People Prefer Vaccination Advice From Random Internet Commenters (Rather Than, Say, Experts)

tmonster

Superstar
Joined
Nov 26, 2013
Messages
17,900
Reputation
3,205
Daps
31,792
All the people( scientists, doctors, journalists, parents) talking bad about vaccines are liars and crisis actors according to @tmonster. Not one lick of evidence he brings forward to dispute the claim but hey trolls don't bring evidence.
you're a crisis actor!
cyZhcMn.gif
 
Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Messages
39,797
Reputation
-235
Daps
65,127
Reppin
NULL
Immune Booster...article doesn't say anything about dead viruses

http://www.health.harvard.edu/staying-healthy/how-to-boost-your-immune-system

Breast Milk is the key for newborns life immune system, not vaccines.

From wikipedia...

Health authorities consider human breast milk the healthiest diet for babies, as opposed to infant formula.[2] Breastfeeding promotes health of both mother and infant and helps prevent disease. Infants who are not breastfed are at a significantly increased risk for a large number of acute and chronic diseases including lower respiratory infection, ear infections, bacteremia, bacterial meningitis, botulism, urinary tract infection, and necrotizing enterocolitis.[30] They state that there are a number of studies that show a possible protective effect of breast milk feeding against sudden infant death syndrome, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis,lymphoma, allergic diseases, digestive diseases, and a possible enhancement of cognitive development.


http://www.jaoa.osteopathic.org/content/106/4/203.full

Breastfeeding provides unsurpassed natural nutrition to the newborn and infant. Human breast milk also contains numerous protective factors against infectious disease and may influence immune system development, In addition to being the best source of nutrition for newborns and infants, human breast milk also provides immunologic protection against many infections.1,2 Although most of the immunologic benefit cited by researchers relates to protection from diarrheal diseases that are especially prevalent in developing countries,2,3 breastfeeding has also been shown to protect infants against extraintestinal infections, such as otitis media46 and respiratory diseases.710.

Immunologic Factors in Human Breast Milk
For the fetus and newborn, immunologic defenses are present, but immature. To compensate, the mother's immunoglobulin (Ig) G antibody moves across the placental barrier to provide some protection. After birth, these maternal antibodies wane in the first 6 to 12 months of human life. The neonate and infant can receive additional maternal protection from breast milk, however.

Human breast milk contains large quantities of secretory Ig A (sIgA). These antibodies, which have formed as a consequence of the mother's previous exposure to infectious agents, can bind to potential pathogens and prevent their attachment to the infant's cells. Secretory IgA is adapted to survive in the respiratory and gastrointestinal mucosal membranes and resist proteolytic digestion. Secretory IgA neutralizes infectious agents while at the same time limiting the damaging effects of tissue inflammation that can occur with other antibody types.

Human breast milk, and especially the early colostrum, contains measurable levels of leukocytes. Colostrum contains approximately 5×106 cells per mL, an amount that decreases tenfold in mature milk. Most of these leukocytes are macrophages and neutrophils, which phagocytose microbial pathogens. Lymphocytes, including T cells, natural killer cells, and antibody-producing B cells, make up 10% of the leukocytes in human breast milk. There is evidence to suggest that these cells survive passage through the infant's gastrointestinal system where they are absorbed and influence the infant's immune response.11 Much of this evidence comes from animal studies, however, which will be discussed later in the present review.

In addition to these immunologic components, breast milk contains several nonspecific factors that have antimicrobial effects.12 These factors include the enzyme lysozyme, which inhibits the growth of many bacterial species by disrupting the proteoglycan layer of the bacterial cell wall. Lactoferrin, one of the most abundant proteins in human milk, also limits bacterial growth by removing essential iron. Nucleotides in human milk have been shown to enhance immune function in infants.13 Complex sugars are found only in trace amounts in cow milk but make up a substantial portion of human milk sugars, where they may prevent adherence of various microbial pathogens by acting as decoy receptors.11

Breastfeeding and Childhood Vaccination
It has also been suggested that breastfeeding influences an infant's response to common childhood vaccinations.2,3 Several studies have shown increased immune response to vaccines in breastfed vs formula-fed babies.18,19 Greenberg and colleagues20 studied immune responses to Haemophilus influenzae type b-tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine in a subset of 10,000 immunized infants and found a significant increase in antivaccine antibody in infants that had been breastfed for at least 6 months. Other studies21,22 have found no such positive effects, however. Still others have even found a significant adverse effect on seroconversion.23

Studies showing no effect or adverse effects of breastfeeding in childhood vaccinations often used live viral vaccines whose immunogenicity may be inhibited by the sIgA of human breast milk. For example, the three studies included in the meta-analysis by Pichichero,23 with approximately 500 infants in total, all examined antirotaviral responses after an oral dose of a live attenuated Rotavirus vaccine. Proper immunization with live oral virus vaccines depends upon viral replication, which could be inhibited by the sIgA of breast milk. Indeed, increasing the vaccine dose diminished the “adverse” effect of breastfeeding.23
 

Type Username Here

Not a new member
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
16,368
Reputation
2,400
Daps
32,646
Reppin
humans
This dude ignores how many children died at childbirth or in early stages of life due to diseases. It was very common (and is still common in a lot of the world where vaccine is not present).

Breast Milk sure saved them.
 
Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Messages
39,797
Reputation
-235
Daps
65,127
Reppin
NULL
This dude ignores how many children died at childbirth or in early stages of life due to diseases. It was very common (and is still common in a lot of the world where vaccine is not present).

Breast Milk sure saved them.

You can address me homie, stop acting like you scared. No one is ignoring those stats. What you are trying to say is every child would survive early child birth and disease to vaccines from some made-up science stats from the CDC. Impossible. Children die at birth isn't some unexplained phenomenon. It happens. You do ignore the outcry of parents whose children have died and have been injured by vaccines and act like these people are liars and their child is dead because they refuse to vaccinate them.

Let me know the benefits of this stuff...

In view of its widespread use, toxicity and volatility, exposure to formaldehyde is a significant consideration for human health.[7] In 2011, the US National Toxicology Program described formaldehyde as "known to be a human carcinogen". Formaldehyde is highly toxic to all animals, regardless of method of intake.
Formaldehyde can be toxic, allergenic, and carcinogenic.[7] Because formaldehyde resins are used in many construction materials it is one of the more common indoor air pollutants.[36] At concentrations above 0.1 ppm in air formaldehyde can irritate the eyes and mucous membranes, resulting in watery eyes.[37] Formaldehyde inhaled at this concentration may cause headaches, a burning sensation in the throat, and difficulty breathing, and can trigger or aggravate asthma symptoms.


http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/formaldehyde


But hey since we are saying kids....why not?
 

Won Won

Superstar
Joined
Sep 11, 2012
Messages
14,851
Reputation
3,750
Daps
48,666
You can address me homie, stop acting like you scared. No one is ignoring those stats. What you are trying to say is every child would survive early child birth and disease to vaccines from some made-up science stats from the CDC. Impossible. Children die at birth isn't some unexplained phenomenon. It happens. You do ignore the outcry of parents whose children have died and have been injured by vaccines and act like these people are liars and their child is dead because they refuse to vaccinate them.

Let me know the benefits of this stuff...

In view of its widespread use, toxicity and volatility, exposure to formaldehyde is a significant consideration for human health.[7] In 2011, the US National Toxicology Program described formaldehyde as "known to be a human carcinogen". Formaldehyde is highly toxic to all animals, regardless of method of intake.
Formaldehyde can be toxic, allergenic, and carcinogenic.[7] Because formaldehyde resins are used in many construction materials it is one of the more common indoor air pollutants.[36] At concentrations above 0.1 ppm in air formaldehyde can irritate the eyes and mucous membranes, resulting in watery eyes.[37] Formaldehyde inhaled at this concentration may cause headaches, a burning sensation in the throat, and difficulty breathing, and can trigger or aggravate asthma symptoms.


http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/formaldehyde


But hey since we are saying kids....why not?


Formaldehyde is also naturally produced in our bodies, and is found in various fruits and vegetables. Do you not eat apples?
 

Won Won

Superstar
Joined
Sep 11, 2012
Messages
14,851
Reputation
3,750
Daps
48,666
HepB - Recombivax - 3 doses (birth, 1-2 mos. and 6-18 mos.) - 7.5μg/dose
  • DTaP - Infanrix - 5 doses (2 mos., 4 mos., 6 mos., 15-18 mos. and 4-6 yrs.) - 100μg/dose
  • Hib - ActHIB - 3 doses (2 mos., 4 mos. and 12-15 mos.) - 0.5μg/dose
  • IPV - IPOL - 4 doses (2 mos., 4 mos., 6-18 mos. and 4-6 yrs.) - 100μg/dose
  • Influenza - Fluzone - 7 doses (6 mos., 12 mos. and yearly 2-6 yrs.) - 100μg/dose
  • HepA - Havrix - 2 doses (12 mos. and 6-18 mos. after first dose) - 100μg/dose
That's all of the vaccines on the recommended schedule for 0-6 years that contain formaldehyde. If a child got all of those doses all at once (which they never would), they would get a total of 1,824μg, or 1.824mg, of formaldehyde. A3.2kg (~7lb) newborn with an average blood volume of 83.3mL/kg would naturally have, at any given time, about 575-862μg of formaldehyde circulating in their blood. By the time they are 6 years old (~46lb or 21kg), they'll naturally have 3,562-5,342μg of formaldehyde in their blood.
Bear in mind that the formaldehyde from each shot will not build up in their bodies from shot to shot, as it is very rapidly (within hours) metabolized and eliminated as formate in the urine or breathed out as CO2.
 

tmonster

Superstar
Joined
Nov 26, 2013
Messages
17,900
Reputation
3,205
Daps
31,792
HepB - Recombivax - 3 doses (birth, 1-2 mos. and 6-18 mos.) - 7.5μg/dose
  • DTaP - Infanrix - 5 doses (2 mos., 4 mos., 6 mos., 15-18 mos. and 4-6 yrs.) - 100μg/dose
  • Hib - ActHIB - 3 doses (2 mos., 4 mos. and 12-15 mos.) - 0.5μg/dose
  • IPV - IPOL - 4 doses (2 mos., 4 mos., 6-18 mos. and 4-6 yrs.) - 100μg/dose
  • Influenza - Fluzone - 7 doses (6 mos., 12 mos. and yearly 2-6 yrs.) - 100μg/dose
  • HepA - Havrix - 2 doses (12 mos. and 6-18 mos. after first dose) - 100μg/dose
That's all of the vaccines on the recommended schedule for 0-6 years that contain formaldehyde. If a child got all of those doses all at once (which they never would), they would get a total of 1,824μg, or 1.824mg, of formaldehyde. A3.2kg (~7lb) newborn with an average blood volume of 83.3mL/kg would naturally have, at any given time, about 575-862μg of formaldehyde circulating in their blood. By the time they are 6 years old (~46lb or 21kg), they'll naturally have 3,562-5,342μg of formaldehyde in their blood.
Bear in mind that the formaldehyde from each shot will not build up in their bodies from shot to shot, as it is very rapidly (within hours) metabolized and eliminated as formate in the urine or breathed out as CO2.

Shut up with your facts
1oIYWco.png
 
Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Messages
39,797
Reputation
-235
Daps
65,127
Reppin
NULL

There is no natural formaldehyde in fruits in veggies. That comes from pesticides and other neuro-toxins placed on food in the last 50 plus years. That isn't natural. Plus the only reason formaldehyde is in our systems is because it's been placed by the air pollutes, gmo food and tainted water. Cause and effect.
 

MMS

Intensity Integrity Intelligence
Staff member
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
27,342
Reputation
4,115
Daps
32,627
Reppin
Auburn, AL
There is no natural formaldehyde in fruits in veggies. That comes from pesticides and other neuro-toxins placed on food in the last 50 plus years. That isn't natural. Plus the only reason formaldehyde is in our systems is because it's been placed by the air pollutes, gmo food and tainted water. Cause and effect.
formaldehyde is also a byproduct in alcohol metabolism that is 90% of the reason it dehydrates you

its a very simple chemical and is in now way related to some of the more sophisticated pesticides designed out there
 

Won Won

Superstar
Joined
Sep 11, 2012
Messages
14,851
Reputation
3,750
Daps
48,666
There is no natural formaldehyde in fruits in veggies. That comes from pesticides and other neuro-toxins placed on food in the last 50 plus years. That isn't natural. Plus the only reason formaldehyde is in our systems is because it's been placed by the air pollutes, gmo food and tainted water. Cause and effect.

The point is that you, and everyone else on this forum, currently have higher levels of formaldehyde than what you would find in all vaccines combined.

Well maybe not those that grow their own produce, don't use water (even bottled), and never leave their bubble

IMG_2106_full.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Messages
39,797
Reputation
-235
Daps
65,127
Reppin
NULL
The point is that you, and everyone else on this forum, currently have higher levels of formaldehyde than what you would find in all vaccines combined.

Well maybe not those that grow their own produce, don't use water (even bottled), and never leave their bubble

IMG_2106_full.jpeg

Is that a picture of you? There is no evidence that the body, fruits or veggies naturally produces formaldehyde. What is thrown in it's place of evidence is a statement that it's naturally produced but without no remnants of origin in our systems. When we all know exactly what chemicals, acids and bacteria come from each organ, tissue, blood type, vessels, etc.

In other words since the body has ecoli and acid produced naturally in our systems, we should reintroduce it back into the bloodstream?
 
Top