Yeah, no one puts an item in a backpack before paying for it in a convenience store. The two dollars might've been to pay for something else, cause it wasn't to pay for the juice in the backpack. The clerk's response was outrageous without people trying to absolve the girl of shoplifting; a bottle of juice is not something to die for.
I was reading a story earlier today where a seventeen year old kid had burglarized this white woman's home, the bytch gets an alert on her phone or whatev, goes to her house and finds the kid coming out a window and shoots him dead. The sister of the kid is on TV saying the lady didn't have to shoot him (right) and her brother was from the hood and how else was he supposed to buy clothes to go to school (fukking wrong), along with some other ridiculous hyperbole.
The lady is in the wrong for shooting the kid, that's bad enough. Her life wasn't in danger, and even the police have said she should've called the them instead. Why the fukk would nikkas then add bullshyt about how dude had no choice but to commit burglary and he was a technical college student who loved learning and had a bright future? This is like the nikka who said Mike Brown was walking around telling dudes about Jesus before he got shot.
That kind of shyt does not help a case, because when the evidence shows a nikka is not the angel that he is being made out to be, the judge and the jury then wonders if the defense's narrative is the truth instead. Then the overall narrative becomes it's okay to shoot a motherfukker because the prosecution's witnesses are a buncha lying ass nikkas trying to protect a violent scumbag.
tragic end, thru Pac
