so you blame the ps3 poor performace on the reviewers. But you'd rather listen to Internet forum fanboy opinions.
Ps3 stans are funny
What poor performance. More people own ps3's then xbox. And xbox had a head start. You see who the prophet is now.
PS4 and 720 to be revealed in MARCH!! PS4 out the door first!
- Thread starter Fatboi1
- Start date
-
- Tags
- gaming playstation 4 ps4
What poor performance. More people own ps3's then xbox. And xbox had a head start. You see who the prophet is now.
Yea because Sony hasn't released move and wonder book
compare exclusives
*all xbots get quiet*
DStyles
Vegan
PS4... poor man's console
Real nikkas gonna get that XB3 (Far better name than xbox 720)
Real nikkas gonna get that XB3 (Far better name than xbox 720)
Ps3 stans are funny
No, the "poor" ps3 performance is the most overhyped cysed shyt by xbox fans ever. And no, I don't listen to any internet forum fanboys, just those who are blinded stans. :lookherebruh:
Black_Jesus
Superstar
I still cant grasp the concept of how an Xb ox stan can utter the words "poor ps3 performance when the best looking games this generation came out on PS3 exclusively..
they do pay MS to use their own online connections to play someone even though i pay (by choice) for PS plus to get games and shyt WEEKLY.....
The numbers of owned systems are pretty much equal. If ps3 didn't have Japan who are very loyal to their own companies there would be no comparison in sales figures.
Sony was the unrivaled leader in sales and marketshare last generation. They have been dead last this entire generation and only now have begun to catch up. I'd say going from first to last is a failure, but you ps3 stans like to ignore reality so I'm sure you'll come up with a reason as to why loosing sales and marketshare is a good thing
It's overhyped yet its been well documented by reviewers and developers. One of the biggest games of last year was damn there unplayable on ps3.
But no the ps3 doesn't have any performance issues, that's just an Internet myth
First off that's not true. Plenty of other games are just as good looking as the "playstation exclusives"
Second if Sony and it's internal studios are the only ones who can develop proper games for the system then the system does have performance issues, or more importantly game developers have issues with sony's system.
Black_Jesus
Superstar
The numbers of owned systems are pretty much equal. If ps3 didn't have Japan who are very loyal to their own companies there would be no comparison in sales figures.
Sony was the unrivaled leader in sales and marketshare last generation. They have been dead last this entire generation and only now have begun to catch up. I'd say going from first to last is a failure, but you ps3 stans like to ignore reality so I'm sure you'll come up with a reason as to why loosing sales and marketshare is a good thing
None of this bullshyt you typed got shyt to do with performance. This shyt is nothing but a popularity contest...
they do pay MS to use their own online connections to play someone even though i pay (by choice) for PS plus to get games and shyt WEEKLY.....
You have a free mediocre service, Xbox users have a paid superior service. It's a matter of personal preferance. If you don't mind paying for quality XBL is the way to go. If you fancy getting your identity stolen, and a bugy, laggy, hacker friendly online environment the PSN is the way to go. It's the PSN+ customers who are getting shafted, they are paying extra money for the same mediocre service and some old usless demos and downloadable games.
The post I quoted had nothing to do with performance. It was about sales so I responded about sales.
Black_Jesus
Superstar
It was easier for them to make the game on xbox and port it to PS3... If that's no longer an issue for next gen systems then what sir?
And please show me a game that looks just as good as GOW, KZ, Uncharted, and Heavy Rain on Xbox...
