feelosofer
#ninergang
This is so ridiculous it's not even funny. Just blantant racism.
i dont think that all 32 owners have a personal problem with his protest, although im sure most do. but thats not the real issueI agree. Legally, he's not being blackballed. Individually, owners don't want to sign him because of the anthem protests. It's easy to see 32 white owners not wanting sing Kaep![]()
its a fukkin shame
he has a better chance of getting elected than getting signedYeah breh, that's what I was trying to say really. That I don't think that owners are collectively agreeing to sign Kaepernick. But they don't want to risk pissing off their fan base for someone who's not a superstar.i dont think that all 32 owners have a personal problem with his protest, although im sure most do. but thats not the real issue
the fact is that signing colin kaepernick is a bad move because this country, their customer base, is full of racist whites who are going to boycott their product. and he simply isn't some incredible talent that's worth taking on that risk. this shyt is about money
i mean would anyone deny that it's a terrible decision to sign him from a purely business standpoint? i dont even think kaep is surprised he isnt getting offers. i supported his protest, i think this is blatant blackballing (not legally, more as an unwritten consensus), but the bottom line is...what did he expect? he might have exposed the country, but he sure as fukk didn't line up a job for himselfits a fukkin shame

Not sure why the NFL must blatantly lie about this.
Aint nobody trying to be forthcoming about dirt brehNot sure why the NFL must blatantly lie about this.

That's not what Mara told the press:NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell maintains the league has no role in Colin Kaepernick remaining an unsigned free agent heading into the 2017 season.
According to Luke Jones of WNST, Goodell said that each of the 32 teams has made a "football decision" to avoid signing the former San Francisco 49ers quarterback.
"He can't be [blackballed] because we're not," Goodell said, per Jones. "The clubs are making those individual evaluations."


i dont think that all 32 owners have a personal problem with his protest, although im sure most do. but thats not the real issue
the fact is that signing colin kaepernick is a bad move because this country, their customer base, is full of racist whites who are going to boycott their product. and he simply isn't some incredible talent that's worth taking on that risk. this shyt is about money
i mean would anyone deny that it's a terrible decision to sign him from a purely business standpoint? i dont even think kaep is surprised he isnt getting offers. i supported his protest, i think this is blatant blackballing (not legally, more as an unwritten consensus), but the bottom line is...what did he expect? he might have exposed the country, but he sure as fukk didn't line up a job for himselfits a fukkin shame
i hope he gets into politics, something that actually matters more than throwing around a piece of leather and running towards some paint. fukk the NFLhe has a better chance of getting elected than getting signed
Who was he supposed to vote for? He didn't trust any of the candidates and it's his choice. Isn't itThe "pigs" socks and not voting were missteps on his part that I think indicate he's not gonna be a politician. I'd much rather he be an activist and not be tied to the political system that he's railed against since last summer

Just this year?Gonna enjoy not watching this league this year.

Liability for a suit.Not sure why the NFL must blatantly lie about this.