Red pill Manosphere podcaster cac gets taken down HARD and exposed for not living what he preaches.

[Scaaar]

Let me make this crystal clear before posters start getting it twisted … I am not defending this dude at all


My position is this woman who is a feminist bringing up his wife’s children and pass failed marriages /relationships is completely out of pocket.
Now, if he was debating another man who said the same exact thing as she did then that would be fair game.
The problem is a feminist supposed to support and protect her fellow females … so yes, her bringing up his wife’s failed previous relationships to attack him automatically makes it attack on his wife’s as well

The best analogy I can give you
Say there’s a debate between Cynthia G vs ‘insert sad typical Black Manosphere dude’
And the dude says to Cynthia well you flew from Seattle to the Carolinas passing three times zones to get with a dude to impregnate you who had five children from five different baby mothers … every individual will understand that is attack on Cynthia G and an attack on Rob the dude who impregnated her.


I hope I clarified my stance on this

There's always one "Stephen"" that will cape for the wyte man. The issue here is his hypocrisy. He spends a majority of his time making bread off young dudes and telling them not to date women that are promiscuous and have multiple kids out of wedlock only for the mirror to be placed on him and he does the exact same thing lol. She called him out for not practicing what he preached and spazzed out which tells you that even he knows what he's doing is foul. Then he did the least masculine thing which is to call his wife in for backup to fight his fight for him

 

[Mission249]

Let me make this crystal clear before posters start getting it twisted … I am not defending this dude at all


My position is this woman who is a feminist bringing up his wife’s children and pass failed marriages /relationships is completely out of pocket.
Now, if he was debating another man who said the same exact thing as she did then that would be fair game.
The problem is a feminist supposed to support and protect her fellow females … so yes, her bringing up his wife’s failed previous relationships to attack him automatically makes it attack on his wife’s as well


I hope I clarified my stance on this

She's just calling out hypocrisy, not hating on the wife.

It's like when some dude is shyt talking about gays, then some woman brings up the fact that the shyt talker is known to be on the down low.

That woman would be calling out the hypocrisy, not calling out being gay.

 

[Amo Husserl]

"Baby daddy". It has begun...

 

[Canon]

People actually defending this dude in here

they prob sit around and watch him debate 19 year olds all day

 

[kingofnyc]

"Your wife has 3 baby daddies."

That is a plain fact. Had he taken it as such there's no insult in it. It only becomes that when you add in his own hypocrisy and need to defend his lies. She's not shaming the woman as much as she is destroying his facade.

Again you can't separate the fact that his wife is supporting her husband's grifting. She's allowing him to degrade herself and other women for profit. Why would any feminist respect her? She's not worthy of protection.

well props to you for pointing out his wife is on the same grift … cause if that is the case then that changes the dynamics of this whole topic

There's always one "Stephen"" that will cape for the wyte man. The issue here is his hypocrisy. He spends a majority of his time making bread off young dudes and telling them not to date women that are promiscuous and have multiple kids out of wedlock only for the mirror to be placed on him and he does the exact same thing lol. She called him out for not practicing what he preached and spazzed out which tells you that even he knows what he's doing is foul. Then he did the least masculine thing which is to call his wife in for backup to fight his fight for him

I’ve said multiple multiple times I’m not defending this dude
I literally have no dog in this fight and don’t even know who the hell he is
My point has been consistent , the feminist bringing up his wife’s past is an attack on him and her now the poster above is saying they both have this grifting thing going on and if that is true, then that change the dynamics of my opinions

She's just calling out hypocrisy, not hating on the wife.

It's like when some dude is shyt talking about gays, then some woman brings up the fact that the shyt talker is known to be on the down low.

That woman would be calling out the hypocrisy, not calling out being gay.

I completely understand she’s calling out his hypocrisy, which is absolute true
But with that said you can’t ignore that his wife having three kids from three different baby father is a bad reflection on her

 

[Cat piss martini]

That was pure Ether.
He couldnt hold back the sassyness.

 

[Uchiha God]

Let me make this crystal clear before posters start getting it twisted … I am not defending this dude at all


My position is this woman who is a feminist bringing up his wife’s children and pass failed marriages /relationships is completely out of pocket.
Now, if he was debating another man who said the same exact thing as she did then that would be fair game.
The problem is a feminist supposed to support and protect her fellow females … so yes, her bringing up his wife’s failed previous relationships to attack him automatically makes it attack on his wife’s as well

What you saying makes no sense because being a feminist and being critical of women aren't mutually exclusive things. In fact, feminists often criticize women albeit often in relation to how they present themselves to and/or what they do for men. Do you think the term "pick-me" for example, is a term of endearment or something?

Moreover, again, in this clip, she didn't present the fact that this dude's wife has 3 BDs as a criticism of the woman - but rather as a criticism of him and the fallacies in his stances.

 

[DPresidential]

None of these uber-red pills dudes live it like they talk it. None of them.

 

[kingofnyc]

You're a bozo. Everyone understands your point. The problem is that you're a fool who expects other people to be stifled by the fallacies you use as a shield.

Going by your logic, we would not be able to call people out on their double standards. This is the logic a lot of right wing lunatics try to enforce on the world; you can't point out my hypocrisy because my actions are something you support.

That is not how the world works. The woman actually made it clear that she did not disapprove of women having children from different fathers. What she did was apply his life to the standard he promotes. That is fair game.

You are riding his meat, quite shamefully at that.

my bad you’re not a bozo nor a idiot you’re a fukking retard

It’s not my logic. It is actual facts if you’re going to use someone calling out another person for their double standards or hypocrisy at the end of the day it ultimately essentially means the person being used is getting attacked as well.

I just gave you the perfect apples to apples analogy with Cynthia G and Rob which blew up the whole YouTube streets many years ago
That woman built her whole based off shytting on black men calling us dusty’s , bandits, dirty , deadbeats etc., etc. yet she went out and got with the same exact BM that she shytted on

And when all the black Manosphere dudes used her situation it was an attack on her & Rob as well
And he got to the point where he had to go on his YouTube platform to address the whole situation
so again tell me how this feminist bringing up his wife’s negative past is not an attack on her decision she made prior to getting with him



and lastly, for the fukking record …. I have no fukking idea who this dude is & can give 2 fukks

 

[Wig Twistin Season]

That guy is a masochist and enjoys humiliation. The tough guy schtick is just a cover.

 

[O.Red]

Typical right-winger. Acts superior and condescendent, then starts yelling slurs when someone calls them out on their bullshyt because that's all they really got.

He calls himself a "great orator" too

This is how they move through the world

 

[Supa]

well props to you for pointing out his wife is on the same grift … cause if that is the case then that changes the dynamics of this whole topic

I don't know shyt about his wife other than what's in these clips. I never heard of this guy and don't pay attention to these grifters.

The point is she knows what he does, how he makes his money, and what his messaging is. The man insults women like her for profit so she is complicit in the grift.

She's basically like the wives of mob bosses or kingpins. They're not innocent when they know how their husbands get their money. They don't say anything because they're getting Gucci bags, a nice house, and cars.

 

[horizon]

Wheres da take down?

I saw a man not allowing sum1 to bad talk his wife. Where was the take down.

I saw a female who had to go str8 to the family shots instead of going back at him directly

Captain Save-a-Simp to the rescue

 

[jilla82]

This whole thing actually started before the video in the OP

Wilson had a "debate" with a breh and it got heated.
The white side of the manosphere caught feelings on how things went and "cancelled" the breh

There are tons of reaction videos about Coach Greg Adams and Andrew Wilsons debate

That whole debacle led up to Wilson debating with the white girl and her calling him out





This is them giving Wilson a pep talk

 

[Adeptus Astartes]

His wife is fighting for her life, too.

And even this dude's rationalization is off. He's not a "former drug addict". He's more akin to an active user. He apparently tells people to avoid the very type of woman he married, and routinely insults those types of women and the men who marry them.