I'm sure there are some, but i'm sure if you talked to 100 pornstars maybe 95 will tell you some fukked up shyt.
Yeah reminds me of this interview with former porn actress Shelley Luben. Her story is horrific
Rip to her, she died last year
I'm sure there are some, but i'm sure if you talked to 100 pornstars maybe 95 will tell you some fukked up shyt.
Agreed but my concern is how easy was it to get deviant shyt back in the day? Sure Spice, Playboy, Players etc. but the other shyt was WAY underground and the average person didn't know about it much less have access to it. 15 seconds of clicking and you can watch whatever you want. In the 90s you had to order VHS tapes with cash from shady classified magazine advertisements to go beyond vanilla porn. Even then there wasn't a global community for that smut to plug into unless you lived in a huge city.
what exactly qualifies as "deviant shyt" to you? cause i'm pretty sure the majority of pornhubs categories would mirror the sections of any adult video store in the 80's.
how lucrative can it be now when they literally compete with free user generated content?
"Basically the topic of this thread: pedo shyt. Add in rape, bestiality, ghetto gaggers shyt, etc. These weren't normal adult video store content back in the day.

there are legal and policy bans on those already.![]()
what does that success looks like?
why do you think it should be banned?
as a matter of law it's already settled, covered by the first amendment. assuming you're in the united states.
I think you may be vastly underestimating how big the porn industry is.
The fact that onlyfans exists and requires a subscription and is still making women thousands while there are virtually endless amounts of free porn out there should tell you something.
No one has ever lamenting new pornographic content by saying "No more new videos for now, we have enough porn already"
Porn addicts are constantly searching for new girls.
I thought you were talking about it in the context of sex trafficking victims. i know it's lucrative for performers able to build an audience but i don't see how sex traffickers could make a lot of money on platforms that has a "personal" quality to it.
Yea cats were just searching for big booty bytches and ran into some illegal porn huh.........I never ran into this stuff![]()
This varies from person to person, but for me success is probably...
No porn studios
No porn on the internet
No distributing porn
Off the top of the head...
Its not the primary source of income. Its a sidr hustle for alot of them.
You're paying for a human being to fukk. Its not a leap to think that the sellers or buyers would advertise their "property" with private pornographic material.
This happens often in pedo rings
Are you stupid?
Having to manually check each video is not scalable and defeats the purpose of having user generated content. In other words, it would kill the site over night. They can automate the monitoring by comparing the uploaded video to illegal videos they've seen in the past, and they can rely on their users to report illegal videos but neither of these methods is perfect and things will sometimes slip through the cracks.Let's be reality, pornhub makes more than enough money to monitor what get uploaded to their site, by who and from where.
With clips4sale and paysites, they make far more money per uploaded video than they do with tube sites which means that monitoring videos manually is financially viable.The situations are not comparable.They go hard in eliminating stuff from clips4sale, certain paysites etc. I am talking about in a matter of minutes at times, yet they all of a sudden can't take down suspected slavery, child porn etc?