Eye Cue DA COLI GAWD
<--- Cleveland Browns winning that many, boi!
This is a pitiful argument to make for the HOF but this is era we're in -- funny money stats rule the day
Richard Sherman on Matthew Stafford’s HOF case
- Thread starter Street Knowledge
- Start date
Eye Cue DA COLI GAWD
<--- Cleveland Browns winning that many, boi!
Wining a Super Bowl in the most watered down league year in last 20 years doesn't mean shyt when talking about the HOF. Despite the league being average, Stafford was not great during the regular season or playoffs, not to mention he played in a dome.
You nikkas always fall for the okie doke with these QBs man. Stafford ain't no HOF ... fukk outa here
You nikkas always fall for the okie doke with these QBs man. Stafford ain't no HOF ... fukk outa here
AlbertPullhoez
The Takeover
The names ahead of him: Brady, Brees, Peyton, Favre, Rothlisberger, Rivers, Marino, Rodgers, Elway, Eli, and Tarkenton. He could potentially end his career with 60K passing yards and over 400 TD's.
Only 7 QB's have done that and only 6 have done that and won a ring. He's getting in
5014 Yards
38 TDs
15 INT
65.9 CMP%
97.7 RATE
14 TDs/7 INT 4th Qt
vs
4886 Yards
41 TDs
17 INT
67.2 CMP%
102.9 RATE
12 TD/ 0 INT 4th Qt
One is a guy on your list and the other is Matt Stafford. Who is better?
Last edited:
filial_piety
Banned
Wining a Super Bowl in the most watered down league year in last 20 years doesn't mean shyt when talking about the HOF. Despite the league being average, Stafford was not great during the regular season or playoffs, not to mention he played in a dome.
You nikkas always fall for the okie doke with these QBs man. Stafford ain't no HOF ... fukk outa here
I don't think he does either....he has numbers, but they have to materialize from something like awards, winning records, multiple playoff appearances etc...his numbers are fluff imo...alot of "empty calorie" stats from a losing record. He just doesn't have itNow if he can put together a string of playoff appearances, a few all pros, pro bowls and another chip...i think he does...but right now? nah people are living in the moment
Cmon man..
It can’t just be about stats…
You dudes keep doin this shyt…
Stafford did what he was brought to LA to do. Congratulations to him but this doesn’t mean he’s a HOF QB right now
Passing stats in this era are all skewed all these passers have great numbers..
fukkin Dak Prescott who everyone thinks is a manager and can’t carry threw 37 tds and 10 picks this year
All these numbers are inflated as hell
fukkin Dak Prescott who everyone thinks is a manager and can’t carry threw 37 tds and 10 picks this year
All these numbers are inflated as hell
That may be true, but has Stafford ever been in MVP consideration?
If its not about stats, then how are you quantifying who is better? Wins? Playoff success? Gut feeling? Madden rating?
Break it down
get these nets
Veteran
Doubt it.
Eye Cue DA COLI GAWD
<--- Cleveland Browns winning that many, boi!
I'm talking right now. And yeah, based on the 'consistency route', he has a way in, but he'd still be sitting at the little kids HOF table if he got in.
Only issue with the "Well, by the end of his career, this guy could have 90k bazillion yards and a billion TDs" argument is that you have a slew of QB coming up putting up same inflated stats, and all them won't get in.
It’s all those things….
What Stafford has done to this point to me is not HOF worthy….
He needs to do more
My standards are different though I take this HOF shyt serious
If Stafford retired today, no.
But likely when it's all said and done, 60K+ yards, 400+ TDs and a ring should get him in after a couple ballots.
But likely when it's all said and done, 60K+ yards, 400+ TDs and a ring should get him in after a couple ballots.