You're exemplifying the zealous attitude that is inherent in the people who are brought up under the religion of science. That link you posted is full of incoherent claims such asSo you have no actual documentation to support your point. You are talking about graduation gowns like they prove your point. I gave you something to read so that you can learn what the differences are, but I am pretty sure you avoided it. You rather remain ignorant and argue from that ignorance instead of actually understanding the truth and working to defend your point with a counter valid source of information. See, arguing in ignorance is absolutely easy, takes no effort, and requires no real knowledge and understanding of what you are talking about, so many like you do it without a care.
So, if you want me to take you seriously. Bring out some actual article or something that proves your point. Throwing up a graduation picture only proves that you mistake a traditional uniform for education competition for some ritualistic act. It also shows that you have no clue of what a ritual actually is.
Universal truths are not "brought about".Science is based on universal truths brought about by observations and experiments.
This is exactly the kind of ritual that I referenced in my previous post. But that article and you don't understand that science is just another human enterprise built on such rituals. It points to a mistaken distinction between "science" versus "religion" as if science is not a form of religion, which it absolutely is.Rituals are performed for their symbolic value. They are in fact prescribed by religion or traditions of a community or society.
Another false claim. The ritual in science that I referenced is but one of many examples of rituals involving debates and discourse.Science involves debates and discourses whereas rituals do not involve debates and discourses.
There are many more such mistakes in the article but they all stem from the same fundamental flaw in zealous science stans: they lack an understanding of what "science" is and therefore lack self-knowledge as they don't understand their role in the religious system they defend.
Science is just a religion built around the narcissistic side of human nature that is out for control. Scientists only praise the virtues of debates and discourse until you trip up their ingrained beliefs about society that they have never questioned nor are willing to give up after they become aware of them.
It's because science is a religion that is used to sustain a socio-economic order in which inequality of citizens is the goal. It makes people less capable of critical thinking except in a very few limited areas of human endeavors. All around it is harmful to healthy human societies because it breeds narcissistic people as it needs those to support the social order it is embedded in.
to me.
said I’m the night captain now
