Rachel Maddow Has Lost Her Mind & People Are Noticing

[The Fukin Prophecy]

I admire dyke Kurt Angle's persistence not givng up on this Russia thing as it is a massive story of a lifetime if it can be proven (it can and will) but you have to cover some other issues...

Her ratings are at an all time high though so I am assuming that is what her viewers want her to cover otherwise they wouldn't be watching...

 

[Starman]

She is doing the lord's work. When the shyt finally hits the fan,she will be a hero.

 

[fact]

Her ratings are up. She knows her audience.

Bannon does not miss a show, from what I read. This is another case of, if she was telling a different, right leaning narrative, she would be hailed as a hero. Folks can't appreciate the art, if they hate the artist. She has been doing a fantastic job. She has turned into a real pro.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Why she look like an alternate version of Guile from Street Fighter?

​

 

[greenygreen]

...In what way? :bpohh:Genuinely curious.

Yes, Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid U.S. Russian Uranium Deal - Counter Propa
There is a Russian Scandal. But It's Hillary's Scandal.
WikiLeaks - The Podesta Emails

clinton foundation and pedosta got clear ties to russia but rachel maddow wont ever report it and you wont care

matter fact whens the last time she reported actual news? something that actually happened in our physical tangible universe?

 

[smitty22]

Wasn't a issue when Hannity was talking bout Rev Wright everynight in 08
Bae Rachel can talk bout whatever the hell she want

 

[Maschine_Man]

...In what way? :bpohh:Genuinely curious.

LMGTFY

 

[Robbie3000]

Wasn't a issue when Hannity was talking bout Rev Wright everynight in 08
Bae Rachel can talk bout whatever the hell she want

Or Bengazi for like 5 years straight. I'm glad liberals are showing a backbone and going after this administration.




Everything will come to light at some point. Hopefully it's while we can still impeach this orange buffoon.

 

[Black Panther]

Yes, Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid U.S. Russian Uranium Deal - Counter Propa

The Uranium One deal was being formulated while Clinton was campaigning for the presidency in 2007, and likely would have gone through even if she didn't become Secretary of State. She advocated the deal, certainly, but there is no evidence of any quid-pro-quo (Uranium for Clinton Foundation donations). Quoting a separate PolitiFact article than Counter Propa cites:

Did Clinton help Russia obtain uranium for donations? Nope

While it’s conceivable Clinton advocated for the deal, the author of Clinton Cash Peter Schweizer himself admitted that he doesn’t have "direct evidence" proving Clinton played a part. The State Department’s principal representative on the committee, Jose Fernandez, told Time that Clinton "never intervened with me on any CFIUS matter."

She wasn't part of the formulation of the deal. :martinbp:

Trump's suggestion that the Russian deal occurred "while nine investors funneled $145 million to the Clinton Foundation" is not supported by the evidence presented in Clinton Cash.

On the contrary, the donations detailed by author Schweizer occurred at least two years before the deal. Furthermore, it’s not clear from the book whether all nine of the Clinton Foundation donors were actually involved in the Russian deal at all.

As you can see in the chart [see article], the $145 million in donations didn’t happen "while" the Russian deal was occurring in 2010. According to Clinton Cash, five donors contributed $136.4 million at or before a March 2008 benefit hosted by Giustra. While the book doesn’t specify when the other four donated to the Clinton Foundation, we were able to trace another $2.6 million to the March fundraiser.

Furthermore, the bulk of the $145 million comes from Frank Giustra, the founder of UrAsia Energy and a major Clinton Foundation donor. Guistra says he sold all of his stakes in Uranium One in the fall of 2007, "at least 18 months before Hillary Clinton became Secretary of State" and three years before the Russian deal. We couldn’t independently verify Giustra’s claim from UrAsia’s or Uranium One’s public filings.

Assuming Giustra is telling the truth, the donation amount from confirmed Uranium One investors drops from over $145 million to just $4 million. All of these occurred before the Russia deal.

One caveat: The New York Times found that Ian Telfer donated between $1.3 million and $5.6 million to the Clinton Foundation during and after the review process for the Russian deal.

So there’s evidence showing that one man involved with Uranium One (Telfer) donated millions to the Clinton Foundation at the same time as the deal. That certainly doesn’t look good for Hillary Clinton, but it’s a far cry from nine investors funneling $145 million.

[...] Clinton’s State Department was one of nine government agencies to approve Russia’s acquisition of a company with U.S. uranium assets. Nine people related the company at some point in time donated to the Clinton Foundation, but we only found evidence that one did so "while" the Russian deal was occurring. The bulk of the $145 million in donations came two years before the deal.

Trump is certainly within his right to question the indisputable links between Clinton Foundation donors and their ties to Uranium One, but Trump’s charge exaggerates the links. More importantly, his suggestion of a quid pro quo is unsubstantiated, as Schweizer the author of Clinton Cash himself has admitted.

On the most basic level, Trump’s timeline is off. Most of the donations occurred before Clinton was named secretary of state.

 

[I_Got_Da_Burna]

she's unhinged and has gone from credible to hack literally overnight

 

[Black Panther]

LMGTFY

 

[Maschine_Man]

exactly,
If I believed for one second that you or many others here were even somewhat genuine I'd care, but y'all some fake ass mutherfukkers.

 

[the cac mamba]

get this Zuul from ghostbusters lookin bytch outta here she lost all credibility for 'releasing' that fukkin non-story tax return from trump just to get here name more exposure

 

[Black Panther]

exactly,
If I believed for one second that you or many others here were even somewhat genuine I'd care, but y'all some fake ass mutherfukkers.

That neg is real tho

On the serious tip, though, telling someone to "Google" something with no further directions on what sources are credible is why misinformation spreads.

 

[Regular_P]

Wasn't a issue when Hannity was talking bout Rev Wright everynight in 08
Bae Rachel can talk bout whatever the hell she want

That new avi is an issue.