Russia Warns America not to intervene in Syria Or they will be shot down.( UPDATE U.S. RESPONDS!

[Chrishaune]

There is a war coming......1/3 of the people on Earth are going to die because of it.....Guess where that war will be fought.....






Near the Euphrates River.........Where are we fighting now???





Near the Euprates River......





It's going to happen soon brehs....

 

[Chrishaune]

I'm always ready, brehs.

You sure about that???

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

Like I said, we know what you're about. You're a troll and pathetic. Piss off We don't take you seriously.

You don't know anything, Joe. It's why you only come with insults.

The aggressor isn't Russia. It's the U.S who is trying to destroy a legitimate govt instead of ISIS. Russia is saying go after ISIS but don't touch Assad, who is fighting ISIS. Russia drew the line when the U.S said it would attack govt forces, Russia does not want to have a Libya on it's borders. The blood thirsty one here is the U.S, not Russia. Russia is fed up with the U.S destroying countries with impunity like Libya, Iraq and Afghanistan. It can not tolerate having another one, especially so close to its border. If Assad is destroyed FOR SURE ISIS will take over Syria, no way the Russians can allow that. ISIS right next door arming Chechnyans, hell no.

No. Just look at the Russian airstrike maps to see that they're mostly ignoring ISIS. As are Assad's "forces". The rest of your post is laughable. I guess you're going to ignore Chechnya or Georgia or Ukraine for whatever reason. I guess what happened to Grozny didn't happen. It was probably spontaneous combustion.

The US:
killed 6,213 people across Syria, of which:
5,359 dead were ISIL fighters,
147 Al-Nusra Front militants and other rebels,
90 government soldiers and
617 civilians.

Russia:
killed 9,364 people, of which:
2,746 were ISIL fighters,
2,814 militants from the rebel forces opposed to Assad
3,804 civilians.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

You sure about that???

you don't need the biggest bomb.

 

[ChatGPT-5]

You don't know anything, Joe. It's why you only come with insults.


No. Just look at the Russian airstrike maps to see that they're mostly ignoring ISIS. As are Assad's "forces". The rest of your post is laughable. I guess you're going to ignore Chechnya or Georgia or Ukraine for whatever reason. I guess what happened to Grozny didn't happen. It was probably spontaneous combustion.

Rebel Forces and ISIS are one in the same. Both are rebels to the Govt. Both are threats to Syria, a legitimate govt.

Russia's objective is to restore order and remove rebels from Syria. U.S objective is to remove Assad and ISIS. However removing Assad would just install ISIS the same way Libya is full of rebels like Al Qaeda now.

 

[eufemism]

Assuming Nukes aren't used how does Modern Warfare even work. Do we try to Invade Russian and them vice versa

An invasion of either the US or Russia would be a bloodbath. Both are large land masses with lots of distance between major cities unlike Central Europe in WW2. Russia has some of the worst conditions in the world. The US is surrounded by oceans on two sides and allies on the two other sides. Not to mention the largest navy in the world and probably largest air force slightly above the UK to protect its coasts.



Tom Clancy actually wrote a novel called Red Storm Rising that is pretty much mirroring exactly what's happening right now. Russia gets desperate when it's economy is on the verge of collapsing. The Russian government hires terrorists to attack their own oil rig so they can declare war and invade oil fields across Europe.


It's a great read if you want to see what a non nuclear WW3 would look like

 

[Bawon Samedi]

If I was in the USA shoes I would just give Russia what they want and just let Russia bleed themselves dry like they did with Afghanistan. Just giving weapons to anti Assad forces to make the civil war drag on. Making it pricer for a Russia that is already in a recession. The USA didn't need to intervene in Afghanistan they don't with this. And its looking that way...

In a nuclear war both loses but in a non one USA on paper is obviously far ahead of Russia.

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

Rebel Forces and ISIS are one in the same. Both are rebels to the Govt.

Nah. The rebel forces and Assad beef (if we can call it that) stems from the civil war. He's indifferent towards ISIS. Assad does business with ISIS too.

 

[Chrishaune]

you don't need the biggest bomb.

Just showing brehs what they'll get a taste of.......It doesn't have to be that big......We can stop some of them with missile defense, but can we stop all of them?....probably not, nobody knows the answer to that(I used to work missile defense).......One average nuclear weapon will take out at least a 1 miles radius on impact plus you're talking up to at least 10 mile radius from blast and radiation effects.....There's thousands out there....Once they start firing, there is no stopping at that point until the mission is accomplished or one side gives up......They will target strategic areas.....military bases, and some large cities.

They don't care about the average man....we're on our own, when it comes to that. It's about saving the one's that can benefit them at that point. Government.....military officials......that's about it. Anybody else that survives will be fortunate enough not to live near a targeted area....

 

[ChatGPT-5]

Nah. The rebel forces and Assad beef (if we can call it that) stems from the civil war. He's indifferent towards ISIS. Assad does business with ISIS too.

link
http://www.newsweek.com/assad-turns-isis-last-ditch-bid-legitimacy-470636

and I know about the civil war. What I am saying is, they are both his target. Both are 'rebels' by definition.

 

[Chrishaune]

If I was in the USA shoes I would just give Russia what they want and just let Russia bleed themselves dry like they did with Afghanistan. Just giving weapons to anti Assad forces to make the civil war drag on. Making it pricer for a Russia that is already in a recession. The USA didn't need to intervene in Afghanistan they don't with this. And its looking that way...

In a nuclear war both loses but in a non one USA on paper is obviously far ahead of Russia.

The United States is protecting some of these other countries, that's why they're spending so much to develop weapons. It's not all for the U.S.......It's Israel, Japan, South Korea, some other Middle Eastern countries, etc....They are getting the benefit of it too...

 

[eufemism]

See you nikkas In the vaults

Dude fukk the vaults



Most of them were designed to be horrible scientific and social experiments



You may as well take your chances with the nuclear blast

 

[Ciggavelli]

As somebody that worked with the Military (I still am too), the US will win any "traditional" war. It's not even up for depate. We'll murder your own family and city. And it will be nothing.

The US reigns supreme in traditional warfare. That's just a fact.

Non-traditional warfare,not so much.

But if it's US v Russia, the US is winning. No if ands or buts. We own that shyt.

Wanna compare nukes? Nah
Wanna compare standing army in the area? Nah

The terrorists had it right with asymmetric warfare. We can't compete for whatever reason. But, the US v Russia? No competition. We're winning that shyt.

 

[Chrishaune]

As somebody that worked with the Military (I still am too), the US will win any "traditional" war. It's not even up for depate. We'll murder your own family and city. And it will be nothing.

The US reigns supreme in traditional warfare. That's just a fact.

Non-traditional warfare,not so much.

But if it's US v Russia, the US is winning. No if ands or buts. We own that shyt.

Wanna compare nukes? Nah
Wanna compare standing army in the area? Nah

The terrorists had it right with asymmetric warfare. We can't compete for whatever reason. But, the US v Russia? No competition. We're winning that shyt.

Win, no doubt, but at what cost???How many people will die in the process?

Life won't be like it is today after a nuclear war......A lot of tightening of regulations and a lot more security. Travel won't be as free as it is today. They will monitor everything to try and prevent it from happening again.......It won't be better. It will be worse than it is today.


Is that the world we want to live in??? Nah

 

[mortuus est]

The US reigns supreme in traditional warfare. That's just a fact.

someone explain why in detail plz