SEC's myth trumps its reality, Stoops says

BigSteve

All Star
Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
2,994
Reputation
562
Daps
5,728
Maybe it started off as myth, and if so, it's great marketing by SEC schools individually and by the conference as a whole.

The TALENT in the SEC is superior though. It's been that way for years now, solidified by the Draft nearly every year.
http://www.cbssports.com/collegefoo...aft-by-conference-sec-doubles-the-competition

Stoops can theorize all he wants, but NFL scouts will tell you that the SEC does have superior talent. It's not even close.
 

jadillac

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
58,505
Reputation
9,907
Daps
180,307
damnit Bob!!! Again? :snoop:

You can't keep ur mouth shut long enough for us to (hopefully) keep flying under the radar and sneak up on people towards the end of the year?

:snoop:
 

BigSteve

All Star
Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
2,994
Reputation
562
Daps
5,728
The real story here is what has happened with the SEC during the BCS era.

In 2004 Auburn got the shaft and Oklahoma got beat down by USC (a USC team that would have drummed everyone that year). However, Auburn fans, and SEC fans in general, started a campaign that the SEC is the step child of the national sporting media. There was a movement among most SEC schools that the national media WILL respect the SEC and their teams.

The backlash culminated in what we have today. The SEC as a whole is wildly dominant in every aspect of the game (recruiting, bowls, records, players in the NFL, coaching, championships). I'm not arguing variables of those stats/numbers because that's neither here nor there. The fact is that those numbers support the SEC.

The backlash started by the SEC against the national media and the "other" fans of CFB in general vaulted the SEC to where it is today. The fans of the schools supported their team first, but the conference second. It created an environment where SEC schools have fans of the school, and proponents of the conference. That's why it's not like that anywhere else in D-1 football.

Now there is a counter-backlash of sorts where the rest of the nation is getting sick and tired of hearing about the SEC. Saban, Miles, Richt, Spurrier, the up-and-comer coaches, their staffs, and the largely successful ADs/presidents of the SEC schools won't be around forever. They will trip, and the SEC dominance will end. Whenever that happens, you'll have your NDs, Michigans, OSUs, FSUs, USCs, Oklahomas winning again. All will return to what it was before the SEC dominance. The talent will spread out again.

I think of it this way...

The entire southeast started chanting SEC back in 2004 when Auburn had to sit at home. The chant grew louder and louder each year since. With every win over another opponent (especially the Big Ten, SEC fans HATE the Big Ten)(and Notre Dame) the chant grew louder.

2006: Florida over Ohio State (SEC fans LOVED beating on of the Big Ten's flagship teams)

2007: LSU did it to OSU again, take that Big Ten

2008: Florida's defense quashed Stoops proud offense. This is the reason that Stoops is so upset. I think that he believes if they could play again that his great offense would actually hang with or defeat that same Florida team.

2009: Alabama defeats the other BigXII flagship, the Texas Longhorns.

2010: This is the SEC nearing the peak of their dominance. Auburn, who had to sit at home half a decade earlier, utilizes a ridiculous loophole to pretty much buy the best player in the land to lead them to a championship. Did a lot of people turn a blind eye? Yes. Does the NCAA want to absolutely NAIL Auburn/Cam? Yes. However, Auburn got their championship that they felt they outright earned in 2004. They did it over a new and exciting Oregon team, albeit by way of rolling-tackle-no-tackle on Dyer.

2011: The apex of the SEC reign, in my opinion. If Auburn's championship didn't feed the SEC hunger a year earlier, LSU-Bama definitely would. This was a HUGE turning point for the SEC timeline that I'm speaking on. Before 2011, there were still PLENTY (there still are a few) of SEC fans that thought the national media was still biased against the conference. They were still so upset about the general negative opinion on the conference by ESPN and other media outlets years and years before.
2011 was the first year that it was blatantly obvious to any neutral third party fan that there truly was an SEC bias. "They don't respect us as a conference!" by pro-SEC common fans was suddenly turned into "Respect us, we're the SEC!" by conference blowhards.
The "S-E-C! S-E-C! S-E-C!" chant used to be a common ground that most fans of the conference could meet on to express their support for a conference that didn't get the national media blowjobs that other conferences got.
In 2011 it turned into chant that conference fans used to rub their dominance in everyone's face. People got sick of it.
The rest of the nation went from saying "The SEC is impressive and fierce" to saying "The SEC is annoying as fukk."

2012 Bama dominated Notre Dame, the fans got to chant "S-E-C" but it wasn't as important or symbolic.

Now everyone just wants the SEC to shut up and get over it already. And a lot of fans of SEC teams have forgotten what the "S-E-C" movement was about in the first place. It was about earning respect and demonstrating the dominance that most SEC fans felt that their team could bring forth. It was also about proving that the SEC had the most loyal and hardcore fans. Now it's turned into everyone rubbing the SEC dominance in other fans' faces and saying "We're the best! Wah!"
 

Illin Degenerate

All Star
Joined
Jun 14, 2012
Messages
2,419
Reputation
425
Daps
4,016
Reppin
NULL
hes trying to twist the defenses falling back this year as evidence that the sec has never been that good. which is a crock that you can file right along with all the other conspiracy theories and or excuses for the sec being the best conference the past 7 years, and no thats not just based on the national champion.

the pac 12 just might challenge the sec this year. its going to come down to washington, ucla, and maybe 1 or 2 others proving theyre top 25 caliber teams. theyre getting the resources, the coaches, and the athletes to be a very good conference. sucks for them that southern cal went in the toilet.
 

BigSteve

All Star
Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
2,994
Reputation
562
Daps
5,728
I think a lot of this is calculated on Stoops' part as well. He's trying to sneak Oklahoma into the SEC conversation as well so that Oklahoma gets the same amount of coverage that SEC schools do in the media. I know there's a lot of potential for him to fall flat on his face, but at least he's throwing the Oklahoma hat in the mix saying that they're not scared of the SEC. What's the best way to be associated with the best conference in football? Say that you're better than them and see if you can fool recruits into believing it.
 

#StarkSet

Stark till I die
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
20,187
Reputation
4,929
Daps
40,882
He needs to shut the fukk up before people realize he sux and is overrated. A&M still got a piece of cleat in that azz. And that's like the 2nd or 3rd best team in the SEC. Maybe 4.

Breh i know this dude not comparing the big12 to the gawds in the SEC :aicmon:


And i go to a big 12 school :heh:

you can put most of them SEC teams in the NFC South

SEC SEC


cant wait till tcu humbles stoops this year




:dead:
 
Top