People should read the Alito opinion. He thinks Brown v Board was wrongly decided

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
324,762
Reputation
-34,132
Daps
632,329
Reppin
The Deep State
wtf? it's not legal terminology at all and it comes from CONFER which means compare :dead: that youtuber confused it with the word CONTRA
I put it in quotes.

I'm paraphrasing.

He's CONTRASTING Brown v Board with his opinion in Dobbs (this case)

Look, if you wanna MAGA and a social conservative dikkhead, just own it. :manny:

Stop moving the goalpost for this Neo-confederate justice.
 

El Bombi

Banned
Joined
Aug 31, 2012
Messages
53,517
Reputation
2,447
Daps
152,937
Reppin
NULL
Well that mean the future SWAC & MEAC football>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> future Power 5 football :whoo:
 

cobra

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Apr 24, 2017
Messages
11,688
Reputation
-1,137
Daps
50,853
I put it in quotes.

I'm paraphrasing.

He's CONTRASTING Brown v Board with his opinion in Dobbs (this case)

Look, if you wanna MAGA and a social conservative dikkhead, just own it. :manny:

Stop moving the goalpost for this Neo-confederate justice.
Then why did he mention the Texas vs Johnson case (where people have the right to desecrate the American flag)

that is a case where the verdict was against the public’s general sentiments
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2016
Messages
20,797
Reputation
4,379
Daps
49,003
i guess they should if they care but most people can't even read basic news articles for understanding let alone reconcile and understand legal concepts and opinions:huhldup:
 
Last edited:

paperbag

Death to the demoness Allegra Geller
Joined
Aug 24, 2017
Messages
4,051
Reputation
1,411
Daps
18,186
Pick an argument.

Either he's saying Brown v Board was incorrectly influenced by public opinion or he's saying the SCOTUS wasn't overreaching when they overturned precedent. You can't do both then by saying he's trolling by overturning state law.

This is just social conservatism all the way down. Pick an argument because he's just picking and choosing when to invoke precedent.

he's bullshytting.
He's saying the court should make the correct decision even when it will be unpopular with the general public. Such as the cases that legalized flag burning as protected speech and the desegregation of Public schools. So he doesn't care about the negative public backlash on overturning roe vs wade.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
324,762
Reputation
-34,132
Daps
632,329
Reppin
The Deep State
He's saying the court should make the correct decision even when it will be unpopular with the general public. Such as the cases that legalized flag burning as protected speech and the desegregation of Public schools. So he doesn't care about the negative public backlash on overturning roe vs wade.
I understand that.

But are we going to be stupid here?

Why did he pick those two examples? Why not examples where conservatives were wrong about a majority opinion? :stopitslime:

Furthermore, do you trust Alito?

Moreover, are you going to let him think you're stupid?

He picked TWO CASES that he disagrees with.

Mind you, theres judges Trump put in position that were DECLINING to address if they thought Brown v Board was incorrectly decided!

This IS the conservative plan here.

You all have GOT to stop taking what white nationalists say at face value as fact. Stop being fukkin' gullible. This is insulting bruh. These ain't your fukking friends.



 

cobra

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Apr 24, 2017
Messages
11,688
Reputation
-1,137
Daps
50,853
because he thinks PUBLIC OPINION WRONGLY INFLUENCED THOSE DECISIONS
:gucci:

Most people agreed with the anti desecration laws…the court invalidated them

Most Americans agreed with segregation in 1954, the court invalidated segregation in schools

what’s so difficult to understand?
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
324,762
Reputation
-34,132
Daps
632,329
Reppin
The Deep State
:gucci:

Most people agreed with the anti desecration laws…the court invalidated them

Most Americans agreed with segregation in 1954, the court invalidated segregation in schools

what’s so difficult to understand?
How did public opinion wrongfully influence those decisions? Both decisions went AGAINST the prevailing public opinion.
Yall really are gullible if you're taking these conservatives at fukkin face value. Get your head out your ass. They'll say one thing then do another.

They love doing this "one off" thing then years later completely violating it as their conservative pull back to the 50s accelerates.

They're being too cute by half bruh. He's trollling. He's pretending to care about public opinion influencing those decisions (when the activist energy was bubbling up for Brown v Board and defense of public flag burning even if popular opinion was against it knowing damn well HE HIMSELF WOULD NOT SUPPORT EITHER OF THOSE DECISIONS). Thats why Alito invokved black abortion birth rates as if he's an ally of black politics and demographics and using that to invalidate abortion writ large.

You HAVE to understand when you're being trolled.
 

NoGutsNoGLory

Superstar
Joined
Dec 22, 2014
Messages
6,637
Reputation
535
Daps
27,554
If the resources are shared evenly bring it back i dont give a fukk :manny:. Dont want to go to school with cacs, be scared about random shootings
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
324,762
Reputation
-34,132
Daps
632,329
Reppin
The Deep State
If the resources are shared evenly bring it back i dont give a fukk :manny:. Dont want to go to school with cacs, be scared about random shootings
...what? :stopitslime:

Why do yall love saying this stupid shyt? We're NOT going backwards. Yall can't keep doing this dumbass thought experiment of coulda, shoulda, woulda. It doesn't work and its not worth even trying it AGAIN knowing damn well you haven't thought this out. This reactionary half assed commentary isn't even worth entertaining.

They aren't. We already ran this experiment.

Plus, if its property tax derived, then we're fukked.

Oh wait, the "tangibles crew" doesn't vote locally so theres no change this even gets challenged in states due to voter apathy.

:snoop:



@Red Shield @Michael's Black Son @Sukairain @YouMadd? @Basil of Baker Street @SupremexKing @Cat piss martini @AndroidHero @Pirius Black @panopticon @johnedwarduado @neotheflyingone @Ishlibidish23 @SJUGRAD13 @BlueHeffner
 

Wild self

The Black Man will prosper!
Supporter
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
83,228
Reputation
12,160
Daps
225,560
If the resources are shared evenly bring it back i dont give a fukk :manny:. Dont want to go to school with cacs, be scared about random shootings

but the thing is, resources not gonna be shared properly. Those poor black school districts gonna have teachers barely making above minimum wage and outdated reading material. Your kids will be reading at a 4th grade level when they graduate high school due to a lack of proper funding.
 

El Bombi

Banned
Joined
Aug 31, 2012
Messages
53,517
Reputation
2,447
Daps
152,937
Reppin
NULL
If the resources are shared evenly bring it back i dont give a fukk :manny:. Dont want to go to school with cacs, be scared about random shootings

But OP and his Indian Call Center want to attend school with their CAC lovers tho. :yeshrug:
 
Top