Stop it.Thanks to a sweet deal between friends that isn't as one sided as many believe.
It's notStop it.
It's not a 50/50 trade. So what do you peg it at?It's not
didn't say it was 50/50, but cats acting like Luka got traded for Draymond Green and shyt.It's not a 50/50 trade. So what do you peg it at?
I know you're not saying it's 50/50, I'm asking you how one-sided you think it is.didn't say it was 50/50, but cats acting like Luka got traded for Draymond Green and shyt.
I dont see Luka bein nowhere near the level he playing at in 4 or 5 yearsI know you're not saying it's 50/50, I'm asking you how one-sided you think it is.
AD is probably way better than people are giving him credit for and it's still a really bad trade for Dallas.
AD is probably way better than people are giving him credit for and it's still a really bad trade for Dallas.
Pretty much how I feel.
is the new owners are casino owners and you know how they are with risks/odds and if they didn't think Luka was worth keeping, it does make you say
![]()
I honestly think it was a perfect storm of events. New ownership are not basketball people, Luka's probably annoying as fukk and a drunk, they didn't want to supermax him, Nico has been infatuated with AD for years.
Winning for them is making money and getting that casino built out there. The basketball shyt is inconsequential to them.True, but that risk/gambling perspective of the owners does worry me. Vegas never loses.
they also didn't wanna pay him almost 70 mill/year for a reason.Winning for them is making money and getting that casino built out there. The basketball shyt is inconsequential to them.