Schefters saying that Brady's suspension will be completely overturned

Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
28,042
Reputation
4,853
Daps
104,446
Obviously you know that Brady didn't know about the football tampering so I'm asking you.

Anyone with two functioning eyes and a brain can tell Brady had some knowledge about what was going on.

Boston has slipped into a coc00n this week.

You have reading comprehension issues...I explicitly said I didn't know if Brady did it.

Even if I did KNOW that Brady had nothing to do with it, that doesn't mean I can say what McNally meant in a text. Nor does it mean Brady can answer that. Your inability to formulate basic logic is hilarious.
 

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Superstar
Joined
Aug 14, 2012
Messages
6,522
Reputation
135
Daps
15,869
You have reading comprehension issues...I explicitly said I didn't know if Brady did it.

Even if I did KNOW that Brady had nothing to do with it, that doesn't mean I can say what McNally meant in a text. Nor does it mean Brady can answer that. Your inability to formulate basic logic is hilarious.

Bdkane asked you "Do you think Brady had no idea about those footballs?"

You said "Yup."

You then responded with some other statement that vaguely contradicted your certainty but I was simply trying to get you to explain, in your defense, why do you think Brady DID NOT know about the footballs being doctored?

And if you are not sure if Brady knew or not why did you respond with "yup"?

Lying ppl in denial never stay consistent.
 
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
28,042
Reputation
4,853
Daps
104,446
Bdkane asked you "Do you think Brady had no idea about those footballs?"

You said "Yup."

You then responded with some other statement that vaguely contradicted your certainty but I was simply trying to get you to explain, in your defense, why do you think Brady DID NOT know about the footballs being doctored?

And if you are not sure if Brady knew or not why did you respond with "yup"?

Lying ppl in denial never stay consistent.

"Think" does NOT mean "KNOW"

Your piss poor reading comprehension skills are embarrassing :snoop:

Especially since I explicitly stated this difference in that very post. I also explained, in another response to you, that even if I did know for sure Brady wasn't involved, that doesn't mean I can explain McNally's text.

The fact that this simple exchange over a messageboard has confused you so (when that wasn't even the intent) should tell you that jumping to conclusions based on clearly biased report isn't a good idea cuz you're clearly quite impressionable when you want the result to be one way.
 
Top