Robert Mugabe says no whites may own land in Zimbabwe
- Thread starter Scientific Playa
- Start date
godkiller
"We are the Fury"
The success of Mugabe's bureaucracy has no bearing on the question of whether cacs should be in fukking Africa. There may be a litany of successful or unsuccessful governments in Africa - that has NOTHING to do with whether cacs should be there. Similarly there is and will be a number of successful and unsuccessful governments in China, that has no bearing on whom China belongs and whether the Chinese indigenous should maintain rights over their land. Cacs
out of my people's land.
Last edited:
godkiller
"We are the Fury"
The Eastern Europeans hate blacks like roaches. Do you really think black people can go to places like Poland, Serbia and the Ukraine--places that regularly have incidents where blacks are brutally assaulted and politicians regularly make anti-black remarks--and purchase land? No. Russia? fukk no. Besides, that has no bearing on anything. If nikkas say cacs can't get nikka land, CACS CAN'T GET nikka LAND. Cacs can do whatever they want with their land. I don't give a fukk about Europe.
Last edited:
godkiller
"We are the Fury"
Exactly. The Europeans are unrepetent. Look how they already try to justify their existence in South Africa. They use similar arguments to the ones they use in America, "We've been here so long. Where should we go?". Back to the fukking Netherlands, scum.
The economy will improve in time. Korea and China were starving not even 40 years ago. Today they're first world societies. The economy and goes through phases; this is just another phase. I don't know why Zimbabwe's economic fortunes are being tied to white farmers. The white farmers are fukking invaders; their existence, whether it helps the paper economy propped up by cacs, should have ended regardless, like slavery should have ended, regardless of whether it basically maintained the Southern economy (which it did).
Enjoy your ban, cac. Whether black people abide by "human rights" is nikka business, not fukking cacs'. Cac countries do not even abide by human rights accords themselves; they have no right to judge anyone. And even if nikka never abided by human rights, why the fukk should that have any bearing on whether cacs should have a "white European Zimbabwe"? That should never happen even if a period of 100 dictators and 100 democracies should happen sequentially in Africa. Cacs are just searching for justifications to steal black people's land. I'm shocked.
Last edited:
godkiller
"We are the Fury"
The crash of the economy also coincided with cac European countries, including the fukking USA, imposing sanctions on Zimbabwe for kicking out cac colonizers, which was the right and moral thing to do. And exactly what South Africa should have done. Cac colonizers have no right to any land in Africa; their presence alone should have meant death since they knew what they were doing when they got there. And death is what Mugabe delivered. Cacs don't like when nikkas to cacs when cacs do to nikkas. Mugabe was imprisoned much like Mugabe but when he got out, rather than bend over and hand over his people to the same colonial cacs that would have went on to destroy, he set to work killing them. You wanna sanction and say that "b/c economy..white colonizers should remain". Nah, how bout black people worry about their own economy and cacs get the fukk out?
Last edited:
mbewane
Knicks: 93 til infinity
Tell us how you really feel breh
What did those vicious Eastern Europeans do to you when you tried to purchase land there?
godkiller
"We are the Fury"
Tell us how you really feel breh
They don't entertain black people in these nations. I no more have to ask the Polish about buying Polish land than I need ask any racist cac in America about doing the same. Blacks don't invest in those countries for a reason (unless you think the Eastern Europeans' racism has nothing to do with anything, which is perposterous). A foreigner can't even formally own a business in China without a Chinese counterpart. The same is more true in Saudi Arabia. I don't know why nikkas eschewing cac colonialists from indigenous property and livelihood gets you cacs all fired up, Belgian. I also don't know why I have to give "justification" for nikkas deciding to not sell to certain groups. Do you question the Saudis, Israelis, Chinese, for their restrictive citizenship and ownership laws? No.
Last edited:
mbewane
Knicks: 93 til infinity
And how do you know all of this, friend?
How did the discussion on Eastern European move on to China?
I'm a eurocac, how so?
godkiller
"We are the Fury"
And how do you know all of this, friend?
How did the discussion on Eastern European move on to China?
I'm not going into details about the common thread of racism throughout parts of Europe, and the facts black people own virtually nothing over there as proof. The notion is irrelevant anyway. The fact is that nikkas have a right to bar cacs from owning land; there is a good reason to bar cacs from owning land in Africa given cacs' colonial and anti-black ambitions; it is best that blacks own their own land and companies while business with others, much like China and other nations do. There need not be any more reasons than the 3 I just mentioned. It doesn't even matter if cacs started it, retaliate, etc.
As for the Chinese point, it's just to show that other nations and parts of the world employ similar restrictions with nations like Israel all but barring people from citizenship, ownership, etc unless a person is of a certain ethnicity or religion. The shyt works in Israel as it works elsewhere.
I'm a eurocac, how so?
I know you're a Belgian so your defence against blacks deciding against allowing whites to own land in black nations--which is good for blacks --is hollow and transparent. You just stanning for one or both of your parents. I don't give a fukk either way. Cacs can do business with nikkas like cacs do business with everyone else who applies similar laws and restrictions.
Last edited:
mbewane
Knicks: 93 til infinity
Where do you get all this data about "Blacks own virtually nothing over there"? Have you even ever been to Europe friend? Do you have any idea of how things work here, or do you skim through websites?
Where did you see that I have a "defence against blacks deciding allowing whites to own land in black nations"?
So Belgians are only "eurocacs", are we? Ad hominem attacks are quite hollow and transparent too, friend
TELL ME YA CHEESIN FAM?
I walk around a little edgy already
U want to be taken seriously
You're calling people c00ns...then type some bs like that?
Poppa_Dock
:gladlebron:
Most of the cacs dipped to neighboring countries and are now helping them prosper. Zimbabwe took a huge L. Entire place crumbled when the cracker man left.
Dzali OG
Dz Ali OG...Pay me like you owe me!
We're also missing that this entire system of economy, globally and domestically, is alien to a large number of Africans. We were never invited to that party as welcome guests either. Always as the people to be taken advantage of.
No other race has been ostracized from the world party, as have black people.
The black race is being criticized for not being too good at participating in this demons games.
No other race has been ostracized from the world party, as have black people.
The black race is being criticized for not being too good at participating in this demons games.
godkiller
"We are the Fury"
As far as I can tell, there is no record of black ownership or business in Poland, Serbia, Russia (and I looked)-- the pattern is the same. I don't have to be in Europe to know this trend, just like I don't have to be in Israel to know that Israel annexes land for Jewish people and only extends citizenship to Jewish people. That's based on by Unofficially they are far more invidious than my last sentence entails, as my Israeli friends tells me.
I can't think of why you're here stanning otherwise.
So Belgians are only "eurocacs", are we? Ad hominem attacks are quite hollow and transparent too, friend
Yes. The fact you're a cac is backed up by what you disagree with. The other cac who was arguing for cacs being able to buy up African land was banned.
godkiller
"We are the Fury"
Dip? You call "apartheid" dipping?
And yet, cac, the richest country in Africa has no cacs and its economy is run by and enriches blacks (meanwhile South Africa is a basket case). Japan has no cacs and its economy is run by and enriches the Japanese in the same way. The status quo already proves Blacks don't need cacs controlling shyt to "prosper", just like Asians don't need cacs controlling to prosper. Cacs try to tie prosperity to their controlling businesses and buying land so that blacks will allow them to control black people and economy. This is why the Europeans imposed sanctions when Mugabe deadded the farmer cacs; the Europeans (which includes Bush's GARBAGE government) want to make it so if nikkas decide not to bend to cacs, they'll economically suffer, just like Haiti did. Cacs don't try it with Asians because they know Asian countries will not change their shyt. As things go, it is best for blacks to control their own destiny and ban cacs. There are examples of growing black nations WITHOUT cacs.
Zimbabwe is growing too and in the long run it will be fine; even if it isn't, that's for them to figure out, not cacs. Saying there is justification for cacs in Africa b/c of economy is like saying there's justification for Spanairds in Native America b/c of "economy". The argument you make is eerily similar to the one Conquistadors (read: Spanaird rapists, murderers and colonizers) made about the Natives': "Our colonization is justified because the Natives are uncivilized; we will civilize them and bring them to modernity". So it seems the cac demon has not changed in 100 years, only the clothes the devil wears on his back.
Last edited: