i have. cycle for 3 weeks. and i felt like superman. but i wasnt benching 390. you are literally ignoring the work and genetics, and that lets me know YOU have no idea what youre talking about.
if you are the size of the rock, and the size of chris rock, and you both take anabolics, you will not have the same results, because the rock is clearly more gifted in the genetics department, and clearly puts more emphasis on his fitness training. and thats just facts. will chris rock get swole? yes, but will he get more swole than the rock who is taking the same trt...fukk no. he already had the advantage to begin with.
Bro, a cycle for 3 weeks is nothing, hell Enanthate kicks in the week or two after, so not sure what you were running but 3 weeks sounds like you aborted it, which is pretty dangerous if you didn't go about that the right way, which i suspect is the case, if you are telling the truth. And no, I definitely know what I'm talking about.
Although I don't enjoy public AAS discussion.
The work is largely irrelevant, I doubt you took anything, especially with 3 weeks, if you think work matters. I just mentioned this study:
Here's where things get interesting.
Men treated with testosterone who did not work out (T+NoE) gained nearly double the muscle mass as did those who received placebo injections but regularly exercised (NoT+E; 3.2 kg vs 1.9 kg increase).
Of course, the increase in
muscle mass among the men in the testosterone-plus-exercise group dwarfed both these groups, averaging 6.1 kg.
The use of anabolic steroids has been observed in essentially all levels of sport – from the high-school football team to professional sports. In professional body building, steroid use is as much part of the sport as is the training, tanning, and body waxing. Rumors also swirl around male...
medicalxpress.com
They gained nearly double the mass
sitting on the couch. So the "work" argument is negated, 100%. End of story, you don't know what you are talking about. People like you are just further adding to the delusion of the average person towards sport and bodybuilding. Yes, of course genetics plays a part, I used to be into competitive bodybuilding so of course I acknowledge that. My point is, you are greatly underestimating the impact of anabolics. That study above is always referenced when you fools try to bring up "hard work", they gain more mass the those working at the gym natural*.
So the "hard work" is dispelled, unless you have a study that suggests otherwise, which i doubt. On genetics, I never said genetics didn't play a part, you can't quote me saying that.
They unironically think fitness celebs are clean. 
Just kill me.
