You are an idiot. You don't have the foundation required to start to understand why you are in the wrong.
are you a female because you are coming off wayyyyyy …. too emotional?The woman in the video compared his rhetoric to the life he's living; in this situation, his choice in wife. That is not an attack, it is an appropriate observation. He took offence to it because he knows that it is at odds with what he preaches.
It is odd that you're bringing up Cythia G. What's the end goal with this? To demonstrate that women will also be called out when their choices don't align with their rhetoric.
And you evidently give more than 2 fukks. A whiff of feminism is all it took for your to put on your cape and stand in front of that bozo. If you're not familiar with rhetoric, why else are you defending him from a statement of fact that proves hypocrisy.
You clown.
That clown is just looking to argue to argue.You are an idiot. You don't have the foundation required to start to understand why you are in the wrong.
The woman in the video compared his rhetoric to the life he's living; in this situation, his choice in wife. That is not an attack, it is an appropriate observation. He took offence to it because he knows that it is at odds with what he preaches.
It is odd that you're bringing up Cythia G. What's the end goal with this? To demonstrate that women will also be called out when their choices don't align with their rhetoric.
And you evidently give more than 2 fukks. A whiff of feminism is all it took for your to put on your cape and stand in front of that bozo. If you're not familiar with rhetoric, why else are you defending him from a statement of fact that proves hypocrisy.
You clown.
Exactly. Because she couldn't press him directly, she attached his wife.Wheres da take down?
I saw a man not allowing sum1 to bad talk his wife. Where was the take down.
I saw a female who had to go str8 to the family shots instead of going back at him directly
Wheres da take down?
I saw a man not allowing sum1 to bad talk his wife. Where was the take down.
I saw a female who had to go str8 to the family shots instead of going back at him directly
She had bud triggered ass spiraling by merely mentioning his wife had kids before him. They supposed to be red pill, but marrying a BM with kids.He acting like telling her that she gets more p*ssy than him is a burn.She ate his ass up.
Never in life is eating box a bad thing.
Most men don't actually live by that redpill BS. That's why I ignore the losers who try and insult me. Baby you will ALWAYS be lonelier and sadder than me...DEAL WIT IT.

She didn't bad talk his wife. There's not necessarily anything wrong with women having children with different men ...

Because I don't consider someone eating coochie wrong I'm gay?Damn. So you're gay now

Hell King of the Hill outed these guys as bytchesShe didn't Even GET to say what she was trying to get to before he Bytched out and started over talking and Name-calling...
Didn't 8 tell y'all these Gurus and manosphere dudes don't be living what they talk? They are ALL real life Losers and are NEVER in the type of relationships they are telling YOU that you should be in .
![]()
She didn't attack the wife, she directly attacked him using his wife as a weapon. He (and other redpillers like him) attack women like his wife all the time as well as the men who marry women like her.Exactly. Because she couldn't press him directly, she attached his wife.
Because I don't consider someone eating coochie wrong I'm gay?
![]()
I dunno. You going to the wrong side will explain all your extra venom against men over the past bit.
You avoiding the question and being mad about eaters has YOU looking funny in the light.I dunno. You going to the wrong side will explain all your extra venom against men over the past bit.

we can't laugh at them?Do we need this Caucasian bs here