Reach of the Month: Music Catalogues and AI Rappers

Amo Husserl

All Star
Joined
May 24, 2022
Messages
4,504
Reputation
1,370
Daps
11,726
Because streaming, companies about to catalogue and automate all the artist catalogues they bought to an algorithm.
And have AI generated bots, avatars and holograms here and on metaverse doing playlist of greatest hits.
They won't need to pay royalties anymore when artists sign away the catalogue. It will be a big buyout for artists with enough clout.
Companies might restrict specific catalogues for a listening fee since physical format is phasing out.
They gone collect catalogues and code songwriting programs to put Biggie rhyme schemes over Zaytoven beats with a Justin Bieber hook.
coachella-hip.gif


They won't need to pay rappers for the ear of the culture anymore.
The price of the brick goin' down. Shyt's about to be automated and OD.











They sold future earnings 'cause ain't about to be no big future earnings.
 

Rembrandt

the artist
Joined
Jan 13, 2016
Messages
13,234
Reputation
1,235
Daps
36,461
Reppin
Villa Diodati
You know a music catalogue doesn't involve likeness right?

Oh, you're saying they're gonna use AI rappers over old beats and old choruses?

But if the backlash to AI art and that rapper showed something, a fair amount of people aren't super into this shyt
 

Complexion

ʇdᴉɹɔsǝɥʇdᴉlɟ
Joined
Jan 1, 2018
Messages
6,338
Reputation
5,332
Daps
27,705
I do suspect this is going to be the next wave and artists see it coming in a "roll with us or get rolled over" way as well as expanding their profile to stay current..

Most current songs are formula based anyway. Production def is in most respects. This is just the next level DLC

Like I said:


The future is going to be like nothing we've known....
 

Amo Husserl

All Star
Joined
May 24, 2022
Messages
4,504
Reputation
1,370
Daps
11,726
You know a music catalogue doesn't involve likeness right?

Oh, you're saying they're gonna use AI rappers over old beats and old choruses?

But if the backlash to AI art and that rapper showed something, a fair amount of people aren't super into this shyt
Artists already signed away their likeness in the contract, they didn't sign away the future earnings of their catalogue.
If companies own both, the signed away likeness and content, they can do whatever they want with old beats and choruses.
Worse yet, they can generate "type beats" for AI rappers.


They set it up for later. No backlash two generations later.
They already got y'all on the MPC and in ProTools. Digital.
They might deep fake some stuff for events, most of it will be computer generated.



e0fcdd231a4305b21315154921659eafe878a6c3.gifv


4907642202b33657b1503aa850a81c3714c3c1f9.gifv


 

Rembrandt

the artist
Joined
Jan 13, 2016
Messages
13,234
Reputation
1,235
Daps
36,461
Reppin
Villa Diodati
Artists already signed away their likeness in the contract, they didn't sign away the future earnings of their catalogue.

Links? Because they definitely signed away future earnings of their back catalogue

The plan is for the younger ones like Bieber to make music music since their old catalog isn't huge in 2022 outside select songs
 

Rembrandt

the artist
Joined
Jan 13, 2016
Messages
13,234
Reputation
1,235
Daps
36,461
Reppin
Villa Diodati
Chappelle video in post #4.

I've seen that whole special. Him being on a tv show and them having the rights to that isn't the same as musicians selling their back catalogue

No artist has or is selling their likeness, especially not with a back catalogue.

Actors have contacts where they can possibly use your likeness or clips posthumously ala Carrie Fisher in star wars or Paul walker

Bruce Willis is supposedly selling his likeness

No musicians have or are anytime soon. Dre had to get approval and most likely pay Tupac's estate to do the hologram
 

Rembrandt

the artist
Joined
Jan 13, 2016
Messages
13,234
Reputation
1,235
Daps
36,461
Reppin
Villa Diodati
Now it's absolutely possible for real artists and AI ones to coexist like Hatsune Miku has been around for over a decade and vocaloid are popular

 

Complexion

ʇdᴉɹɔsǝɥʇdᴉlɟ
Joined
Jan 1, 2018
Messages
6,338
Reputation
5,332
Daps
27,705

Longtime music business power player Irving Azoff’s newly launched company Iconic Artists Group struck a deal with the band for an undisclosed sum. Under the terms, Iconic now owns The Beach Boys’ master recordings, a share of their publishing rights, memorabilia, and — perhaps most interestingly — the entire Beach Boys brand, including the members’ likenesses.

tenor.gif

Catalogue sales are just foreplay. This is the literal moneyshot.
 

Amo Husserl

All Star
Joined
May 24, 2022
Messages
4,504
Reputation
1,370
Daps
11,726
What and? Find me any of the multiple artists that sold more than their back catalogue


You keep saying they're selling more or their likeness when they literally aren't
They don't need to sell their likeness if...
Artists already signed away their likeness in the contract,
Individuals do not have an absolute ownership right in their names or likenesses. But the law does give individuals certain rights of “privacy” and “publicity” which provide limited rights to control how your name, likeness, or other identifying information is used under certain circumstances. These laws vary from state to state, so they are difficult to summarize.
"and" is a conjunction, "a word used to connect clauses or sentences or to coordinate words in the same clause (e.g. and, but, if )."

Sign away likeness first and sell catalogue later.
 

Rembrandt

the artist
Joined
Jan 13, 2016
Messages
13,234
Reputation
1,235
Daps
36,461
Reppin
Villa Diodati
They don't need to sell their likeness if...


"and" is a conjunction, "a word used to connect clauses or sentences or to coordinate words in the same clause (e.g. and, but, if )."

Sign away likeness first and sell catalogue later.

Yes, to the record label for the duration of your contract.

That's 0 to do with the selling of the back catalogue.
 

Rembrandt

the artist
Joined
Jan 13, 2016
Messages
13,234
Reputation
1,235
Daps
36,461
Reppin
Villa Diodati

Longtime music business power player Irving Azoff’s newly launched company Iconic Artists Group struck a deal with the band for an undisclosed sum. Under the terms, Iconic now owns The Beach Boys’ master recordings, a share of their publishing rights, memorabilia, and — perhaps most interestingly — the entire Beach Boys brand, including the members’ likenesses.

tenor.gif

Catalogue sales are just foreplay. This is the literal moneyshot.

Whitney did the same. I'm not saying it's never happening, even more so with dead artists. But this is rare.

And even then, they're talking things like a beach boys restaurant. I wouldn't take a band that had most of the original members die, went basically broke and flopped as indictive of anything

Considering the vast majority aren't and the two examples are a mismanaged, possibly desperate estate and a desperate band
 
Top