Exactly, imagine that happened to lebron with the first carnation of the cavs.That's terrible for the player, what if you stuck in sh!tty situation with no way out?
He'd still be ringless with moe williams as the second option
Exactly, imagine that happened to lebron with the first carnation of the cavs.That's terrible for the player, what if you stuck in sh!tty situation with no way out?
You don't have to sign. They could simply offer a shytload more. His theory didn't say anything about restricting the player movement. Just incentivizing them to stay. Ultimately it'd still be the choice of the player.That's terrible for the player, what if you stuck in sh!tty situation with no way out?
Then they might end up capped out or stacked, but it still takes great management to put a great team together.What happens when a team designates a franchise player and then uses the remaining cap space to sign other star(s)?
Cavs didn't break GSW if anything they are like the Mavs when they beat the Heat and that dominance might now just starting.that would actually work... but would take the fun out of shear dominance and breaking the dominance out of the game.
like spurs did heat..
like cavs did GSW


Funny how he insinuates Lebron is twice as good as Durant there![]()
He basically said each team could keep their superstar, which means trap their superstarYou don't have to sign. They could simply offer a shytload more. His theory didn't say anything about restricting the player movement. Just incentivizing them to stay. Ultimately it'd still be the choice of the player.
Doesn't sound like a complaint to me. Somebody asked him a question and he answered it with something he's advocated for in the past. If what he said were to happen, Wade would still be in Miami.Man who started it all is now complaining
They still can leave.. They just will be turning down mad moneyHe basically said each team could keep their superstar, which means trap their superstar

