Save NFL Flims, a major city with with no affiliation with the top grossing sports league worldwide...
That's a bad look.
Stop it.
First of all, the dude I was replying to was talking about the size of the city skyline. Can you read?![]()
Secondly, some of you guys are about to be in for a rude awakening over the next several years. Lakers have traditionally drafted very well.
You guys are just making excuses.
Yes, I know why the Raiders/Rams left......but the question is, what major player, in terms of cities, doesn't have an NFL team?![]()
So there's millions of ppl in LA, OF COURSE they're gonna gravitate to the Lakers, IF they are winning. Of course they're gonna gravitate to USC IF they're winning. Even tho the team was a playoff team, LA ppl weren't as supportive during the Van Exel/Jones/Ceballos era. People in LA weren't rockin with USC like that before Carroll got there in the early 00's. If they had a successful NFL team, they'd be jocking it.
And don't start a state-wide argument b/c the 49ers, have nothing to do with LA. Also, you'e ignoring the fact that Houston LOST an NFL team, just like LA did, and still got another before LA. There's politics involved on both side there.
Point is, there's no such thing as a "little town/small market" anymore. This isn't 1995. Even Durant/Westbrook are national stars & two of teh biggest in the NBA, playing on national TV more than "big market teams", despite playing in a smaller city like OKC. The whole NY/LA pressure thing is overblown/dead and most younger ppl don't even acknowledge it.
Can YOU read?
Read what I wrote and respond to that or else STFU
Stopped reading right there. They've also "traditionally" won championships. Sooooooooooo yea![]()
Breh Houston will NEVER be as significant as a basketball town as LA. Never. An it all has to do with the history of the franchise. When you win as much as the Lakers consistently throughout different decades, your prestige as a basketball city grows. LA will always be the Niger basketball market and more significant basketball city. It's not even close. The culture of great basketball cities like Boston and LA actually rub off on the players IMO. It's no coincidence Boston and LA have more hall-of-famers than any other cities. Its a culture in a sense.
And this is how I know I've won the argument.
I addressed the stuff you said within what I wrote.
Little town huh? LA aint even got an NFL team.
Shaq is a dummy. Houston is widely regarded as a big market.
Houston has more than one downtown area.
Naah 5th
La
Ny
Chi
Tdot
Hou
Why don't you explain this big picture to us simpletons genius. Please show me how Houston, the fourth largest city in the fukking US is an irrelevant small town.
I'll wait.
When talking about the top NBA cities, Houston is a "little town"
Miami is the 44th largest city in the country.
Houston is the 4th largest. Phoenix is the 6th largest. San Antonio is the 7th largest.
Those three cities are 10x the size of Miami. Now how many young players do you think would chose those three locations over the Heat![]()
when he said it was a little town he wasn't referring to population or geographical size, he was referring to relevance in the sports landscape.
No one else caught this? This guy's talking about sales tax ??Overated as f*ck
Lets see, he make 22 Million a year...
California state tax is 7.5% ...
7.5% of 22 million = $1,650,000
Factor in half the games are AWAY (at places that DO have state tax), you divide that 1.6 mil in half...
Total savings VS Cali: $825,000
He'd make that chump change up in Merchandise / Endorsements in LA 10x Over![]()
you really gotta spell shyt out for these cats in here.. 3 pages worth of idiots copying/pasting population numbers![]()