Pedos want the same rights as gays (ART)

Mowgli

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
100,898
Reputation
13,026
Daps
238,126
Minors are not deemed old enough to be held accountable for their decisions.

How the hell is that analogous to two consenting adults having gay sex, besides the fact that you happen to find both of them disgusting?

Not deemed by who? Clearly not these demons. The laws for this vary around the world. Whos right? Fall back. Its a preference and these homos and perverts are in league together. How many boys get abused every year............thats the gay community. They would love to see consent laws changed in this country and with a demonic lobby and blood money, God only knows the demonic ramifications this seed has just planted in our culture. You gay rights activists have crumbled the morality in this nation to become be cousin of institutional racism. Demonically institionalized perversion. :snoop:
 

714562

Superstar
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
7,767
Reputation
1,620
Daps
17,471
Well, when it comes to sexual attraction they are the same. Its a deviant attraction between consenting adults (besides the pedos, obviously). There is 0 justification for opposing incestual marriages while supporting homosexual marriage, provided that the man is sterilized or they can't otherwise have children together.

Except this argument is retarded for two reasons.

1) "Incest" is not a sexual orientation. If the law bans gay sex, gay people can't have sex lives. AT ALL. If the law says you can't bang your sister, you literally have millions of other options. All you need to do is leave the house.

2) Unlike monogamous homosexual relations, incest actually DOES destroy the family. If you forbid sex between these two men, neither of them is likely to form a happy hetero unit. So the best course of action is for them to marry each other and divide mommy/daddy roles between themselves. Now, think about all the bridges you've burned between yourself and your friends by having sex with them. I'll give you a minute. Got it? Okay. Now imagine doing that WITHIN YOUR FAMILY. Yeah. THAT'LL destroy a family unit really, really quickly.
 

Metta World Movement

Peace and love...to all!!
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
6,417
Reputation
-46
Daps
11,510
Not deemed by who? Clearly not these demons. The laws for this vary around the world. Whos right? Fall back. Its a preference and these homos and perverts are in league together. How many boys get abused every year............thats the gay community.

:comeon:

So what's the 'league' that has all the nasty grown-ass nikkas who fukk little girls? Explain how that shyt has anything to do with gay people
 

Mowgli

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
100,898
Reputation
13,026
Daps
238,126
:comeon:

So what's the 'league' that has all the nasty grown-ass nikkas who fukk little girls? Explain how that shyt has anything to do with gay people
I dont know. You tell me :dwillhuh:

I thought we were talking about guys here.
 

Dirty_Jerz

Ethiop
Joined
May 12, 2012
Messages
12,602
Reputation
-825
Daps
11,374
Reppin
the evils of truth, and love
Except this argument is retarded for two reasons.

1) "Incest" is not a sexual orientation. If the law bans gay sex, gay people can't have sex lives. AT ALL. If the law says you can't bang your sister, you literally have millions of other options. All you need to do is leave the house.

2) Unlike monogamous homosexual relations, incest actually DOES destroy the family. If you forbid sex between these two men, neither of them is likely to form a happy hetero unit. So the best course of action is for them to marry each other and divide mommy/daddy roles between themselves. Now, think about all the bridges you've burned between yourself and your friends by having sex with them. I'll give you a minute. Got it? Okay. Now imagine doing that WITHIN YOUR FAMILY. Yeah. THAT'LL destroy a family unit really, really quickly.



so banning gay sex means gay people cant have sex? they just have to go outside like the incestuous and have sex with someone of the opposite sex


and homosexual sex doesnt destroy families?

how about true homosexuals dont ever have kids and they are slowly killing off their bloodlines by not making any more babies :usure:


Linda Harvey, of Mission America, said the push for pedophiles to have equal rights will become more and more common as LGBT groups continue to assert themselves. “It’s all part of a plan to introduce sex to children at younger and younger ages; to convince them that normal friendship is actually a sexual attraction.”

Milton Diamond, a University of Hawaii professor and director of the Pacific Center for Sex and Society, stated that child pornography could be beneficial to society because, “Potential sex offenders use child pornography as a substitute for sex against children.”

Diamond is a distinguished lecturer for the Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Sexuality in San Francisco. The IASHS openly advocated for the repeal of the Revolutionary war ban on homosexuals serving in the military.

The IASHS lists, on its website, a list of “basic sexual rights” that includes “the right to engage in sexual acts or activities of any kind whatsoever, providing they do not involve nonconsensual acts, violence, constraint, coercion or fraud.” Another right is to, “be free of persecution, condemnation, discrimination, or societal intervention in private sexual behavior” and “the freedom of any sexual thought, fantasy or desire.” The organization also says that no one should be “disadvantaged because of age.”

Sex offender laws protecting children have been challenged in several states including California, Georgia and Iowa. Sex offenders claim the laws prohibiting them from living near schools or parks are unfair because it penalizes them for life.



got dam been tryin to tell nikkas its only a matter of time :ohlawd: nobody aint wanna believe it though
 

Mowgli

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
100,898
Reputation
13,026
Daps
238,126
so banning gay sex means gay people cant have sex? they just have to go outside like the incestuous and have sex with someone of the opposite sex


and homosexual sex doesnt destroy families?

how about true homosexuals dont ever have kids and they are slowly killing off their bloodlines by not making any more babies :usure:






got dam been tryin to tell nikkas its only a matter of time :ohlawd: nobody aint wanna believe it though

Thats a professor talking. :merchant: These demons have every intellectual excuse for their demonic ways. Wow. All they need is a lobby with capital and we have problems. Sadly, you'll be considered a maniac in this Demonic Age for fighting these types of people. :merchant:
 

714562

Superstar
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
7,767
Reputation
1,620
Daps
17,471
so banning gay sex means gay people cant have sex? they just have to go outside like the incestuous and have sex with someone of the opposite sex

...I'm going to explain this again, because clearly you don't get it.

Incest is not an orientation. When you say, "I want to have sex with my sister" it's not the same as a man saying, " I prefer having sex with men." The former is a heterosexual man who, for whatever reason, has a fantasy about fukking this ONLY THIS ONE person. Having a sexual fantasy about incest does not an "orientation" make. You outlaw incest, and he can still have a sex life.

For people who identify as homosexual, "gay" is not a fantasy. It's not mutable. Gay people are gay. They have sex with other gay people.

and homosexual sex doesnt destroy families?

No. It doesn't. Because gay people who want to get married aren't exactly going to have happy straight lives, are they?

how about true homosexuals dont ever have kids and they are slowly killing off their bloodlines by not making any more babies :usure:

Because it's not like plenty of straight couples choose not to have babies and destroy their bloodlines, right? :mindblown:


Are you trolling or are you actually an idiot?
 

Mountain

All Star
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
4,121
Reputation
730
Daps
8,671
Reppin
more money
Except this argument is retarded for two reasons.

1) "Incest" is not a sexual orientation. If the law bans gay sex, gay people can't have sex lives. AT ALL. If the law says you can't bang your sister, you literally have millions of other options. All you need to do is leave the house.

Ridiculous, the fact that options are available alone does not justify the fact that it's illegal.

With that line of thinking the government could ban people driving red cars for no reason other than the fact that there are other colors available and you'll be OK with it.

2) Unlike monogamous homosexual relations, incest actually DOES destroy the family. If you forbid sex between these two men, neither of them is likely to form a happy hetero unit. So the best course of action is for them to marry each other and divide mommy/daddy roles between themselves. Now, think about all the bridges you've burned between yourself and your friends by having sex with them. I'll give you a minute. Got it? Okay. Now imagine doing that WITHIN YOUR FAMILY. Yeah. THAT'LL destroy a family unit really, really quickly.

What you're saying is akin to me saying that "transsexualism should be illegal because it may break families part", perhaps you believe alcohol should be illegal as well because it can destroy families?


What, you're not even going to explain why you disagree with his point of view? "Higher learning" my ass, this is why I rarely post here.

Agree. A better comparison is homosexuality and incest.

Lets play devils advocate here. One can also compare homosexuality and bestiality given the context of implicit compliance.

The social and legal objection in regards to bestiality is based on the so-called "barrier of communication between man and beast", even though implicit consent clearly transcends that barrier.

An example would be an animal initiating sexual intercourse whilst the human consents. In such an instance the animal is not forced against its will and the human in question has also complied to the advance, clearly there is no violation of rights taking place against either party.

Regardless of the latter, the law objects to all forms of bestiality for the same ethical reasons that were used to outlaw homosexuality in the past, and liberals say nothing.

Now, im in no way for bestiality, incest, homosexuality .e.t.c. because i think all of that sht is sick and dangerous, but I understand the essential nature of liberalism, and I know that liberals promote equal rights for all provided there is no harm done (at least pretend to).
 

I.AM.PIFF

You're minor, we're major
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
13,107
Reputation
11,670
Daps
40,742
Thats a professor talking. :merchant: These demons have every intellectual excuse for their demonic ways. Wow. All they need is a lobby with capital and we have problems. Sadly, you'll be considered a maniac in this Demonic Age for fighting these types of people. :merchant:

Truly demonic, friend.

They're noteven hiding it anymore :snoop:
 

Mowgli

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
100,898
Reputation
13,026
Daps
238,126
Truly demonic, friend.

They're noteven hiding it anymore :snoop:

They're using the law to avoid really talking about the issue. WHen the law is no longer a barrier they'll just say *well, its legal. Psychologists said its ok* Its so demonic. :dwillhuh:
 

I.AM.PIFF

You're minor, we're major
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
13,107
Reputation
11,670
Daps
40,742
I feel you breh.

What's next ? Rapist & child molesters lobbying for their rights ? Cause they can't help it and are born this way ?

Stop it, it's discusting :pacspit:
 

Hiphoplives4eva

Solid Gold Dashikis
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
42,423
Reputation
3,890
Daps
152,068
Reppin
black love, unity, and music
It is a sexual orientation. Just one that is illegal. The difference is that homosexuality happens between consenting adults (except cases of rape obviously) while paedophilia happens between an adult and someone who is under the legal age of consent, and thus considered to being abused. So it's really not a discussion: as long as there is an age of consent, it is illegal. (We can discuss about what that age of consent should be, or about how different can a 19 year-old be from a 17 year-old, or about the logic of the age of consent being different across bordering countries, but that's maybe besides the point).

So taking that angle is stupid, as well as those who will claim that this is the homosexual's fault. This falls right into the accusations of homosexuals being paedophiles, and vice-versa.


Well at one time sodomy was considered illegal, yet many people still engaged in the practice behind closed doors. So if something being illegal is your only defense against pedophilia then the pedophilia lovers have a valid point.
 
Top