filial_piety
Banned
That would be the oldest ticket in history.Biden/Bernie
What do they have? Like 200 years between the two of them?
That would be the oldest ticket in history.Biden/Bernie
You sure?Sherrod Brown would win the general election...but I don't think he can win the nom. Harris would be a perfect VP but I think she could potentially win as the nom. Dems need someone who can excite the base. The failure of the Clinton ticket, while stunning at the time, makes more sense in hindsight when you look at the numbers and see just how disinterested many parts of the base were. Despite Clinton doing everything to appeal to them. I think Harris or Booker as the nom or VP changes that in 2020.
I don't like Booker but he could win. Honestly those three names are the best "new" shots. Biden would certainly win IMO, but who knows if he runs.
I don't think Sanders will matter in 2020. Whether people want to admit it or not, Sanders' primary success was largely a product of him being the only alternative to Clinton. He became the anti-Hillary vote. Whereas for instance in 2008 the anti-Hillary vote had multiple choices but largely went to Obama and Edwards. Sanders is NOT going to succeed against a large field of candidates who actually have support among broad parts of the base. Booker and Harris will do great with college kids, Brown/Biden will do well with older white voters, Gillibrand might do well with (white) women, etc.
You sure?![]()
Trump will be a 2 term president, the dems have nothing
Bernie Sanders is the most popular politician in America. So...I don't think Sanders will matter in 2020. Whether people want to admit it or not, Sanders' primary success was largely a product of him being the only alternative to Clinton. He became the anti-Hillary vote. Whereas for instance in 2008 the anti-Hillary vote had multiple choices but largely went to Obama and Edwards. Sanders is NOT going to succeed against a large field of candidates who actually have support among broad parts of the base. Booker and Harris will do great with college kids, Brown/Biden will do well with older white voters, Gillibrand might do well with (white) women, etc.
After Trump, I won't make Predictions but whatever.uh not really, hence why I said "might"
I don't think she's noteworthy or impressive at all. But given how things work in relation to liberal and identity politics, SOMEONE is going to break out and do well with (white) female voters. The women's march activists will endorse someone. Granted it could be a man, or it could be Harris. But I'd expect it to be a white woman lol.
No doubt. Just found this TYT video on Biden and they have a photo where he is kissing a grown woman on the lips like its his wife
@ :48 seconds![]()
Sherrod Brown would win the general election...but I don't think he can win the nom. Harris would be a perfect VP but I think she could potentially win as the nom. Dems need someone who can excite the base. The failure of the Clinton ticket, while stunning at the time, makes more sense in hindsight when you look at the numbers and see just how disinterested many parts of the base were. Despite Clinton doing everything to appeal to them. I think Harris or Booker as the nom or VP changes that in 2020.
I don't like Booker but he could win. Honestly those three names are the best "new" shots. Biden would certainly win IMO, but who knows if he runs.
I don't think Sanders will matter in 2020. Whether people want to admit it or not, Sanders' primary success was largely a product of him being the only alternative to Clinton. He became the anti-Hillary vote. Whereas for instance in 2008 the anti-Hillary vote had multiple choices but largely went to Obama and Edwards. Sanders is NOT going to succeed against a large field of candidates who actually have support among broad parts of the base. Booker and Harris will do great with college kids, Brown/Biden will do well with older white voters, Gillibrand might do well with (white) women, etc.