific dates on when people would come in to test
stuttering and not making sense when asked about it in interviews
him (or his boss) saying hes scared of needles
shane mosley alluding to the fact that pacquaio might be on the same undectable PED'S he was on etc
if you don't agree fine, just saying the shyt looks suspect![]()
Nobody thought that but floyd fans after he made it up.
Fight has a no rematch clause. This is a one and done fight like how it should be. Bring all your guns to the table the 1st time with no excuses if you lose.This ain't gonna be no knockout.This could be a split decision.Cause the rematch will be even bigger![]()
Fight has a no rematch clause. This is a one and done fight like how it should be. Bring all your guns to the table the 1st time with no excuses if you lose.
Look it up then homie, its all over the placekinda of this this is false. They want to sell has much PPV as they can. So of course they going to say no rematch clause to make you think this won't ever happen again.
There isn't a rematch clause, but all that means is that neither fighter can compel the other to a rematch if they lose. That doesn't mean that there will definitely be only one fight. They could easily agree to a second fight later this year if they felt like it. Don't need a rematch clause to have a rematch.Look it up then homie, its all over the place

and nothing was found, or do you believe Arum pays off the feds too?http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/10/s...ials-dispute-allegations-of-fixed-fights.html
had enough probable cause to get a warrant![]()

Ditto...if the fight is close or a goat level brawl/classic fight or floyd loses...best believe they will run that backThere isn't a rematch clause, but all that means is that neither fighter can compel the other to a rematch if they lose. That doesn't mean that there will definitely be only one fight. They could easily agree to a second fight later this year if they felt like it. Don't need a rematch clause to have a rematch.
I get your point, but the no rematch clause was signed by both parties on the contract. If that is the case then this is a one and done. Floyd only has like 2 more fights on his Showtime contract and I know he is not going to waste them all on Manny. This is just a 1 fight deal so you have to get it right on May 2nd or elseThere isn't a rematch clause, but all that means is that neither fighter can compel the other to a rematch if they lose. That doesn't mean that there will definitely be only one fight. They could easily agree to a second fight later this year if they felt like it. Don't need a rematch clause to have a rematch.
Don't see it, not with Floyd being 38 and about to retire. All he needs to do is give the fans what they want, and that is a fight with Pac. No need to risk anything of a fighter of his calibur after 1 fight. The contract states it is a no rematch clause. Both parties sign and that is that. Remember they are not spring chickens no more and both know the risks. Rematches dilute feuds in my opinion. You know what u need to do the first fight to win, so do it thenDitto...if the fight is close or a goat level brawl/classic fight or floyd loses...best believe they will run that back