Rachel Maddow Has Lost Her Mind & People Are Noticing

[ill]

The Uranium One deal was being formulated while Clinton was campaigning for the presidency in 2007, and likely would have gone through even if she didn't become Secretary of State. She advocated the deal, certainly, but there is no evidence of any quid-pro-quo (Uranium for Clinton Foundation donations). Quoting a separate PolitiFact article than Counter Propa cites:

Did Clinton help Russia obtain uranium for donations? Nope



She wasn't part of the formulation of the deal. :martinbp:

Think Clintons don't do backroom deals, brehs.

Think they get paid millions for speaking events in Russia (after the uranium sales) for no reason, brehs.

Lmk how they came up on $200 mill when they left office broke...

 

[Zee Scribe]

Wasn't a issue when Hannity was talking bout Rev Wright everynight in 08
Bae Rachel can talk bout whatever the hell she want

Bae? But I think @satam55 is just reacting to being inundated with this shyt. Of course it's a big deal and if no one was talking about it then we'd be asking why. The thing is, every single outlet is talking about ad nauseum. It's like "okay man, we get it....talk about some other shyt." My dudes in the Navajo nation don't have clean water either but no one cares.

 

[Black Panther]

Think Clintons don't do backroom deals, brehs.

Think they get paid millions for speaking events in Russia (after the uranium sales) for no reason, brehs.

Lmk how they came up on $200 mill when they left office broke...

Hillary still is dirty, don't get me wrong. But the claim that we traded Uranium One to the Russians for Clinton Foundation donations--when Clinton wasn't even in charge of that deal--is false.

 

[smitty22]

That new avi is an issue.

:Umadatus:

 

[greenygreen]

Hillary still is dirty, don't get me wrong. But the claim that we traded Uranium One to the Russians for Clinton Foundation donations--when Clinton wasn't even in charge of that deal--is false.

cause politfact says so? you hopeless and dumb and the way you throw negs around is type feminine

 

[BocaRear]

People really need to stop downplaying the role of Russia.
They're actively subverting elections all across the Western world.

 

[CACtain Planet]

I agree that this is a big issue but man that's all she talks about


And then she drags any little detail out


But still we need someone to keep at it


fukk Trump

Shes not the won

 

[Maschine_Man]

That neg is real tho

On the serious tip, though, telling someone to "Google" something with no further directions on what sources are credible is why misinformation spreads.

first off, I don't give ANY fukks about negs on here.
Secondly, if I for one second thought that you or anyone else wanted genuine discourse I'd provide plenty of information, just like I do when I have real discourse with other ppl on here that are actually interested in debate.

Finally, a credible source is only credible so long as you believe what they are saying, no one gives a fukk about proof anymore apparently. If anything that has happened over the last 6+ months have shown you is that ppl have ZERO problems calling something credible if it is on their "side" but are REAL quick to call something else "fake" if it's on the other side. and this goes for all these "credible" sources that many of you like to use, CNN, MSNBC, WAPO, etc., their credibility is no worse than FoxNews and other sources many conveniently write off because they don't follow the same agenda.

My only point here is that there are no 100% credible sources, and anyone claiming they are is a fukking liar. just like anyone AUTOMATICALLY calling something false BECAUSE of where it came from, is equally disingenuous. THAT is how misinformation spreads.


I can literally post a video of something, with real proof, facts, stats, etc., but because that video just happened to be on Foxnews or Infowars or Breitbart or some other organization that doesn't ride for your agenda it's automatically written off as BS.
even with multiple sources, video, references, all types of shyt.
but naw, have some fukkface get on MSNBC or CNN and start talking their opinion on something and all of a sudden it's gospel. naw, fruck that.



y'all want to stop spreading misinformation? STOP picking sides!!!!

 

[Black Panther]

cause politfact says so? you hopeless and dumb and the way you throw negs around is type feminine

Refutation without evidence Give me some evidence that the PolitiFact article is wrong--and I mean specific evidence to this article, not just saying that PolitiFact has been wrong before--and we can talk.

Thought you didn't care about rep :stephena1:

 

[greenygreen]

Refutation without evidence Give me some evidence that the PolitiFact article is wrong--and I mean specific evidence to this article, not just saying that PolitiFact has been wrong before--and we can talk.

Thought you didn't care about rep :stephena1:

possible quid pro quo | Clinton Email Investigation Timeline

i didnt say i cared about rep i said you act like a female

 

[CACtain Planet]

Or Bengazi for like 5 years straight. I'm glad liberals are showing a backbone and going after this administration.




Everything will come to light at some point. Hopefully it's while we can still impeach this orange buffoon.

Who is "we"

 

[mr. smoke weed]

but...she actually DID fukk with Russia.

THAT is the most fukked up part.

Okay she fukked w Russia.....did she collude w them to undermine our election and entire government process? Make her whole potential cabinet full of foreign agents?

 

[Black Panther]

possible quid pro quo | Clinton Email Investigation Timeline

i didnt say i cared about rep i said you act like a female

That same month, Rosatom makes its deal to get a majority stake in Uranium One. However, the deal can’t go forward without approval from a group of US cabinet officials called the Committee on Foreign Investment, including Hillary Clinton as secretary of state. In October 2010, the committee gives its approval. The committee’s decision-making process is shrouded in secrecy, but it is said the approval goes relatively smoothly.

The highlighted portion is where this story falls apart. :mjstare:

-The deal was originally formulated in 2007 without Clinton's involvement--she was campaigning for president at the time, and she wasn't planning on being Secy. of State.
-Clinton was one of nine cabinet officials who had to sign off on the deal; she could not have acted unilaterally.
-The State Department did not lead the decision to sell Uranium One to the Russians; the Secretary of the Treasury headed that deal.
-The only individual who had veto power over the deal was President Obama; no other cabinet member involved could make the decision to execute the deal or not.
-The author of Clinton Cash, who first proposed this story, admits that there's no conclusive evidence of quid-pro-quo in the Uranium One Deal.

Also,

Spoiler: In response to calling me a female

:bpumad:

 

[greenygreen]

Okay she fukked w Russia.....did she collude w them to undermine our election and entire government process? Make her whole potential cabinet full of foreign agents?

no she just sold them the stuff to make nuclear weapons, oh and she trying to take that country to war, so in effect she literally trying to blow up planet so yeah i would say thats worse

 

[Maschine_Man]

Okay she fukked w Russia.....did she collude w them to undermine our election and entire government process? Make her whole potential cabinet full of foreign agents?

Stop thinking one side is better than the other bruh.
Stop thinking one side is doing something different from the others also.

These ppl got you all scared of the big bad Russians when just a few years ago these same ppl had you laughing at Romney with Obama saying the "80's wanted their foreign policy back"

which is it?

I mean, they got you dudes so programmed to believe what they say they can go back and forth and you just follow along like a cat chasing a laser pen.