you got candace-owens-adjacent mfs who will say you need to support these sick mfs because the current admin is doing a bad job. these are the dumb pieces of shyt that they gotta deal with. that both sides shyt doesnt float, the GOP is full of demonic sickos
Republicans seeking to criminally charge doctor who provided abortion to 10-year old rape victim.
- Thread starter RamsayBolton
- Start date
I'm going to give the benefit of doubt and assume a misunderstanding of the term "statutory".
StretfordRed
Afro-European
Yes. I dont know the legal differences in the US as I’m from the UK.
Statutory rape is legally classed and charged differently than violent/forcible rape. But that’s just the legal definition/differences.
I’m saying I dont know if she was literally kidnapped, raped and got pregnant or whether he was a relative who molested groomed her. I doubt it’s the latter as he is an illegal immigrant.
Either way the focus shouldn’t be on him at this stage. It’s making sure the doctor isn’t charged and the girl has the abortion safely and gets the help she’ll need for the rest of her life.
Last edited:
For clarification, you are only questioning the legal distinction of the two charges possibly brought towards the suspect, right? Because on the morality side of things, it's always going to be forcible with a 10 year old considering a 10 year old doesn't have anywhere near the mental capacity to consent to sex. If it's a moral approach, it would be another case of why people shouldn't derive morality from law.
StretfordRed
Afro-European
Yeah I explained above. I’m on a phone so can’t type paragraphs. But literally just didn’t know how to define his crime.
I appreciate the mild mannered response. I literally just didn’t know if there was a difference, hence the question mark.
You mom should have aborted you ass.
To be fair, your comment should be recognized as such considering the term is a legal term, at least to my understanding, and I wouldn't expect to encounter it in moral discussions. But you should edit your original post with clarification.
Because I can see how it comes off as though your are approaching it from a moral perspective.
Right wing likes to go on about pizzagate & protecting kids from the gays but are straight up doing evil shyt like this in the open.
StretfordRed
Afro-European
To be fair, your comment should be recognized as such considering the term is a legal term, at least to my understanding, and I wouldn't expect to encounter it in moral discussions. But you should edit your original post with clarification.
Yeah I added a clarification!
This was a purely legal question and definitely not about morality. No way, no how.
Last edited:
BOTH SIDES
Worthless Loser
Blackpilled
When the Indiana AG did a interview on Fox News last night they posted that doctor picture. If something happens to that doctor Fox News got blood on their hands.
King Jove
King Of †he Gawds
wouldn't be the first time
Bill O’Reilly in hot seat after Kan. murder
The shooting death of abortion provider George Tiller has put Fox News Channel's Bill O'Reilly in the media spotlight because of stories he did about the Kansas doctor over the past few years.
www.hollywoodreporter.com
That's pretty fukking ridiculous. Can't the doctor take them to court over that? I hope so.