Read Justice Alito's initial draft abortion opinion which would overturn Roe v. Wade
He literally is saying BROWN V BOARD is wrong
People should read the Alito opinion. He thinks Brown v Board was wrongly decided
- Thread starter ☑︎#VoteDemocrat
- Start date
Read Justice Alito's initial draft abortion opinion which would overturn Roe v. Wade
He literally is saying BROWN V BOARD is wrong
But the dems.....
east
Screwed up... till tha casket drops!!
cf. doesn't mean what you think it does. he's saying the exact opposite of what you think he is, that brown/texas (banned anti flag burning laws) corrected a great wrong while not exceeding the court's authority, like his draft opinion would (in his opinion). that doesn't make the comparison any less offensive but you're still totally wrong. 
Wrong.cf. doesn't mean what you think it does. he's saying the exact opposite of what you think he is, that brown/texas (banned anti flag burning laws) corrected a great wrong while not exceeding the court's authority, like his draft opinion would (in his opinion). that doesn't make the comparison any less offensive but you're still totally wrong.
Greg Carr, JD, PhD cleared this up today on his podcast.
Alito is literally saying he felt the public had too much influence during Brown v Board and it was decided wrong.
Secure Da Bag
Veteran
Well made the video private, so maybe he didn't clear it up all that well.
I hope they put it back up. He breaks this down. Plus @east the other case mentioned in Texas v Johnson wouldn't make sense any other way. That was a case about flag burning. Do you think Alito agrees with that?Well made the video private, so maybe he didn't clear it up all that well.
Texas v. Johnson - Wikipedia
Joe Budden
Banned
Gonna grab and chair and wait for the social conservatives to arrive.
east
Screwed up... till tha casket drops!!
alito probably hates that ruling too (check his dissent in snyder v. phelps) but he's not opining on that or brown, he's js that the supreme court wasn't overreaching when they overturned something that was precedent in 48 and 50 statesPlus @east the other case mentioned in Texas v Johnson wouldn't make sense any other way. That was a case about flag burning. Do you think Alito agrees with that?
Texas v. Johnson - Wikipedia
it's also a pretty low effort attempt at either trolling leftists by invoking cases which expanded civil rights to support the removal of abortion rights (worked great lmao) or trying to seem more moderate than he rly is, personally i see it as an "i have black friends too"-adjacent argument but that doesn't make his logic wrong
Take It In Blood
Banned
what are your thoughts on Gene v Simms?
So what does “cf” mean?
EDIT: it means compare
I think the judge is saying that Brown vs Board. was the correct decision even though it was extremely unpopular among the American cac public at the time
EDIT: it means compare
I think the judge is saying that Brown vs Board. was the correct decision even though it was extremely unpopular among the American cac public at the time
Last edited:
Wargames
One Of The Last Real Ones To Do It
Spooky
I'll take the word of an award winning black law professor and history scholar over yours. Thanks.
He said it legal latin for "counter factual"
Plus, he's clearly contrasting Brown and Texas v Johnson with socially conservative positions.
Pick an argument.
Either he's saying Brown v Board was incorrectly influenced by public opinion or he's saying the SCOTUS wasn't overreaching when they overturned precedent. You can't do both then by saying he's trolling by overturning state law.
This is just social conservatism all the way down. Pick an argument because he's just picking and choosing when to invoke precedent.
he's bullshytting.
east
Screwed up... till tha casket drops!!
wtf? it's not legal terminology at all and it comes from CONFER which means compare
that youtuber confused it with the word CONTRAand how does a lawyer misread an alito opinion, he writes in the plainest language out of all the justices too
