If the resources are shared evenly bring it back i dont give a fukk. Dont want to go to school with cacs, be scared about random shootings
Lol at anyone thinking the resources will be evenly shared.
People should read the Alito opinion. He thinks Brown v Board was wrongly decided
- Thread starter ☑︎#VoteDemocrat
- Start date
Lol at anyone thinking the resources will be evenly shared.
and whats worse is dudes like that will just toss that out there and go about their day thinking they solved the issue
we watching the game
2016 inaction continues to haunt us.
goes back to bush and company stealing the election in 2000.
this is the wrong timeline.
If the resources are shared evenly bring it back i dont give a fukk
Those that fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it 
We are entering some dark times
If the resources are shared evenly bring it back i dont give a fukk
Cactricks, can't make this shyt yo
Updated with time stamp:cf. doesn't mean what you think it does. he's saying the exact opposite of what you think he is, that brown/texas (banned anti flag burning laws) corrected a great wrong while not exceeding the court's authority, like his draft opinion would (in his opinion). that doesn't make the comparison any less offensive but you're still totally wrong.
Starting at 1:55:00:
Red Shield
Global Domination
...what?
Why do yall love saying this stupid shyt? We're NOT going backwards. Yall can't keep doing this dumbass thought experiment of coulda, shoulda, woulda. It doesn't work and its not worth even trying it AGAIN knowing damn well you haven't thought this out. This reactionary half assed commentary isn't even worth entertaining.
They aren't. We already ran this experiment.
Plus, if its property tax derived, then we're fukked.
Oh wait, the "tangibles crew" doesn't vote locally so theres no change this even gets challenged in states due to voter apathy.
the usa is fukked
FukkaPaidEmail
Retired Hoodrat whisperer
The case he disagrees with is Casey V. Planned Parenthood.
The two cases he used Brown and Johnson are cases that went against public opinion/ State Law but the court still made the decisions it made. I appreciate you making threads that don’t follow the normal TLR bullshyt but this is Liberal Fox News level misinformation . It’s bullshyt when they do it ..and it’s bullshyt when you do it here
If you read the opinion you would know this ..and I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt and said you did …but your OP is a straight up lie .
The two cases he used Brown and Johnson are cases that went against public opinion/ State Law but the court still made the decisions it made. I appreciate you making threads that don’t follow the normal TLR bullshyt but this is Liberal Fox News level misinformation . It’s bullshyt when they do it ..and it’s bullshyt when you do it here
If you read the opinion you would know this ..and I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt and said you did …but your OP is a straight up lie .