PS3 NCAA 13 Online Dynasty League Thread!!!

Rekkapryde

GT, LWO, 49ERS, BRAVES, HAWKS, N4O...yeah UMAD!
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
160,159
Reputation
32,057
Daps
543,683
Reppin
TYRONE GA!
Have you even considered what I said about your moving players around rule change:comeon:



And what would that be....next season there will be ZERO moving of players....only the shifts the game has built in. THIS season you are allowed to move players into position to play a man or zone more effectively, but not for blitzes.
 

L@CaT

For Hire Gunslinger!
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
16,182
Reputation
-615
Daps
28,460

And what would that be....next season there will be ZERO moving of players....only the shifts the game has built in. THIS season you are allowed to move players into position to play a man or zone more effectively, but not for blitzes.

Sorry that's a stupid rule. I understand banning movement of players when it comes to nano blitzing. But illegal to move players around to get better coverage? :what: that makes no sense :why:
 

Rekkapryde

GT, LWO, 49ERS, BRAVES, HAWKS, N4O...yeah UMAD!
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
160,159
Reputation
32,057
Daps
543,683
Reppin
TYRONE GA!
Sorry that's a stupid rule. I understand banning movement of players when it comes to nano blitzing. But illegal to move players around to get better coverage? :what: that makes no sense :why:

I'm open to keepin the rule the same, but I've gotten pms on cats nano-ing. I'm not gonna name names, but the moving of players who are blitzing on a play into better position to be untouched/nano'd is disturbing.
 

Donald J Trump

H.N.I.C
Supporter
Joined
Dec 27, 2012
Messages
36,879
Reputation
-8,242
Daps
68,785
Reppin
USA
I'm open to keepin the rule the same, but I've gotten pms on cats nano-ing. I'm not gonna name names, but the moving of players who are blitzing on a play into better position to be untouched/nano'd is disturbing.

nikka tell mms and silk to stop crying, noone even got the time to look up how to nano :mindblown:

All these damn rules, I did what I had to do to stop silks sleezy stretch play and i did it without calling more than 5 blitzes all game, and i did it with a fukked up controller..

Some times you gotta stack the box, especially on someone who runs stretch left 33% of the time, and stretch right 33% of the other time :wtf:

Man aint nobody nano blitzing, cuz I woulda snitched on their ass by now :mad:

I damn sure dont stack the box against MMS, his fade game is the best I ever faced in my life, bar none :wow:
 

Rekkapryde

GT, LWO, 49ERS, BRAVES, HAWKS, N4O...yeah UMAD!
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
160,159
Reputation
32,057
Daps
543,683
Reppin
TYRONE GA!
nikka tell mms and silk to stop crying, noone even got the time to look up how to nano :mindblown:

All these damn rules, I did what I had to do to stop silks sleezy stretch play and i did it without calling more than 5 blitzes all game, and i did it with a fukked up controller..

Some times you gotta stack the box, especially on someone who runs stretch left 33% of the time, and stretch right 33% of the other time :wtf:

Man aint nobody nano blitzing, cuz I woulda snitched on their ass by now :mad:

I damn sure dont stack the box against MMS, his fade game is the best I ever faced in my life, bar none :wow:

what you did is not illegal, so calm down nikka. :lookherebruh:

The current rule is in place for nano blitzing. That is all. I have no problem with what you did :lookherebruh:
 

Silkk

Can't Change My Damn Avi :beli:
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
215,224
Reputation
22,444
Daps
540,941
@Rekkapryde Lets do away with the restart vs the cpu. If you lose you just lose :mjpls:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Rekkapryde

GT, LWO, 49ERS, BRAVES, HAWKS, N4O...yeah UMAD!
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
160,159
Reputation
32,057
Daps
543,683
Reppin
TYRONE GA!
@Rekkapryde Lets do away with the restart vs the cpu. If you lose you just lose :mjpls:

What part of game freezes don't you understand? That's why I give credit for one this season.

I'm willing to go back to zero restarts like last season and give you slack if the game freezes or the results don't upload.


To do so would require:

1) A VIDEO OF THE GAME FREEZING. EVERYONE HAS SMARTPHONES SO I DON'T WANNA HEAR shyt ABOUT NOT BEING ABLE TO GET A VIDEO

VIDEO REQUIREMENTS
- PROOF THE CONTROLLER IS ON (YOU CAN HIT THE PS HOME BUTTON TO PROVE THE CONTROLLER IS ACTIVE)
- PRESSING OF BUTTONS TO CONFIRM THE FREEZE
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Silkk

Can't Change My Damn Avi :beli:
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
215,224
Reputation
22,444
Daps
540,941
What part of game freezes don't you understand? That's why I give credit for one this season.

I'm willing to go back to zero restarts like last season and give you slack if the game freezes or the results don't upload.


To do so would require:

1) A VIDEO OF THE GAME FREEZING. EVERYONE HAS SMARTPHONES SO I DON'T WANNA HEAR shyt ABOUT NOT BEING ABLE TO GET A VIDEO

VIDEO REQUIREMENTS
- PROOF THE CONTROLLER IS ON (YOU CAN HIT THE PS HOME BUTTON TO PROVE THE CONTROLLER IS ACTIVE)
- PRESSING OF BUTTONS TO CONFIRM THE FREEZE

Cool

But Watch Your Tone Jabroni :ufdup:
 

Don Dada F Poppa

Benchwarmer
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
7,309
Reputation
481
Daps
10,009
Reppin
MD
See, the problem with the moving players rule is if even if someone was moving players to achieve some type of nano blitz, majority of the time it can't be proven since not all replays save, and no one records their games from start to finish, so there's no real way to prove if they did or didn't move to nano unless the replay saves.






You might as well keep the rule as is @Rekkapryde. No one in here nano blitzes (though a couple people who can't stop the run will call some type of cover 0 blitz :mjpls:), and people move players around to get in better position to make plays.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Rekkapryde

GT, LWO, 49ERS, BRAVES, HAWKS, N4O...yeah UMAD!
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
160,159
Reputation
32,057
Daps
543,683
Reppin
TYRONE GA!
See, the problem with the moving players rule is if even if someone was moving players to achieve some type of nano blitz, majority of the time it can't be proven since not all replays save, and no one records their games from start to finish, so there's no real way to prove if they did or didn't move to nano unless the replay saves.

you can do a replay of the previous play if someone nano'd you though.
 

Don Dada F Poppa

Benchwarmer
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
7,309
Reputation
481
Daps
10,009
Reppin
MD
you can do a replay of the previous play if someone nano'd you though.

Bruh, whose stopping mid game to pause and record a replay of a "supposed" nano? And let's not act like you won't have 30 seconds to even record it :youngsabo:







Someone nano blitz you? Cuz you seem hell bent on changing the rule? Whose nano blitzing? I think the dynasty as a collective should know and be presented with evidence on the matter so we can decide what to do about said person(s) :mjpls:
 

Silkk

Can't Change My Damn Avi :beli:
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
215,224
Reputation
22,444
Daps
540,941
you can do a replay of the previous play if someone nano'd you though.

I Dont Even Care Honestly, He's Not An Intelligent Coach Just Has Great Talent.

Just Wanna Make Sure My Schedule Straight Next Year & Im Cool.
 
Top