Remember when the Coli thought Jabari Parker > Julius Randle?

Status
Not open for further replies.
G

Gil Scott-Heroin

✊🏿
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
88,680
Reputation
9,958
Daps
239,111
KOBE said:
I have the worst reading comprehension because I quoted you word for word and then after the fact you tried changing what you meant?:russ:
.
Click to expand...
:merchant:

How the fukk did I change what I meant when I said specifically in that very post he wouldn't average a high # of minutes because of his redundant skillset? I NEVER said he'd get the same minutes as Parker. For the very fact he has a redundant skillset if he'd be on the Bucks, you couldn't and he wouldn't play him 32 minutes as the 2nd option. Use your brain.
KOBE said:
This is what you said:

""Randle wouldn't average the same amount of rebounds he does now if he played Parker's role on the Bucks. ""

If he had Parker's role on the Bucks. Not some reduced role with less minutes because some MORE bullshyt HYPOTHETICALS that you keep trying to use as legitimate points. The SAME role is what you said initially and then you tried spinning it.
Click to expand...
:snoop:

This is why you need to read properly before responding next time. You're to gungho trying to push this agenda that you don't read the finer details. Never mind the fact that even if you were to take it as not a reduced role, if you knew what you were talking about you would know that Randle wouldn't be able to grab the defensive rebound and push the ball like he does currently, if he were on the Bucks (Giannis does that).
 
CantStop

CantStop

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
46,970
Reputation
9,327
Daps
211,668
KOBE said:
Really shows growth on your part as a basketball poster when you can change your stance on things when new information comes out and you have a better understanding. If only Jabari fans were this astute and could change their wrong opinion in this debate when we have a new Randle this year. :wow:
Click to expand...

When presented with facts, tell the other poster to watch the games - Jabari fans

Their arguments are as efficient as Jabari's offense. :scust:

We Randle supporters are versatile like Julius himself. We can post regular stats, advanced stats, and highlights. That triple double. :wow:
 
KOBE

KOBE

Superstar
Joined
Apr 30, 2014
Messages
7,712
Reputation
1,100
Daps
34,362
Gil Scott-Heroin said:
:merchant:

How the fukk did I change what I meant when I said specifically in that very post he wouldn't average a high # of minutes because of his redundant skillset? I NEVER said he'd get the same minutes as Parker. For the very fact he has a redundant skillset if he'd be on the Bucks, you couldn't and he wouldn't play him 32 minutes as the 2nd option. Use your brain.

:snoop:

This is why you need to read properly before responding next time. You're to gungho trying to push this agenda that you don't read the finer details. Never mind the fact that even if you were to take it as not a reduced role, if you knew what you were talking about you would know that Randle wouldn't be able to grab the defensive rebound and push the ball like he does currently, if he were on the Bucks (Giannis does that).
Click to expand...

Jabari Parker would average less of everything on the Lakers because he'd get less opportunities, less chances with the ball to do his iso shyt, and eventually be replaced by Nance in the starting lineup when Luke would decide that he's a better fit in the starting lineup than Parker as Parker's skillset and passing just isn't cutting it.


See? I can make up complete bullshyt too.
 
G

Gil Scott-Heroin

✊🏿
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
88,680
Reputation
9,958
Daps
239,111
KOBE said:
I co-signed? I dapped it because cantstop brings legitimate points to this thread rather than making up hypotheticals.


Actually I said you don't know how to take L's, which is apparent to anyone that keeps up with this thread.




It was just piling on the statistics that Randle holds over Jabari.
Click to expand...
:mindblown:

How the fukk can you say @CantStop brought up a legitimate point + piling on the statistics by referencing RPM and then in another thread say that RPM is a bullshyt statistic and ESPN has no credibility.

So in this thread RPM is a legitimate statistic but anywhere else on this board it's a bullshyt statistic?

:dead:
 
G

Gil Scott-Heroin

✊🏿
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
88,680
Reputation
9,958
Daps
239,111
KOBE said:
Jabari Parker would average less of everything on the Lakers because he'd get less opportunities, less chances with the ball to do his iso shyt, and eventually be replaced by Nance in the starting lineup when Luke would decide that he's a better fit in the starting lineup than Parker as Parker's skillset and passing just isn't cutting it.


See? I can make up complete bullshyt too.
Click to expand...
It doesn't work like that because you're not providing the proper context. You're just throwing a bunch a shyt out there based on absolutely nothing. Not to mention Parker is a good passer and displays it on occasion when he's giving the opportunity to do so, except that's not his role on the Bucks and it would conflict with Giannis' role. Jabari would be great playing next to Mozgov and give the the Lakers more offensive production in the froncourt and more space for the wings/guards because of his ability to stretch the floor.
 
KOBE

KOBE

Superstar
Joined
Apr 30, 2014
Messages
7,712
Reputation
1,100
Daps
34,362
Gil Scott-Heroin said:
:mindblown:

How the fukk can you say @CantStop brought up a legitimate point + piling on the statistics by referencing RPM and then in another thread say that RPM is a bullshyt statistic and ESPN has no credibility.

So in this thread RPM is a legitimate statistic but anywhere else on this board it's a bullshyt statistic?

:dead:
Click to expand...

Whose reading comprehension is bad now?:usure:

He brings up legitimate pointS. Notice the "s"? That means I'm using a word in the plural format, meaning he brings up MULTIPLE points, not just a single one, to this thread every day. Keep up.

Same thing with the statistics part. It just adds to the list of stats that favor Randle over Jabari.


Gil Scott-Heroin said:
It doesn't work like that because you're not providing the proper context. You're just throwing a bunch a shyt out there based on absolutely nothing. Not to mention Parker is a good passer and displays it on occasion when he's giving the opportunity to do so, except that's not his role on the Bucks and it would conflict with Giannis' role. Jabari would be great playing next to Mozgov and give the the Lakers more offensive production in the froncourt and more space for the wings/guards because of his ability to stretch the floor.
Click to expand...

Oh it doesn't work like that? Oh so Bucks had Randle their roster would be exactly the same and would he'd still be made redundant rather than having the roster made more suited for him and Giannis being on the team together? Gotcha, clearly hypotheticals only make sense when you do them. :troll:

Jabari ain't stretching shyt with his 30% shooting from 3 and the Lakers have plenty of offensive production as it is. Him being on our team would limit the excellent passing that has been on display this season and he'd be too often found trying to go one on one against players rather than playing within the offense, quickly leading him to the bench.
 
Newzz

Newzz

"The Truth" always prevails
Supporter
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
44,924
Reputation
7,480
Daps
104,638
Gil Scott-Heroin said:
i) :mjlol:
ii) Russell is having a mediocre season - mostly getting carried by career 6th men instead of taking over the league like y'all Lakers stans were projecting at the start of the season. You've got nothing to stick your chest out about.
ii) What does another 10 games have to do with anything? If you can't provide some commentary/context on how both players have been performing this season with those box score #s that you're going to throw at the wall - don't bother
iii) Regardless of what happens in a 20-game span, it still won't take away from Mudiay having more potential, which is what I've argued since D1.
Click to expand...

Didn't read:umad:



Save it for the Russell vs Mudiay aka John Wall version 2 (Still ridiculous to even THINK you typed it...but you did:dead:) thread:smugbiden:
 
G

Gil Scott-Heroin

✊🏿
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
88,680
Reputation
9,958
Daps
239,111
KOBE said:
Whose reading comprehension is bad now?:usure:

He brings up legitimate pointS. Notice the "s"? That means I'm using a word in the plural format, meaning he brings up MULTIPLE points, not just a single one, to this thread every day. Keep up.

Same thing with the statistics part. It just adds to the list of stats that favor Randle over Jabari..
Click to expand...
:dead:

But you're still arguing that him bringing up RPM is a legitimate point and saying it's a bullshyt stat in another thread. What is wrong with you? If you were really bout it, you wouldn't have cosigned his post/point and told him that it's a bullshyt stat and that it shouldn't be used. That agenda is skrong.
KOBE said:
Oh it doesn't work like that? Oh so Bucks had Randle their roster would be exactly the same and would he'd still be made redundant rather than having the roster made more suited for him and Giannis being on the team together? Gotcha, clearly hypotheticals only make sense when you do them. :troll:

Jabari ain't stretching shyt with his 30% shooting from 3 and the Lakers have plenty of offensive production as it is. Him being on our team would limit the excellent passing that has been on display this season and he'd be too often found trying to go one on one against players rather than playing within the offense, quickly leading him to the bench.
Click to expand...
i) Stretching the floor doesn't just mean shooting 3s. He's far more of a threat in PnP situations and coming off screens. Bigs would be forced to come out of the paint rather than camp near it like they do with Randle.
ii) Randle's playmaking isn't anything special and is certainly not something the Lakers starting lineup couldn't replace if Jabari started instead
iii) Yeah you're clueless and clearly don't watch the Bucks play if you think him trying to go one-on-one isn't a byproduct of the Bucks shytty offensive personnel but a tendency to dominate the ball.

LOL at Jabari not playing within the offense when he's asked to be a go-to scorer. You can't make this shyt up. Randle can play a faux playmaker role of making basic ass passes because he's got shooters around him. Picture him trying to do that shyt in Milwaukee with Delly, Snell and Giannis as shooting options....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top