The difference is, lying about being a lawyer doesn't violate or disrespects a person's sexual preference.
I'd argue it does, because the person might prefer risking pregnancy with a person of means instead of a janitor who's lying about being a lawyer.
Its both funny and sad that the crazies on twitter etc would probably call you trans-phobic for such a view. I suppose its consistent with the "you can’t consent if you don’t have a full deck of cards/all the information" informed consent point that she states in the comment section.
My thing is though how often is it that you know everything you need to about a person before you have sex especially in situations like hook ups where you just met the person? You may want to enthusiastically have sex with them but not know everything about them that you need to.I dont know i still wouldn't go as far as calling some of the situations she described as rape maybe abusive behavior at most but i appreciate the discussion. Have a nice night.
You can't possibly know everything, but what's possible is removing the idea of games from the equation. We've got men out here scared to buy a woman dinner because she might only be there for the food, this type of insecurity is born out knowing that there's a potential game being played. If two people came together, put all of their cards on the table and let the chips fall where they may, they'd know much sooner whether or not they're compatible instead of what we have now which is people learning things about their "partners" years later that they should have known in the dating stage.
No one wants to negatively impact their chances of "scoring", so they'll run the best possible game to win only to turn around and pretend that same person is now somehow their "partner". Running game isn't a game where both players are on the same team, running game is one player strategizing against the other, it's toxic and backwards in my honest opinion.