I’m of the thought that running progressives in red/purple seats isn’t very conducive to winning for Democrats.
I just don’t think they have a chance. Too much stigma, too far left. Much easier for progressives to run and win against other Democrats especially older ones.
In a state like Tennessee, does it really matter though? I mean, you had a former Dem Gov run for US Senate and he's no progressive and he took an L to Marsha Blackburn.
Its true progressives don't have the infrastructure to even play in Senate general election races in blue states... much less in redder or purple states to make an informed declaration that they can
never win.
However, considering that redder states have weaker Dem party structures, less Dem machine politics, I think there's an opening for progressives in settings like that. Dem electeds in the KY House and some figures who were elected statewide in Kentucky saw the energy Booker brought and that is important for laying foundations.
Mackler was backed by the DSCC and other traditional Dem electeds/orgs and I don't know who was running that campaign but they probably were stealing money.
Robin Kimbrough Hayes is another black progressive woman who was running and she got 27% of the vote.
Bradshaw winning while only raising $8,400 (I had to check the FEC records now to even make sure) is absolutely stunning. How the hell does this happen
