Schefters saying that Brady's suspension will be completely overturned

[duncanthetall]

Yeah...Schefter didn't say that shyt

 

[Jerz-2]

Breh, it's not about knowing more than Munson.

This is administrative law, plain and simple.

The arbitrator will be reviewing the league's punishment in the appeal (under the arbitrary and capricious standard). And if there's another appeal, the federal court will be reviewing the arbitrator's decision (under the reasonableness standard). The judicial review will not be on the merits (i.e., what Brady did or didn't do) but will be on how the league and/or the arbitrator reviewed the evidence before them and made a decision. Thus, Brady will not be required to give up his phone and its contents before an arbitrator or even before a federal judge if it gets to that point. This isn't a criminal case. The league cannot attempt to prove Brady's guilt again. How are you not understanding this?

You know nothing about the law.

Dawg, I'm a litigator and I been on SOHH/The Coli since 2006....I BEEN learned that you don't talk law with these dudes, yo.

 

[Bernie Madoff]

Dawg, I'm a litigator and I been on SOHH/The Coli since 2006....I BEEN learned that you don't talk law with these dudes, yo.

Bbbut on first 48 the cops say its always better to make statements. If your not guilty what do you have to hide?

Only people with nothing to hide are the coli posters and gdep

 

[AITheAnswerAI]

I expect him to appeal and it get reduced to 2 games.

 

[Brady-Carter]

Bbbut on first 48 the cops say its always better to make statements. If your not guilty what do you have to hide?

Only people with nothing to hide are the coli posters and gdep

 

[William F. Russell]

I expect him to appeal and it get reduced to 2 games.

It's very likely the suspension is overturned altogether.

 

[Lakers Offseason]

It's very likely the suspension is overturned altogether.

No fukking way breh.

As goofy as that Wells report is, the rebuttal is almost as goofy. The only way that could happen is if the arbitrator is Tagliabue (who overturned the Vilma case and seems on intent to make Goodell look like a dumbass) and that's a big "if".

 

[Brady-Carter]

No fukking way breh.

As goofy as that Wells report is, the rebuttal is almost as goofy. The only way that could happen is if the arbitrator is Tagliabue (who overturned the Vilma case and seems on intent to make Goodell look like a dumbass) and that's a big "if".

The last 2 people to fight Goodell both got their suspensions overturned. Ray Rice and AD. So the NFLPA is on a bit of a streak. Hardy is next in que so it will be interesting to see how that goes.

 

[protestor]

The pats rebbutal

They tried but failed miserably at explaing the texts. Dhalsim level reaches.

I will say the science is debatable. Some scientist say its natural others don't.

Godell will bring it down 2 games. Nobody is happy. Done.

 

[William F. Russell]

People in this thread STILL don't understand what this arbitration process will be about and how it'll be decided.

 

[bdkane]

It's very likely the suspension is overturned altogether.

Let me ask you sumpin breh. Real talk without legal mumbo jumbo. Do you think Brady had no idea about those footballs? Because if you do why are you defending this shyt? We can argue punishment. If I were a wine expert and told you I could not tell the diff between a 57 chardonnay and a 73 merlot wold you believe that shyt? If you do you are a fukkin idiot.

 

[William F. Russell]

Let me ask you sumpin breh. Real talk without legal mumbo jumbo. Do you think Brady had no idea about those footballs? Because if you do why are you defending this shyt? We can argue punishment. If I were a wine expert and told you I could not tell the diff between a 57 chardonnay and a 73 merlot wold you believe that shyt? If you do you are a fukkin idiot.

What I think doesn't matter. The legal process does though. And I'm familiar with that.

And your analogy is shyt.

 

[protestor]

What I think doesn't matter. The legal process does though. And I'm familiar with that.

And your analogy is shyt.

Answer the dam question, for fuks sake lol

 

[bdkane]

What I think doesn't matter. The legal process does though. And I'm familiar with that.

And your analogy is shyt.

So O.J. is not guilty and neither is Zimmerman? And all those lynched in the past were justified because the "legal" process said so?

 

[¯\_(ツ)_/¯]

Answer the dam question, for fuks sake lol

Usually a non-direct answer is an answer. He knows Brady knew.