Republicans seeking to criminally charge doctor who provided abortion to 10-year old rape victim.

[Lord Beasley]

you got candace-owens-adjacent mfs who will say you need to support these sick mfs because the current admin is doing a bad job. these are the dumb pieces of shyt that they gotta deal with. that both sides shyt doesnt float, the GOP is full of demonic sickos

 

[fact]

I believe she was raped (statutory?) by an illegal immigrant too.

Republicans straight up care more for abortion rights than rape/ illegal immigration. Must have been hard for them lol

a fukking 10yo? the fact you typed statutory with a question mark is fukking disgusting. WTF breh?

 

[Reflected]

a fukking 10yo? the fact you typed statutory with a question mark is fukking disgusting. WTF breh?

I'm going to give the benefit of doubt and assume a misunderstanding of the term "statutory".

 

[StretfordRed]

a fukking 10yo? the fact you typed statutory with a question mark is fukking disgusting. WTF breh?

Yes. I dont know the legal differences in the US as I’m from the UK.

Statutory rape is legally classed and charged differently than violent/forcible rape. But that’s just the legal definition/differences.

In common law jurisdictions, statutory rape is nonforcible sexual activity in which one of the individuals is below the age of consent (the age required to legally consent to the behavior)

I’m saying I dont know if she was literally kidnapped, raped and got pregnant or whether he was a relative who molested groomed her. I doubt it’s the latter as he is an illegal immigrant.

Either way the focus shouldn’t be on him at this stage. It’s making sure the doctor isn’t charged and the girl has the abortion safely and gets the help she’ll need for the rest of her life.

 

[Reflected]

Yes. I dont know the legal differences
in the US as I’m from the UK.

Statutory rape is legally classed and charged differently than violent/forcible rape. But that’s just the legal definition.

For clarification, you are only questioning the legal distinction of the two charges possibly brought towards the suspect, right? Because on the morality side of things, it's always going to be forcible with a 10 year old considering a 10 year old doesn't have anywhere near the mental capacity to consent to sex. If it's a moral approach, it would be another case of why people shouldn't derive morality from law.

 

[StretfordRed]

For clarification, you are only questioning the legal distinction of the two charges possibly brought towards the suspect, right? Because on the morality side of things, it's always going to be forcible with a 10 year old considering a 10 year old doesn't have anywhere near the mental capacity to consent to sex. If it's a moral approach, it would be another case of why people shouldn't derive morality from law.

Yeah I explained above. I’m on a phone so can’t type paragraphs. But literally just didn’t know how to define his crime.

I appreciate the mild mannered response. I literally just didn’t know if there was a difference, hence the question mark.

 

[Wepa Man]

WTF is wrong with that party

 

[Wepa Man]

I'm pro life but there are certain times when abortion is common sense

rape
when mothers health at risk
deformed fetus

You mom should have aborted you ass.

 

[Reflected]

Yeah I explained above. I’m on a phone so can’t type paragraphs. But literally just didn’t know how to define his crime.

I appreciate the mild mannered response. I literally just didn’t know if there was a difference.

To be fair, your comment should be recognized as such considering the term is a legal term, at least to my understanding, and I wouldn't expect to encounter it in moral discussions. But you should edit your original post with clarification. Because I can see how it comes off as though your are approaching it from a moral perspective.

 

[the elastic]

Right wing likes to go on about pizzagate & protecting kids from the gays but are straight up doing evil shyt like this in the open.

 

[StretfordRed]

To be fair, your comment should be recognized as such considering the term is a legal term, at least to my understanding, and I wouldn't expect to encounter it in moral discussions. But you should edit your original post with clarification. Because I can see how it comes off as though your are approaching it from a moral perspective.

Yeah I added a clarification!

This was a purely legal question and definitely not about morality. No way, no how.

 

[Lord Beasley]

Right wing likes to go on about pizzagate & protecting kids from the gays but are straight up doing evil shyt like this in the open.

BOTH SIDES

 

[Worthless Loser]

When the Indiana AG did a interview on Fox News last night they posted that doctor picture. If something happens to that doctor Fox News got blood on their hands.

 

[King Jove]

When the Indiana AG did a interview on Fox News last night they posted that doctor picture. If something happens to that doctor Fox News got blood on their hands.

wouldn't be the first time

Bill O’Reilly in hot seat after Kan. murder

The shooting death of abortion provider George Tiller has put Fox News Channel’s Bill O’Reilly in the media spotlight because of stories he did about the Kansas doctor over the past few…

www.hollywoodreporter.com

 

[Reflected]

When the Indiana AG did a interview on Fox News last night they posted that doctor picture. If something happens to that doctor Fox News got blood on their hands.

That's pretty fukking ridiculous. Can't the doctor take them to court over that? I hope so.