It was a three part plan.
1) Part one was to give HBCU's a extra 2.5 billion dollars a year for 10 years. Better ones would've gotten more.
2) Part two was to limit people who attend HBCU's debt burdens to a max of 10 percent of their incomes.
3) Part 3 was to make high GPA students who make under 125000 attend HBCU's for free.
Don't honestly think it would've ever happened, considering the money would've involved Congressional oversight. That was Hillary shooting for the stars in an effort to get black votes.
Beyond that, let's be real, 125k isn't a lot of money for a two income household with college aged kids, especially in metro areas. I'd guess the vast majority of people that are paying for their kid's tuition at Morehouse/Spelman/Howard/Hampton make more than that.
Bigger problem is the long term viability problems these schools are facing. Whether the can got kicked 5-10 years down the road, it's still something that needs to be addressed. For Morehouse in particular, I think that there needs to be less focus on fostering a family environment, and more on mirroring the data driven, business approaches to efficiency present at PWIs.
I honestly think Morehouse (& other schools in the AUC) dropped the ball by not investing in their local community (West End) in order to make it safer, more attractive, and perhaps even become another stream of revenue for them. That, along with no real effort to modernize facilities leads me to believe that for too long Morehouse has been content living off of its reputation.
It's starting to reach a critical point in history for Morehouse...what do you care more about? Long term solvency or reputation? Everyone to date they've trotted out as president has been more interested in the latter...