Septum Ring Twitter's latest target: Elle Varner

[Gravity]

you guys don't understand what it's like to be a young girl having the heavy responsibility of mens sexual interest being shoved on you. You see how women are thought of in a sexual way nowadays? It's not kind. At all. And all you're doing is being a kid. And they're basically saying, you have a lustful body and if something happens to you, you provoked it. You attracted that attention. Someone with an interest towards an underdeveloped human being is healthy and normal and the only thing you have to do to prevent it is wear your skirts a little bit longer.

You're clouding the issue with a bunch of bullshyt that has nothing to do with point. The point here is that girls in school shouldn't dress inappropriately. All that shyt about people shaming women and victim blaming women who have been victims of sexualized assaults is a straw man that feminists have made up to deflect. Revealing provocative attire isn't appropriate for school, period. It's not any more complicated than that.

 

[( ິΦᆺΦ)ິ°˚(✿ *҉ manko｡✧)]

You're clouding the issue with a bunch of bullshyt that has nothing to do with point. The point here is that girls in school shouldn't dress inappropriately. All that shyt about people shaming women and victim blaming women who have been victims of sexualized assaults is a straw man that feminists have made up to deflect. Revealing provocative attire isn't appropriate for school, period. It's not any more complicated than that.

I'm not about to explain the value of innocent to your hardhead ass, you don't listen to anyone anyway
also, go thru my posts and find where I said girls should wear provocative clothing. If you can't find it, be a man and take your L, you be making arguments up in your head

 

[Gravity]

I'm not about to explain the value of innocent to your hardhead ass, you don't listen to anyone anyway
also, go thru my posts and find where I said girls should wear provocative clothing. If you can't find it, be a man and take your L, you be making arguments up in your head

I listen very well and have absolutely no problem conceding or admitting when I'm wrong. This ad hominem shyt is you trying to deflect again.

I didn't ask you explain anything. I understood what you said clearly. The value of innocence doesn't have a gotdamn thing to do with this. This is about Elle Varner's response to some looney feminist whining about girls being sent home from school for dressing inappropriately. All that bullshyt about innocence is a deflection.

I didn't accuse you of saying that girls should wear provocative clothing. I called you out for trying to cloud the issue with that "y'all just don't understand what it's like for a young girl being responsible for male sexual interest....." bullshyt. None of that is relevant to this discussion so save it. If girls are dressed inappropriately for school then they should be sent home.

 

[Hiphoplives4eva]

Elle Varner is fukking beautiful by the way! Wow!

 

[( ິΦᆺΦ)ິ°˚(✿ *҉ manko｡✧)]

I listen very well and have absolutely no problem conceding or admitting when I'm wrong. This ad hominem shyt is you trying to deflect again.

I didn't ask you explain anything. I understood what you said clearly. The value of innocence doesn't have a gotdamn thing to do with this. This is about Elle Varner's response to some looney feminist whining about girls being sent home from school for dressing inappropriately. All that bullshyt about innocence is a deflection.

I didn't accuse you of saying that girls should wear provocative clothing. I called you out for trying to cloud the issue with that "y'all just don't understand what it's like for a young girl being responsible for male sexual interest....." bullshyt. None of that is relevant to this discussion so save it. If girls are dressed inappropriately for school then they should be sent home.

wheeeeeeeeeeeere did I sayyyyyy that girls should wear provacative clothes? fukk whatever dumbass strawman twitter argument you're trying to push on me. If it's against the rules, they should change their clothes but if it's not and an individual finds it inappropriate because of their own sexuality, not only do they not have the right to say anything to the kid, they also would be morally wrong for approaching the child with their issue. If a 14 year old wears a tank top where tank tops are allowed and it bothers you, you have no right to say anything about their body or their clothes. You don't have the right to force your sexuality on kids.

 

[cocainebiceps]

Our school ended up with strict dress code after boys were taking upshots of girls and uploading it to the web. We don't live in vacuum where kids aren't influenced by exploitation or being exploited. It can get worse for girls, even though it shouldn't. I don't understand their end game.

 

[Gravity]

wheeeeeeeeeeeere did I sayyyyyy that girls should wear provacative clothes? fukk whatever dumbass strawman twitter argument you're trying to push on me. If it's against the rules, they should change their clothes but if it's not and an individual finds it inappropriate because of their own sexuality, not only do they not have the right to say anything to the kid, they also would be morally wrong for approaching the child with their issue. If a 14 year old wears a tank top where tank tops are allowed and it bothers you, you have no right to say anything about their body or their clothes. You don't have the right to force your sexuality of kids.

Obviously this whole story is about girls being sent home from school for wearing shyt that was already deemed inappropriate(short shorts, revealing tops) or against the school dress code. Otherwise they wouldn't have been sent home. That's a damn lawsuit. The fukk are you talking about?

 

[( ິΦᆺΦ)ິ°˚(✿ *҉ manko｡✧)]

Obviously this whole story is about girls being sent home from school for wearing shyt that was already deemed inappropriate(short shorts, revealing tops) or against the school dress code. Otherwise they wouldn't have been sent home. That's a damn lawsuit. The fukk are you talking about?

If you paid attention to what my point was instead of drawing your own wrong conclusions for the sake of arguing, my problem is with the sexually mature (adults) watching and evaluating underage kids and judging them as if they were sexually mature. If you disagree then we can talk about that but I'm not about to argue with you over something I didn't say. Let me know if you need me to explain it again.

 

[CoochieMane]

 

[Gravity]

If you paid attention to what my point was instead of drawing your own wrong conclusions for the sake of arguing, my problem is with the sexually mature (adults) watching and evaluating underage kids and judging them as if they were sexually mature. If you disagree then we can talk about that but I'm not about to argue with you over something I didn't say. Let me know if you need me to explain it again.

This brings me back to my original comment, you're trying to cloud the issue here. What does adults judging underage kids as if they're sexually mature have to do with this? This is about Elle Varner's response to someone complaining about girls being asked to change their clothes or being sent home for apparently violating the dress code.

By the way, some of the kids in high school are "sexually mature". They're not mentally or emotionally mature which is what separates them from adults. The line between bein underage and of age has nothing to do with sexual maturity, because you're sexually mature after you finish puberty. These school officials have a responsibility to make sure that students aren't dressing sexually while in a school environment.

 

[Maddmike]

This brings me back to my original comment, you're trying to cloud the issue here. What does adults judging underage kids as if they're sexually mature have to do with this? This is about Elle Varner's response to someone complaining about girls being asked to change their clothes or being sent home for apparently violating the dress code.

By the way, some of the kids in high school are "sexually mature". They're not mentally or emotionally mature which is what separates them from adults. The line between bein underage and of age has nothing to do with sexual maturity, because you're sexually mature after you finish puberty. These school officials have a responsibility to make sure that students aren't dressing sexually while in a school environment.

Let it go breh. I think y'all are having a argument about 2 different things

 

[ThatTruth777]

what she say?

 

[( ິΦᆺΦ)ິ°˚(✿ *҉ manko｡✧)]

This brings me back to my original comment, you're trying to cloud the issue here. What does adults judging underage kids as if they're sexually mature have to do with this? This is about Elle Varner's response to someone complaining about girls being asked to change their clothes or being sent home for apparently violating the dress code.

By the way, some of the kids in high school are "sexually mature". They're not mentally or emotionally mature which is what separates them from adults. The line between bein underage and of age has nothing to do with sexual maturity, because you're sexually mature after you finish puberty. These school officials have a responsibility to make sure that students aren't dressing sexually while in a school environment.

dude
you are not listening
It's not school rules or uniforms I was even talking about, like clearly I am not the feminist harlot you are looking to argue with
and puberty doesn't matter, the legal age you become an adult does

 

[Gravity]

dude
you are not listening
It's not school rules or uniforms I was even talking about, like clearly I am not the feminist harlot you are looking to argue with
and puberty doesn't matter, the legal age you become an adult does

Are you slow?

 

[( ິΦᆺΦ)ິ°˚(✿ *҉ manko｡✧)]

Are you slow?