Pat Riley's Thoughts On NBA 'Superteams'

CSquare43

Superstar
Joined
Jun 7, 2012
Messages
14,881
Reputation
10,318
Daps
53,774
Pat Riley has an interesting idea about how to fix the NBA's 'superteam' problem

"I believe that there should be a franchise tag on one of your guys. My opinion of a franchise tag — this is why they don't allow me to talk and give opinions in the collective bargaining agreement — is that a franchise player to me would be a player in which you can pay him as much money as you want.

"It doesn't go against the cap. Everybody gets one player, that Kevin [Durant] you get 50 [million], LeBron you get 100 [million]. Somewhere along the way there are players in this league that are worth that kind of money. Or there's a limit on that. But if you franchise somebody then you have the ability to protect [against your star player leaving for a super team.]"

:ehh:
 

Mantis Toboggan M.D.

I’m here for the scraps
Joined
Mar 18, 2014
Messages
33,751
Reputation
10,059
Daps
111,554
Reppin
Brooklyn
He reads the coli :ehh:

My only amendment would be that it could only apply to the team who drafted you
Nah this is something that should simply be applicable to a guy who is on the team and you have bird rights to. I've been saying for a while this is something he NFL should add to improve the quality of the league. Every team could designate one contract at a time on the team that doesn't count against the cap. Glad an executive in a sport is saying the same thing. We would see stars get huge money and it wouldn't clog up cap space. In theory this should work.
 

FaTaL

Veteran
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
106,931
Reputation
5,539
Daps
212,770
Reppin
NULL
Nah this is something that should simply be applicable to a guy who is on the team and you have bird rights to. I've been saying for a while this is something he NFL should add to improve the quality of the league. Every team could designate one contract at a time on the team that doesn't count against the cap. Glad an executive in a sport is saying the same thing. We would see stars get huge money and it wouldn't clog up cap space. In theory this should work.
That's terrible for the player, what if you stuck in sh!tty situation with no way out?
 

SchoolboyC

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Feb 27, 2014
Messages
25,290
Reputation
4,785
Daps
107,676
Nah this is something that should simply be applicable to a guy who is on the team and you have bird rights to. I've been saying for a while this is something he NFL should add to improve the quality of the league. Every team could designate one contract at a time on the team that doesn't count against the cap. Glad an executive in a sport is saying the same thing. We would see stars get huge money and it wouldn't clog up cap space. In theory this should work.

What happens when a team designates a franchise player and then uses the remaining cap space to sign other star(s)?
 
Top