paradoxes that fukk your brain up

The Guru

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
9,961
Reputation
2,850
Daps
35,159
Reppin
NULL
Time dilation - The faster you travel the more time slows down for you. If you traveled to the nearest star at the 99.99% speed of light and returned to earth it would take you 8 years on earth time. For you only 130 days would pass. Everyone you know would be 8 years older. You would be the same.
The fact that the speed of light is so central to reality disturbs me.

But as an object approaches the speed of light, its observed mass becomes infinitely large. As a result, an infinite amount of energy is required to make an object move at the speed of light. For this reason, it is impossible for any matter to travel faster than light speed.

This, combined with the fact space-time itself is expanding faster than the speed of light, thus parts of the universe are moving an unreachable distance away from us. Just based on limited human intiution, It feels intentional.
 

Artfull Dodger

All Star
Joined
Jul 20, 2012
Messages
2,302
Reputation
1,825
Daps
7,936


Basically I'm complicated:troll:

I have a hard time taking the easy way.....:jbhmm:

It's deep how you can be so shallow:picard:,
An I'm afraid coz I have no fear.............:lupe:


You see, everybody is somebody
But nobody wants to be themselves
Ooh. And if I ever wanted to ever understand me, I'd have to talk to someone else

:banderas:
 

MischievousMonkey

Gor bu dëgër
Joined
Jun 5, 2018
Messages
19,646
Reputation
8,348
Daps
95,853
so is it like gollum/smegle type thoughts
200w.gif

or like this



"bud light keeps it coming"

:ehh:

Neither

It's truly non-verbal. It's hard to explain because on my hand I don't understand very well how an internal speech is supposed to work since I don't think I have it.

I'd describe it as seeing or knowing. When you see a red book, do you have an internal voice that tells you "the book is red"? I assume you don't, you just know it is red.

Well not having an internal speech is akin to that. Thoughts are not worded out internally (or rather worded in). They can definitely be visual though or even appear in written form but now I'm not sure if that is just often or always the case.
 
  • Dap
Reactions: MMS

MMS

Intensity Integrity Intelligence
Staff member
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
27,368
Reputation
4,125
Daps
32,655
Reppin
Auburn, AL
Neither

It's truly non-verbal. It's hard to explain because on my hand I don't understand very well how an internal speech is supposed to work since I don't think I have it.

I'd describe it as seeing or knowing. When you see a red book, do you have an internal voice that tells you "the book is red"? I assume you don't, you just know it is red.

Well not having an internal speech is akin to that. Thoughts are not worded out internally (or rather worded in). They can definitely be visual though or even appear in written form but now I'm not sure if that is just often or always the case.
ok well animals brains actually work like that

it was said by researchers that a squirrel in the forest would take snapshots of its surroundings to remember where its den was and where its hidden food were. So for some reason it would glimpse in three different directions and then make a decision

you say "i can look at a red book and decide its red"

when people put internal monologue with thinking it isnt because they are judging something based on its characteristics, they are having an internal conversation about the things around them.

so just judging something isnt exactly the same as thinking.

So do people with no internal monologues, judge only? unless they are speaking out loud? :dahell: hold your nose closed next time you actively think

200.gif
 

MischievousMonkey

Gor bu dëgër
Joined
Jun 5, 2018
Messages
19,646
Reputation
8,348
Daps
95,853
ok well animals brains actually work like that

it was said by researchers that a squirrel in the forest would take snapshots of its surroundings to remember where its den was and where its hidden food were. So for some reason it would glimpse in three different directions and then make a decision

you say "i can look at a red book and decide its red"

when people put internal monologue with thinking it isnt because they are judging something based on its characteristics, they are having an internal conversation about the things around them.

so just judging something isnt exactly the same as thinking.

So do people with no internal monologues, judge only? unless they are speaking out loud? :dahell: hold your nose closed next time you actively think

200.gif
Maybe I'm tripping and I do have internal monologue.

For example, when I read your last sentence, I thought ":childplease: No, I'm not about to do that". Like, that exact sentence popped out in my mind. But I don't feel like I have an internal voice that said the sentence. It's like the sentence popped out raw.

But I don't need internal sentences to have structured abstract thoughts.

I think it's just a different way of thinking, on a spectrum. Just like aphantasia is a different way of processing information. People with aphantasia will read novels and register information as a collection of facts. They can't "imagine" in the sense of internally "seeing" pictures. People without aphantasia can read words and see images pop up in their mind, and even among people that see images, their ability can differ greatly from person to person (some can vaguely see shyt and other can precisely look at details of complex pictures in their minds).

The internal monologue thing reminds me of aphantasia, but for sounds. A spectrum of how much people internally "verbalize" their thoughts.

Or maybe there are verbal thinkers (people who internally sound out every thought) and visual ones (people who internally see their thoughts).

Your turn tho: everytime when you're driving and see the light turn red, do you have a voice in your head that tells you "oh shyt, gotta stop now. Ok, now it's green, I can go"?

Having a voice in my head sounding out every thought sounds like a nightmare :heh:
 
  • Haha
Reactions: MMS

MMS

Intensity Integrity Intelligence
Staff member
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
27,368
Reputation
4,125
Daps
32,655
Reppin
Auburn, AL
Maybe I'm tripping and I do have internal monologue.

For example, when I read your last sentence, I thought ":childplease: No, I'm not about to do that". Like, that exact sentence popped out in my mind. But I don't feel like I have an internal voice that said the sentence. It's like the sentence popped out raw.

But I don't need internal sentences to have structured abstract thoughts.

I think it's just a different way of thinking, on a spectrum. Just like aphantasia is a different way of processing information. People with aphantasia will read novels and register information as a collection of facts. They can't "imagine" in the sense of internally "seeing" pictures. People without aphantasia can read words and see images pop up in their mind, and even among people that see images, their ability can differ greatly from person to person (some can vaguely see shyt and other can precisely look at details of complex pictures in their minds).

The internal monologue thing reminds me of aphantasia, but for sounds. A spectrum of how much people internally "verbalize" their thoughts.

Or maybe there are verbal thinkers (people who internally sound out every thought) and visual ones (people who internally see their thoughts).

Your turn tho: everytime when you're driving and see the light turn red, do you have a voice in your head that tells you "oh shyt, gotta stop now. Ok, now it's green, I can go"?

Having a voice in my head sounding out every thought sounds like a nightmare :heh:
its an example of a habitual thought

habitual thoughts are ones we collect and store in tightly packed ways so that when we see it again we can process it faster

this is also the phenomena that makes you feel like the things of the past had more significance than the things in the present

its the brains natural way of taking a previous experience and reducing it to make room for "possible" new experiences

i forget where i read/watched on it but it was good. Because of the way we store memories as we age we are more likely to feed the "habitualizing" sequence than the "savoring" sequence of first experience

kinda like your first time going raw vs 10th anniversary sex

https://genius.com/Ol-dirty-b*stard-shimmy-shimmy-ya-extended-version-2020-remaster-lyrics

im trying to savor the flavor
 
Last edited:

MischievousMonkey

Gor bu dëgër
Joined
Jun 5, 2018
Messages
19,646
Reputation
8,348
Daps
95,853
:heh:its an example of a habitual thought

habitual thoughts are ones we collect and store in tightly packed ways so that when we see it again we can process it faster

this is also the phenomena that makes you feel like the things of the past had more significance than the things in the present

its the brains natural way of taking a previous experience and reducing it to make room for "possible" new experiences

i forget where i read/watched on it but it was good. Because of the way we store memories as we age we are more likely to feed the "habitualizing" sequence than the "savoring" sequence of first experience

kinda like your first time going raw vs 10th anniversary sex


im trying to savor the flavor

You might have read it from Thinking Fast and Slow by Daniel Kahneman. It's such a fascinating book even though the replication crisis in the field of psychology kinda soured my appreciation of it.

The way people don't need to think slow for habitual actions could be compared to how I feel about most thinking operations I guess. It misses the mark a little bit though, in my opinion. I think the idea of a spectrum (where thoughts are more or less spelled out) and visualization (images, even abstract ones, rather than sounds) fits more accurately my experience. I probably do a little bit of sounding out (even though it feels more like writing my thoughts than saying them internally) combined with a whole lot of visuals and fast thinking.

Recently I found myself trying to spell out my thoughts more and have this internal dialog when I play board games and I want to plan several steps ahead and I must admit that it helps :ehh: even though the experience is still inconclusive for now
 
  • Dap
Reactions: MMS

MMS

Intensity Integrity Intelligence
Staff member
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
27,368
Reputation
4,125
Daps
32,655
Reppin
Auburn, AL
You might have read it from Thinking Fast and Slow by Daniel Kahneman. It's such a fascinating book even though the replication crisis in the field of psychology kinda soured my appreciation of it.

The way people don't need to think slow for habitual actions could be compared to how I feel about most thinking operations I guess. It misses the mark a little bit though, in my opinion. I think the idea of a spectrum (where thoughts are more or less spelled out) and visualization (images, even abstract ones, rather than sounds) fits more accurately my experience. I probably do a little bit of sounding out (even though it feels more like writing my thoughts than saying them internally) combined with a whole lot of visuals and fast thinking.

Recently I found myself trying to spell out my thoughts more and have this internal dialog when I play board games and I want to plan several steps ahead and I must admit that it helps :ehh: even though the experience is still inconclusive for now
this is exactly how i think many times

where internally i decide why im interested in something then justify it with internal debate

but its not really a game

giphy.gif


i forget which philosopher said it but it went along the lines of "The sign of intelligence is the ability to entertain a thot without fully accepting it"
stock-vector-hand-drawn-doodle-water-chemical-formula-icon-vector-illustration-cartoon-molecule-element-730879759.jpg

 
Last edited:
Top