prophecypro
Hollywood North
I love Nas. That Office Hours song... I mean, sheeah, Nas' flow was one of the worst ows I've ever heard from a top lyricist.
I can't believe that shyt went over in the studio.
On office hours ? he went in on that
I love Nas. That Office Hours song... I mean, sheeah, Nas' flow was one of the worst ows I've ever heard from a top lyricist.
I can't believe that shyt went over in the studio.
Yep, 100%. These people are not hip hop heads like that, they're just Nas fans.
I saw that. They said that shyt with their chest too.That Extra P thread was eye opening, heads straight shytted on Breaking Atoms like it was nothing. I was reading some of the takes and was like
![]()
Then came to the same conclusion that you did.
I saw that. They said that shyt with their chest too.
These guys can only imagine Nas and Pete Rock/Alchemist collabs sounding like something from 20 years ago because they don't have any context to draw from if it wasn't on a Nas release. 0 clue about what Pete Rock and Alchemist have accomplished since the last time they featured on a Nas album.
The idea of Alchemist's sound evolving into a something completely different than it was 20 years ago is confusing to them. Like kindergartners when they find out their teachers have full lives when they're not in class and don't just live at the school.
They're supposed to have the capacity to conceptualize what current day Pete Rock and Alchemist could sound like when mixed with current day Nas. Artists are constantly evolving and 20 years have passed since any of them have really locked in together. People want to hear what their new styles sound like when put together. No one is asking to see a retread of their styles from 20 years ago.What are they supposed to think? What Pete Rock and Alchemist have done with other artists is completely irrelevant. What they've created with other artists gives no indication of what direction Nas will take them in and vice versa. We've seen this too many times. Back when Alc first started working with Nas, his music with Nas sounded nothing like "We Gon Make It" and that was joint Nas turned down. Classic song, but Nas didn't see it as a fit for him. We still got some crazy records out of the Alchemist sessions though.
Even with Hit Boy, those first collaborations with Nas were abominations (see the unreleased "Black Girl Lost Part 2"). "Royalty" was ok, but they didn't hit a stride until King's Disease.
They're supposed to have the capacity to conceptualize what current day Pete Rock and Alchemist could sound like when mixed with current day Nas. Artists are constantly evolving and 20 years have passed since any of them have really locked in together. People want to hear what their new styles sound like when put together. No one is asking to see a retread of their styles from 20 years ago.
It's a really simple concept, and I feel like you have to be completely disingenuous to even imply that work done with one artists doesn't give any indication of what their work would sound like with another artist. Alchemists beats for Nas during their past sessions were really not that different from other beats he was making at that time. He produced way more than We Gon Make It... Why would that be your only point of comparison?
Seriously, this is really, really simple stuff. Just use your brain and try to imagine their current sounds together, ignoring their past work. Can you look at a can of paint, and then imagine what that color could look like on your wall? Can you take two cans of paint and imagine what the colors could look like when mixed together? Then be able to disregard the color yiour wall is currently painted with, and imagine what it would look like with the new blended color? Children develop conceptual thinking really early on, it shouldn't be too hard for an adult to figure out. Lack of object permanence is obviously an issue here as well, though![]()
It's not a set up for disappointment. It's a simple thought exercise. There is always a probability that it could be a disappointment, but that's why people keep pointing to Alchemist. He has an incredible track record. We believe the probability that they create something classic together is much greater than if he continued working with Hitboy instead. You may not share that opinion, but that doesn't make it wrong. Regardless if I end up finding it disappointing or not, why would I give a shyt if it gets called wack by someone else. I don't need other peoples opinions to validate my own.Conceptualizing what somebody's sound will sound like when mixed with another artist is a set up for disappointment. That's a huge reason why people take issue with Nas's beat selection because they see a producer's name and the expectation is that it is going to sound like something said producer did for X,Y, and Z. When it sounds like a Nas song produced by said producer, then it gets called wack because it doesn't sound like it was imagined to sound.
Therefore a prdocuer's work for one artist isn't an indicator for what they might do for another unless theybare just giving making the same beat with minor changes.
I brought up "We Gon Make It" because that beat was presented to Nas, but he passed on it.
Sure I can imagine what two colors of paint will look like on my wall, but it actually turning out like I conceived it is another story.
Thread is proof that rap fans are never happy.
It's not a set up for disappointment. It's a simple thought exercise. There is always a probability that it could be a disappointment, but that's why people keep pointing to Alchemist. He has an incredible track record. We believe the probability that they create something classic together is much greater than if he continued working with Hitboy instead. You may not share that opinion, but that doesn't make it wrong. Regardless if I end up finding it disappointing or not, why would I give a shyt if it gets called wack by someone else. I don't need other peoples opinions to validate my own.
Whether it turns out like you conceived it or not is completely irrelevant. You said that there was nothing to indicate what current Nas and Alchemist may sound like together. There's tons of evidence indicating what it might sound like. They're both dropping multiple albums every year.
Alright, I don't see any logical reason to assume otherwise, and you're not even trying to give one, but more importantly, as I said:His track record has no bearing on whether he would make better music with Nas than Hit Boy. That is what we're saying is wrong: the assumption that Alchemist would make better music than Nas based on recent work with ither artists. If that were the case, Nas and Hit Boy wouldn't work at all considering Hit created sub par music with Nas for "Black Girl Lost 2" and "Royalty" was ok. His work with other artists sounded nothing like a Nas song.
You may not share that opinion, but that doesn't make it wrong.
To me Salaam Remi is better than Hit Boy and from a production standpoint Life is Good is better than any of these albums…
Hit Boy is a good producer and the beats are fine he’s not a problem but Nas has declined vocally, lyrically, and I don’t like his attempts to ride trap beats shyt just don’t sound right, also his subject matter/themes have become predictable.
I’m also not sure why Nas chose to drop all these albums with the same producer he oversaturated. The albums are cool but all this classic, 4.5 mics shyt is stan talk.