Ray Allen going to the HOF

stepbackj34spud

Top 75 All-Time
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
32,257
Reputation
-5,509
Daps
65,590
Reppin
BK
Just because he was better in boston doesn't mean he's on a whole other level. Ray's earlier career was equal to pierce. Probably better,

Did you ignore the whole post I made earlier? Paul Pierce was better, period. The only people who argue otherwise are Ray Allen fans. Goodbye.
 

nieman

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2012
Messages
18,071
Reputation
2,736
Daps
36,009
Reppin
Philly
Porter coached 51 games, was fired during the all star break.

Nash averaged 14/10 prior to the break.

Steve Nash

I hadn't looked it up, I was going off memory, but this is what I'm taking about.

November 14 14 33.6 14.6 2.9 7.6 0.6 0.1 3.6 0.9 2.8 0.1 5.1-9.9 .511 1.4-3.4 .426 3.0-3.1 .955 17.3
December 10 10 33.0 14.4 2.9 8.6 1.0 0.0 3.7 1.3 2.7 0.2 5.0-11.4 .439 1.6-3.9 .410 2.8-2.9 .966 16.7

Yes nikka elite. Nash was a fukking beast.
The 2 MVPs (that no one believes he deserved) was going to get him in the HOF. If Nash was a beast, then what was KJ? 20+ & 10+, a few20 something and 11apg seasons...

Antoine never ran the offense in Boston, you sound retarded.

If Ray Allen was a better playmaker than Pierce and had better handle, how come he was never asked to create offense during his time in Boston? Do you know how foolish you sound? Again, be rational. Ray Allen was only better than Pierce at shooting 3s and FTs. That's it.

So Ray didn't handle the ball in Milwaukee and/or Seattle? He wasn't creating offense then? Have you ever saw Ray handles? They're really on the same tier.
 
Top