Mantis Toboggan M.D.
I’m here for the scraps
Not much else to say than this. Was Kobe better than Vince or McGrady? Yes. Could Shaq have led the lakers to those 3 titles with either of them in place of Kobe? Also yes.
Last edited:
Shaq doubles down on winning without Kobe:” I coulda won 3 in a row with Vince “.
- Thread starter BigTyme Records
- Start date
Oh I didn’t realize the Lakers won every title from 99-04.1999-2004 playoffs
Kobe 26 pts 5.4 rebs 5.1 assists
Shaq 27.5 pts 14.2 rebs 3 assists
The question isn't if they could score 22 but if they could perform under playoff pressure. Looki at Vince Carter/TMac's career and the answer is a NO.
I thought this was about Shaq 3 peating.
My bad.
He was only in his third season at 23 years old when he and Penny got to the Finals. They only played together for three total seasons then Shaq left for LA.He only won 1 with Wade and nothing with Penny tho
He joined Wade when he was on the decline at 31-32.
All he’s saying is that he would win with another hall of fame all-nba player, best coach ever and a very deep squad. That’s not the flex he thinks it is.
what you gonna do when Vince plays half the season, comes back from long injury and playing soft defense and on.
Shaq is not an analysts, he’s an unrealistic scenario shyt talker
what you gonna do when Vince plays half the season, comes back from long injury and playing soft defense and on.
Shaq is not an analysts, he’s an unrealistic scenario shyt talker
Mantis Toboggan M.D.
I’m here for the scraps
He was 33 by the end of his first season in Miami. Centers tend to fall off a cliff after that age. Kareem is basically the only exception.
Bruh if the coli is gonna tell me nobody else in the NBA could have put up 22/6/5 alongside Shaq …
FINALS STATS
THEY DONT EVEN MAKE
IT OUT THE WEST WITHOUT
KOBE IDIOTS
So he wonnwithiut KobeHe only won 1 with Wade and nothing with Penny tho
Thank you for making his point for him
You are generally a trash analog ass nikka in all your posts but you on point here, Clipper Darrell
Last edited:
Flat tops running the old “the actual finals don't matter” narrative
FINALS STATS
THEY DONT EVEN MAKE
IT OUT THE WEST WITHOUT
KOBE IDIOTS
Everyone knows Shaq would've won those chips with Tmac instead of Kobe everyone knew this
Not sure about Vince.
Shaq was DOMINATING though so its definitely a discussion if would've won with Vince
Back then T mac was bussin everyone's ass including Kobe's he would've definitely won 3 in a row with him
Not sure about Vince.
Shaq was DOMINATING though so its definitely a discussion if would've won with Vince
Back then T mac was bussin everyone's ass including Kobe's he would've definitely won 3 in a row with him
Everythingg
King-Over-Kingz
Oh I didn’t realize the Lakers won every title from 99-04.
I thought this was about Shaq 3 peating.
My bad.
Oh have it your way Josue
2000-2002 playoff stats
Kobe 25.2 pts 5.5 rebs 5.5 assists
Shaq 30 pts 14 rebs 3 assists
The question isn’t if TMac/VC could score 25 pts but if they could consistently do it under playoff pressure. Look at their careers and the answer is a NO.
Last edited:
Didn’t Pippen say he still would’ve won 6 if he played with Nique and not Jordan?
Would Jordan have won 6 if you had a Time Machine and replaced Pippen with Grant Hill?
Do the Spurs still win if they actually got Jason Kidd?
I guess we’ll never know…
Would Jordan have won 6 if you had a Time Machine and replaced Pippen with Grant Hill?
Do the Spurs still win if they actually got Jason Kidd?
I guess we’ll never know…
Everythingg
King-Over-Kingz
Based on what? Regular season stats ain’t the same as playoff stats.
