Play a break up prank on your demonic boyfriend and catch 8 haymakers, brehettes

[Professor Emeritus]

14

Girls born in 05 already goddamn Domestic Violence victims

Fukk all of that. Just... fukk.

I got cousins who are her age, i cant imagine them dealing with domesitc abuse already??

Sometimes i take a step and think how different my life would have been if i had to deal with shyt on this level as a child.... instead of playing basketball and super mario world

14 and its already started


Imagine being ruled by your emotions brehs, this what happens when theres no fathers at home. Ls for everyone

OH My Gah, I don't even know what to say she's hella young. I just hope she avoids having offspring.

Edit: I just noticed the kid has a tattoo on her chest, man these little shyts are something else when I was 14 ain't no girl had a tatt.

Damaged already and she only 14 or so.

I was thinking about y'all saying this and how it was different when we were kids.

Straight up most young guys were scared of/intimidated by girls. Teenagers caught up in their emotions and not knowing what to do. Even the ones that were acting confident were usually fronting. Girls were new, and hard to understand, and you wanted to move lightly and not ruin your shot because you didn't really believe the next one would come so easy.

Nowadays the average 16yo breh has had access to all the most depraved porn he could handle for at least 5-6 years. Girls ain't no mystery, they just exist to do whatever the fukk you want them to do. Those young brehs have spent 100x more time looking at porn than they have interacting with real girls sexually, so porn is the NORM to them. The girls who want a guy have to compete with that, and start giving in to their depraved wishes, and get fukked up themselves. Then when a girl doesn't go along, she's a problem, because in the porn the girls ALWAYS go along. So they get mad, and since she's just an object to them it's no wonder the beating comes quick.

I dunno, it's just a theory but I think it fits the societal trends.

 

[LurkMoar]

This. Legit should ban worldstar videos from the site.

Co-sign

 

[Marco Zen]

It is interesting how most of the posts in this thread blame the girl

 

[semicko82]

It is interesting how most of the posts in this thread blame the girl

If she doesn’t leave him

 

[David_TheMan]

In other threads he's admitted to reading far-right and alt-right lit, buys neo-confederate books, capes for their views. He literally started a thread attacking Obama because Obamacare is "killing" White people. He's embedded their views and approaches in his mind, and even if he tries to twist their thinking into a "pro-black" cause, it doesn't work cause their thinking was corrupted to begin with.

Um.. I read right wing and left wing books. I obtain knowledge from WS about WS to see how they think and I don't deny this.

I literally made a thread about Obamacare because it was killing BLACK people. Black deaths and insurance coverage decreased under obamacare and that is what I posted in thread. That you continue to lie about me is telling though.

I do find it funny that you seemed absoultely and completely obssessed with me.

Last time we had a discusion in the The Colisieum, you were calling Jesse Owens a liar for saying he was treated better in Nazi Germany by Hitler than he was in his own country. I notice you are one of those liberals that is very defensive about the "honor" of the US and the racism practiced here, to the point you attack people who bring it up for not being respectful enough to the US or US designated white "heroes"

 

[Professor Emeritus]

Why does this @David_TheMan weirdo even reply to me when he knows I'll bring receipts?

Um.. I read right wing and left wing books. I obtain knowledge from WS about WS to see how they think and I don't deny this.

Bullshyt, in that thread you used a Neo-Confederate author as a source to argue FOR your viewpoint. You did nothing but AGREE with the fukking WS in that entire thread.

I have a book The Real Lincoln by Tom DiLorenzo that goes more into the actual goings on at the time regarding the hate that Lincoln had even post death. Such as US military sentencing members who spoke out about how much they hated him to death and etc.

Tom DiLorenzo is associated with those very "NeoConfederates" that you claim you're not associated with!

I don't care who Tom is associated with.

you are buying the arguments of Neoconfederates hook, line, and sinker. Whether or not you're a confederate yourself is irrelevant, because you're promoting claims and research made PURELY by neoconfederates who have been completely discredited by the research community.

Then when it came up in another thread, you lied and claimed to have apologized when you found out he was a NeoConfederate, then changed up your story and admitted that you knew he was a NeoConfederate all along.

I stood by what I said and sourced everything I claimed and never once stepped down from my claim. The only thign I did admit was that I didn't know DeLorenzo was a neoconfederate, and I apoogized for that

No, you NEVER admitted or apologized for that, here is the page where we discuss DeLorenzo, show me one place where you admit and apologize.

Your only reply when I exposed you was "I don't care who Tom is associated with", you never once apologized for being wrong about DeLorenzo.

You are right, I got into a convo about Dilorenzo at another site, when I didn't know.
Yeah looking back nothing to apologize for in our conversation on this site.

You admit that you already knew that Dilorenzo was a NeoConfederate before you decided to quote him and ride with him here.



You also like crazy for a White cop who was flying the Confederate flag, saying that it wasn't racist and she shouldn't lose her job and she was a great cop.

Department is going to get sued and this woman is about to get paid.
Can't penalize people for political speech.

Police typically have certain morality clauses, which flying a flag like the confederate flag would be hard to be applied to.

on top of that raising a confederate flag can't directly be tied to being a white supermacy or racist group.

There is a total breach of rights here, most likely gonna get them on a violation of 1st amendment, since this is the state and not a private business. the worker has a right to express political opinion without being punished by the state with regard to being removed from their profession.

Article I read said her record is full of commendations.

 

[David_TheMan]

Why does this @David_TheMan weirdo even reply to me when he knows I'll bring receipts?



Bullshyt, in that thread you used a Neo-Confederate author as a source to argue FOR your viewpoint. You did nothing but AGREE with the fukking WS in that entire thread.

My point was that the Confederates were racist and the USA and the union was equally racist and that Abraham Lincoln was a white supremacist.
So what is the problem?
You are so angry to find out that Lincoln wasn't beloved and was a white supremacist that you think me citing the people who would know is a negative? LOL
LIke I said you are a lost liberal c00n soul.

Then when it came up in another thread, you lied and claimed to have apologized when you found out he was a NeoConfederate, then changed up your story and admitted that you knew he was a NeoConfederate all along.

You admit that you already knew that Dilorenzo was a NeoConfederate before you decided to quote him and ride with him here.

Like I said about Dilorenzo, I don't care or support what he is.
I posted facts he documented. You like usual engage in a logical fallacy of trying to attack the messenger instead of address the fact.
The supposed fact being that Lincoln was disliked while alive.
That is what this is all about, you were mad that I didn't worship a white supremacist that Abraham Lincoln was. LOL

You also like crazy for a White cop who was flying the Confederate flag, saying that it wasn't racist and she shouldn't lose her job and she was a great cop.

All those posts and not once did I say what you wrote, and you sourced it for me. Thanks.
I simply said it would be illegal to fire a cop for flying a confederate flag. Because it would most likely be protected speech.
I didn't say the person wasn't a racist or that I support the person being a cop, simply that it would be illegal to fire them for having a confederate flag flying.
I never said the cop was a great cop either, I simply stated the fact that the article said the cop had a record full of commendations.

Its strange how stating facts makes you angry.

 

[DapMeUp!]

Both of their parents lost.

 

[The_Truth]

WTF did I just watch?

 

[Professor Emeritus]

I literally made a thread about Obamacare because it was killing BLACK people. Black deaths and insurance coverage decreased under obamacare and that is what I posted in thread. That you continue to lie about me is telling though.

More. Bullshyt. Lies.

You didn't mention Black people in that thread ONCE. Not once. I keep exposing you as a liar over and over.

Here's your thread - where do you EVER mention Black people? Obamacare has led to a increase in US death rate


You couldn't claim that Black deaths were increasing or that insurance was decreasing because both of those claims are LIES.

NPR Choice page


On top of that, your entire post was a Hans Bader article, who is ANOTHER fukking racist that you read and cape for:

How about we read some Hans Bader quotes?

In a May 17 speech commemorating Brown v. Board of Education, Attorney General Holder claimed that “in too many of our school districts,” “segregation has reoccurred.” That includes, he erroneously said, “zero-tolerance school discipline practices that, while well-intentioned and aimed at promoting school safety, affect black males at a rate three times higher than their white peers.”

But higher black suspension rates reflect higher rates of misbehavior among blacks, not zero-tolerance policies.

A 2014 study in the Journal of Criminal Justice by criminologists like John Paul Wright found that racial disparities in student discipline result from more frequent misbehavior by blacks, not racism. The study, entitled “Prior Problem Behavior Accounts for the Racial Gap in School Suspensions,” concluded that higher black suspension rates are “completely accounted for” by students’ own behavior. Since racial disparities are caused by student conduct, getting rid of zero-tolerance will not end them.

Blacks, who are only 13 percent of the population, commit nearly half of all homicides. The Education Department claimed there is no evidence of “more frequent” misbehavior by minority students. But the homicide rate is 10 times higher among black teens than white teens.

curbing suspensions in the name of racial balance can harm African-Americans, who are often victims of black-on-black violence.

the courts have recognized that schools are not guilty of discrimination merely because black students get suspended from school at a higher rate than whites, since the higher rate may just reflect higher rates of misbehavior.

Two of the world’s three most violent terrorist groups — Boko Haram and al-Shabab — are African. The bloodiest terrorist group in the world in several recent years was Boko Haram, a violent Nigerian sect. That African terrorist group has killed countless thousands of people, including burning students alive and abducting many girls, and laid waste to entire regions in Nigeria, Africa’s most populous country.

Lemon’s misleading remarks were crude race-baiting and fearmongering. They were designed not to inform viewers but rather to strike fear in them. By leaving CNN’s viewers with images of scary white men with guns, Lemon may have motivated some of them to go out and vote for the Democrats.

The Post has published many other hate-filled screeds over the years, designed to foment fear and rage among its predominantly liberal readers. One example is a racist op-ed by Charlotte and Harriet Childress. They claimed that “nearly all of the mass shootings in this country in recent years … have been committed by white men and boys.” The Post published this claim, even though most of the shootings committed in The Post’s own region were committed by non-whites, such as Beltway sniper John Muhammad

Report buried Trump-related ‘hate crimes’ against white kids

“They left that result out because it would not fit their ideological narrative,” former Education Department civil rights attorney Hans Bader said. “It was deemed an inconvenient truth.”

Leading Democrats are now endorsing reparations for black Americans. That could cost taxpayers trillions of dollars and harm the economy.

Most forms of reparations would violate the Constitution as currently interpreted by the Supreme Court. It interprets the Constitution as usually forbidding racial handouts

The federal government is thus not allowed to provide special treatment to blacks in one state just because another state once practiced slavery or segregation. Even when federal officials in one state were in some sense complicit in discrimination against black people, that does not mean that the government can give blacks special treatment in an entirely different state.

The fact that blacks are “underrepresented” in various occupations is not proof of discrimination because racial imbalance is not the same thing as discrimination.

So if a liberal politician gets elected president in 2020 and appoints more liberal justices to the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court might not block race-based reparations, no matter how costly they end up being for taxpayers. Instead, it might get rid of the requirement that special treatment based on race has to be justified under a “strict scrutiny” test. As a result, even very costly and ill-advised forms of racial favoritism could become constitutional.

That's who brought onto this site and decided to roll with to attack Obama.

 

[Maxine Shaw]

14 and its already started


Imagine being ruled by your emotions brehs, this what happens when theres no fathers at home. Ls for everyone

Or it's possible that he's mimicking the behavior he grew up seeing.

 

[David_TheMan]

More. Bullshyt. Lies.

You didn't mention Black people in that thread ONCE. Not once. I keep exposing you as a liar over and over.

Here's your thread - where do you EVER mention Black people? Obamacare has led to a increase in US death rate


You couldn't claim that Black deaths were increasing or that insurance was decreasing because both of those claims are LIES.

NPR Choice page


On top of that, your entire post was a Hans Bader article, who is ANOTHER fukking racist that you read and cape for:

How about we read some Hans Bader quotes?

That's who brought onto this site and decided to roll with to attack Obama.

Nice goalpost moving.
It went from a thread where you said I was making posts specifically expressing concern for white people. Yet in the thread I never even type the word white.
To now acting like I supported the man who wrote the article.
Typical of you to lie and see what sticks.
If he presents data, which is what he did with his research in the article I posted, that is enough for me.

 

[LurkMoar]

Or it's possible that he's mimicking the behavior he grew up seeing.

Endless cycle

 

[Professor Emeritus]

Last time we had a discusion in the The Colisieum, you were calling Jesse Owens a liar for saying he was treated better in Nazi Germany by Hitler than he was in his own country. I notice you are one of those liberals that is very defensive about the "honor" of the US and the racism practiced here, to the point you attack people who bring it up for not being respectful enough to the US or US designated white "heroes"

Another. Bullshyt. Lie.

This is why you never quote me when you make your claims. Because there's nothing to quote. You know you lying.

I NEVER called Jesse Owens a liar. Not ONCE. You are full of crap.

YOU called the daughter of Jesse Owens a liar. You were defending Hitler and your only source was a random German named Siegfried Mischner. You chose to believe some white fukking German talking 50 years after the fact over Jesse Owens' own daughter.


That Hitler-defending thread was also the thread where I pulled in receipts of you defending all sorts of other racists:

Factually the majority of the south werent slaveholders.

Yes, There Were Black Confederates. Here’s Why

African American Involvement in the Confederate Army | Ford's Theatre

68% of households didn't own slaves. 32% is an extremely small percentage.

32% is really just the households. If you look at it by population it was less than 10% of the total population in the south that even owned slaves. Either way the whole mythbusting aspect is ruined when they can't refute the fact that the majority of the south did not own slaves, and try to talk about the attitude of white supremacy of the south in its place.

Rand and Ron Paul are some of the better ones who are actually politicians, especially Ron.

Damn Gop needs to beg Ron Paul to come in the game and save them.
He is their only hope

Would be great if Ron Paul was still in Congress.

Listen to Ron Paul vs the GOP establishment in the primaries and witness a man body a whole audience, moderator, and everyone on stage.

Fact is there is only been one guy in recent time who wasn't bought and paid for by those in power and that was Ron Paul

Yep, but I think there is enough idiocy or your average white and black voters to show why all rejected Ron Paul

you guys are talking about fukking Trump like he is the end of the world, when things were worse under Obama, and no one held him accountable.

The funny part about you trump scared people is that you don't even realize that objectively things were worse under Obama as far as blacks being murdered by cops than under Trump.

how the fukk trump made folks bold again, when black folks been getting openly harassed and murdered under Obama from when he got in?

These anti-Trump outbursts is nothing but 'virtue" signaling by progressives and its ridiculous.

Trump has the right and his people have the right to be as angry and racist as they want.
What no one has the right to do to Trump and his followers is violate their legal rights, period.

 

[Professor Emeritus]

Um.. I read right wing and left wing books. I obtain knowledge from WS about WS to see how they think and I don't deny this

No, you read WS in order to AGREE with what they think, and I have caught you doing it numerous times.

* You admitted owning a book by NeoConfederate Tom DiLorenzo and quoted the book APPROVINGLY, claiming that he was right about Lincoln and the Civil War.

* You posted an entire article by racist Hans Bader APPROVINGLY, claiming he was right about Obama and Obamacare.

* You repeatedly cape for racist Ron Paul.

* You caped for a Confederate flag-waving police officer and tried to claim the Confederate Flag wasn't tied to a racist group.

* You repeatedly cape for the South during the slave era and try to claim that the vast majority of slaveowners weren't slaves.

* You derailed a thread about Jackie Robinson in order to cape for Hitler.

* You repeatedly derail threads about Trump to claim that he has the right to be racist, that he hasn't made the country any more racist, and that Obama was just as bad.


You come out on the side of White Supremacists over and over. THAT is what reading them all the time has done to you.

Nice goalpost moving.
It went from a thread where you said I was making posts specifically expressing concern for white people. Yet in the thread I never even type the word white.

Bullshyt. You claimed "I literally made a thread about Obamacare because it was killing BLACK people. Black deaths and insurance coverage decreased under obamacare and that is what I posted in thread."

But you didn't mention Black people once in that thread. Not ONCE. You couldn't, because the Black life expectancy went UP under Obama. They only life expectancy that went down was White people. So when you posted that entire article by a known racist attacking Obama, the only people it could have been in support of were White people. Because Black life expectancy DIDN'T GO DOWN.

You also lied in claiming that I had called Jesse Owens a liar. You can't quote me saying that. not once. Just like the rest of your repeated lies.