Judy Mikovitz, Andrew Wakefield, and Del Bigtree agree with you.
You ignored everything else I just said and took that snippet out of context. Do you mind responding to the entire post?
Judy Mikovitz, Andrew Wakefield, and Del Bigtree agree with you.
Swaggatron said:You ignored everything else I just said
Because everything after what I quoted was nonsense and not worth responding to.
If you are against getting vaccinated and against mandated vaccination, you ARE an anti-vaxxer by definition.
Swaggatron said:Respectfully that is incorrect an anti vaxxer would be against most if not all vaccines
Neither the common cold nor the flu have the same death rate so this criticism utterly fails. Next.....
Says the guy scared of a little needle.
"Only 2 BILLION people died from a completely preventable disease. Still not getting it!!!! "

False.....
a person who opposes vaccination or laws that mandate vaccination
Just in case you disagree for some reason.....
Peter Sokolowski, editor at large of Merriam-Webster.com, said that the entry for “anti-vaxxer” was first added to the online dictionary in February 2018 and hasn’t been revised or changed since. It has always defined it as “a person who opposes vaccination or laws that mandate vaccination.”
Covid ended the flu. Reduced reported flu infections by 90 percent.Seems like this means everyone doesnt need to take the shot though right. If everyone in the high risk zones took it and you left it optional for the rest of the population. And by now there is plenty of data to prove who is high risk, we would be straight with 2-7% of the population taking it. Trying to mandate the other 93% (6.8 billion) people take it seems a bit much no?
Flu killed 675,000 Americans in the first year on a 100m population (equivalent of 2.1m deaths today) and kills 40-60k a year and its still not mandated.
Can't be surprised some people are anti vax
They're stupid for being cautious about a 'vaccine' that was pushed out in a few months for a never before seen virus without any real clinical trials or long term data?
Dog I'm vaccinated, but some of y'alls arguments againt anti-vaxxers are fukking retarded and reek of fear aka acting like a scared bytch. Nobody is AGAINST vaccines bruh, people just want more data and more evidence this 'vaccine' isn't gonna fukk them up in the long term.
Dallas' 4 Eva said:Bruh there was an flu pandemic that killed over 100 million people in 3 years. Covid isn't even gonna get CLOSE to those numbers, NOT EVEN CLOSE.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...hing-1918-flu-pandemic-with-some-key-caveats/
COVID has killed about as many Americans as the 1918-19 flu
You were saying?
Now that's out of the way, trying for 'natural immunity' via NOT being vaccinated is a poor choice.
Dallas' 4 Eva said:Ok how about worldwide bruh. Stop cherry picking. Worldwide covid isn't even fukking CLOSE to that pandemic.
like most thing that are FDA approved don't get taken off the market. Notice how the media sweeping this under rag I really won't be surprised if a commerical come out in the next few years saying if you took the Pfizer vaccine in this year you may be entitled to compensation. How this been approved since 06 and Pfizer didn't know makes me wonder what's else they don't know probably why they want full liability protection and other nations assets.https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...hing-1918-flu-pandemic-with-some-key-caveats/
COVID has killed about as many Americans as the 1918-19 flu
You were saying?
Now that's out of the way, trying for 'natural immunity' via NOT being vaccinated is a poor choice......and we don't have those numbers anymore because a FLU VACCINE WAS DEVELOPED IN THE 40'S.
But this moment also requires context.
The first obvious point is that our nation’s population is much larger now — by more than three times: The U.S. population in 1918 was just over 100 million, compared with nearly 330 million today. So while the 1918 death toll accounted for about 1 in 150 Americans, we’re currently at 1 in 500.
