Rizza Islam on Racism in Psychology

Joined
Oct 22, 2017
Messages
34,229
Reputation
2,018
Daps
167,106
when he talked about how psychology was at the root of racialist theory, it reminded me of what franz fanon wrote about his study of psychology before he began practicing. he encountered difficulty finding literature that wasn’t tainted by a eurocentric - and, thus, anti-other (black) - perspective.

:francis:
 
Joined
Apr 3, 2014
Messages
71,910
Reputation
17,458
Daps
306,521
Man get this scamming nxgga outta here. :camby:


Homebody is on record for being a scammer, they got the proof on him. He can't give me no "knowledge" about nothing.

Dude is a joke.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: IVS

CopiousX

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Dec 15, 2019
Messages
15,538
Reputation
5,523
Daps
76,318
Hotep babble. Straw men and red herrings all over the place.


the whole video basically creates a straw man and attacks psychology in its infancy 100 yrs ago ; and assumes that describes psychology in 2024. There is no logical connection between those two things given how much every field of science has changed from its infancy in those eras. Note that he has infinite citations of stuff in 1800s or 1900s but absolutely nothing recent from the last 20 years. It would be the equivalent of me saying "dentisitst are barbaric, so you shouldnt trust one to clean your teeth or for a root canal in 2024", but all my examples to prove this point are from 1910 when dentists used pliers to pull teeth out and casually gave cocaine to patients.

He isnt qualified to have this discussion.

Idealy you would listen to someone who has actually gotten their MD in psychiatry or a professional degree in social work/behavioral psyche/clinical psyche , etc . It doesnt even have to be a white person , neither does it have to be a person working wthin the industry, just a learned one. For example, Dr. Amos Wilson laid the bedrock for modern Hoteps, but was himself a behavioral psychologist who could cite numerous current studies that were applicable to his points.
 
Last edited:

Nar-el

Pro
Joined
May 28, 2015
Messages
222
Reputation
53
Daps
1,075
Hotep babble. Straw men and red herrings all over the place.


the whole video basically creates a straw man and attacks psychology in its infancy 100 yrs ago ; and assumes that describes psychology in 2024. There is no logical connection between those two things given how much every field of science has changed from its infancy i those eras. Note that he has infinite citations of stuff in 1800s or 1900s but absolutely nothing recent from the last 20 years. It would be the equivalent of me saying "dentisitst are barbaric, so you shouldnt trust one to clean your teeth or for a root canal in 2024", but all my examples to prove this point are from 1910 when dentists used pliers to pull teeth out and casually gave cocaine to patients.

He isnt qualified to have this discussion.

Idealy you would listen to someone who has actually gotten their MD in psychiatry or a professional degree in social work/behavioral psyche/clinical psyche , etc . It doesnt even have to be a white person , neither does it have to be a person working wthin the industry, just a learned one. For example, Dr. Amos Wilson laid the bedrock for modern Hoteps, but was himself a behavioral psychologist who could cite numerous current studies that were applicable to his points.
Didn't watch the video but he isn't completely wrong. All the phony IQ science comes from the field of psychology called psychometrics, which is still going strong. There's also a newer branch called behavioral genetics that is kind of suspect.
 

Pull Up the Roots

Breakfast for dinner.
Joined
Sep 15, 2015
Messages
25,905
Reputation
13,311
Daps
111,914
Reppin
Detroit
You only lose by listening to people like that. He claims everything is a depopulation plot.
 
Last edited:

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
337,983
Reputation
-35,018
Daps
641,422
Reppin
The Deep State
Hotep babble. Straw men and red herrings all over the place.


the whole video basically creates a straw man and attacks psychology in its infancy 100 yrs ago ; and assumes that describes psychology in 2024. There is no logical connection between those two things given how much every field of science has changed from its infancy in those eras. Note that he has infinite citations of stuff in 1800s or 1900s but absolutely nothing recent from the last 20 years. It would be the equivalent of me saying "dentisitst are barbaric, so you shouldnt trust one to clean your teeth or for a root canal in 2024", but all my examples to prove this point are from 1910 when dentists used pliers to pull teeth out and casually gave cocaine to patients.

He isnt qualified to have this discussion.

Idealy you would listen to someone who has actually gotten their MD in psychiatry or a professional degree in social work/behavioral psyche/clinical psyche , etc . It doesnt even have to be a white person , neither does it have to be a person working wthin the industry, just a learned one. For example, Dr. Amos Wilson laid the bedrock for modern Hoteps, but was himself a behavioral psychologist who could cite numerous current studies that were applicable to his points.
Yep. Not to mention, Rizza is clean cut enough to fool people who themselves dont have credentials while ignoring Rizza has none.
 
Top