OnlyInCalifornia
Southern California/Vegas
Akademik is right, they don't give a fukk. They only did this to jump on all the internet buzz Keef got the last few days.
To be honest I'm not sure what point you are talking about
I just think its funny that people are saying pitchfork is stupid for taking him to a gun range, I'm just curious as to what place people think would be more appropriate for an interview

u cant be serious breh
how bout anywhere
These new age rap mags and blogs are trying to make a name for themselves, so they try to be shocking in the name of being cutting edge. I read a review where Waka Flocka got a 8.9 because he was good at making ignorant music.
I just they hope realize these rappers are not actors, and are really trying to make their way through life.
thanks pitchfork, single handledly saved hip hop. thank you to the justice system that got a criminal like chief keef off the streets as well. one less nikka 2 have 2 worry about snatchin my chain at night.

Keef knew the terms of his probation. Its like some older head asking a youngin to do some dirt with him, and the youngin is the only one who gets caught.

I can't find this video ANYWHERE! Does anyone have it?

so you think its fine to interview chief keef and to promote his music just not at a gun range?
if they had done the interview in a studio or in an office that would be cool?
You know the deal, as soon as it's a white person profiting off of the violence within Black communities and Black culture, it's an outrage, but when Blacks kill, maim and exploit each other for literally no reason, it's a "funny situation" (Close to something someone actually wrote in one of those Keef/JoJo threads).
But we keep perpetuating the hypocrisy, because Black male identity depends on maintaining it, and we don't want to explore the contradictions in that, now do we?
Like others have alluded to, you could easily say that, after a certain point, entire swaths of Hip-Hop music are grossly irresponsible projects that do more harm to the perceptions that Blacks have about themselves, others have about Blacks and the interrelationship between the two.
But what's the real difference between portraying the destitution of the poor Black experience as a means of critiquing it and glorifying that context which arrests and molds the experiences of those in it? If you paint it in broad strokes like Pitchfork and other hipster sites often do, or like you did in that postulation, or like I did in the paragraph above, then you risk invalidating and erasing a great amount of actual commentary as illegitimate in trying to bleed the poison out. When thinking about Chief Keef and the irresponsibility of promoting him in a larger context, this is always a prevalent dilemma.
Yes. As are they for promoting their own images to some extent. As are we for perpetuating it as "real" and legitimate when we sure as shyt know better.