rip928
Pro
So, you want ESPN to talk about your teams more? Or do you think ESPN is paying or swaying AP voters and coaches, for polls that don't even matter? Or both?
And if you fukkers lose one more game you deserve to be in?We have 3 top 10 teams left to play and a top 15 team.
If you want to say we haven't beat anyone yet, fine. We get a chance to show and prove.
Why are you bringing up Kentucky, Arky, Florida and Tamu? None of those teams are ranked and no one is getting credit for beating them today.
Is the SEC the best conference in america?
it is over for you if y'all lose.
Y'all deserve to be right around 1 loss Nebraska when you lose thursday
Depends...And if you fukkers lose one more game you deserve to be in?
Because they're pushing this narrative if we lose, it's over. If it was auburn in our position they'd be fighting for them to have an opportunity to defend their title with one loss. SECW squads have a partner fighting on their behalf to get them in regardless of W-L record. They'll even go to bat for a team that won't win its own division or conference to get in. No one is afforded that type of opportunity. Not even UGAExactly, BEAT the SEC schools in the Title games.
AndFSU fans gotta be upset for, they undefeated. Win all the games, and you're guaranteed a spot in the playoff.
Word?Depends...

Think its more to do with the article, a lot of football left to played, this initial ranking will be interesting to see what this committee is looking at though

That's what happens when 7 of the last 8 national champions have come from the SEC. The only reason some in the media like Rolling Stone are mad is because the SEC is a conference in the southern states of America. If any conference outside of the south were dominating college football like the SEC has consistently over the last 10-12 years then nothing would be said about it. They would much rather hype up schools out of Massachusetts, New York, etc. than Georgia or Alabama if they could.
How about that east coast bias in professional sports? 9 times out of 10 when a MLB game is on ESPN it's either the Yankees or the Red Sox playing. Or what about that LeBron and Kobe bias with the NBA? There are several teams each year who will not play a single one of their 82 games on ESPN or TNT, but Lebron and Kobe will be on one or the other every week.
Not to even mention that SEC teams draw more money with ticket sales and television ratings. It's not even close when comparing other conferences head to head as a whole. ESPN is going to take into consideration two things whenever deciding what to broadcast about each sport,
1. Who is the best
2. Who attracts the most attention / money
