Shaq to Pippen "You were not the main focus of the 6 rings.Dont make me pull up the scouting report"

blackzeus

Superstar
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
21,666
Reputation
2,825
Daps
43,539
I'm just gon put this here instead of creating a new thread. Is there any way people can blame Kobe for not getting along with shaq after seeing how he behaves on tnt and petty shyt like this

You gettin' up at 3AM everyday to put in that work and this fatazz donut eatin' mothaf*cka thinks he deserves the ball more than you :childplease:
 

Bryan Danielson

Jmare007 x Bryan Danielson x JLova = King Ghidorah
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
107,036
Reputation
10,915
Daps
207,506
Reppin
#We Are The Flash #DOOMSET #LukeCageSet #NEWLWO
THIS TOPIC HAS BEEN BEAT TO DEATH, BUT ITS BEEN PROVEN THAT KOBE CARRIED THE LAKERS IN THE WESTERN CONFERENCE PLAYOFFS, WHILE SHAQ FEASTED ON THE WEAKER EASTERN CONFERENCE TEAMS DURING THE FINALS

2mq3v5i.jpg


ONLY A RETARD CALLS THIS "ROBIN" STATUS


WHOAAAA WHOOOAA!!! WHOOOAAA!!!

This "thecoli" the place where we constantly hate on everything Bron does and NEVER give him his just due credit!!

Sorry, I'm not prepared to give Kobe props for something Bron (& a few other Coli hates cats) been doing but can seem to get no love for cuz the common rhetoric be "who gives a fukk"?
 

Art Barr

INVADING SOHH CHAMPION
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
69,418
Reputation
14,031
Daps
96,464
Reppin
CHICAGO
He was GREAT but did he will them to the Finals like Shaq in 95? Come on...you got to be real here.


the phantom foul,....
stopped him from doing what Shaq got.to do.with Orlando.


Art Barr
 

Art Barr

INVADING SOHH CHAMPION
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
69,418
Reputation
14,031
Daps
96,464
Reppin
CHICAGO
True but the difference is Kareem would:

1. Get in foul trouble
2. Basically let Shaq score

Shaq couldn't guard Kareem but he would have a much better chance of slowing Kareem down then vice versa. How could any argue against that

Kareem.would have destroyed Shaq and never left him get to the low block.
plus, Shaq would have been in foul trouble against Kareem and Kareem was to high of an IQ player to let Shaq get deep block positioning to score consistently and would have hammered him on offense, by pedigree.

Art Barr
 

Art Barr

INVADING SOHH CHAMPION
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
69,418
Reputation
14,031
Daps
96,464
Reppin
CHICAGO
yeah, lets ignore that they would have had to also beat the Pacers in the ECF

:rudy:

the only issue in the off'a that year was ny.
which needed the most errant call after the no call on wilt goaltending van lier's j to win the title in game seven.


Art Barr
 

Sccit

LA'S MOST BLUNTED
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
58,283
Reputation
-19,910
Daps
77,314
Reppin
LOS818ANGELES
WHOAAAA WHOOOAA!!! WHOOOAAA!!!

This "thecoli" the place where we constantly hate on everything Bron does and NEVER give him his just due credit!!

Sorry, I'm not prepared to give Kobe props for something Bron (& a few other Coli hates cats) been doing but can seem to get no love for cuz the common rhetoric be "who gives a fukk"?



LEBRON NEVER DID ANYTHING REMOTELY CLOSE TO KOBE WINNING WITH PAU AS A SECOND FIDDLE
 

I.V.

Keep this Fire
Supporter
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
7,056
Reputation
2,220
Daps
17,747
:whoa::whoa::whoa::whoa::whoa::whoa::whoa::whoa::whoa:, just :whoa:

Wilt and Kareem have more points

Wilt, Kareem, Russell, and Olajuwon have more boards

Hakeem, Kareem, David Robinson, and Patrick Ewing have more blocks

Russell and Kareem have more rings.

So where does Shaq fit into this picture? :ohhh:


Well, seeing as you often have to adjust stats for era... counting stats for early centers don't really move me.

The argument is, who - at their best - was the best or most dominant player... And I think any sane basketball fan should be willing to say that a Prime Shaq is on part with Prime Wilt and Kareem, and certainly more dominant that David Robinson or Bill Russell. Bill Rusell was 6'9, 210 pounds. That's small forward size.
 

blackzeus

Superstar
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
21,666
Reputation
2,825
Daps
43,539
Well, seeing as you often have to adjust stats for era... counting stats for early centers don't really move me.

The argument is, who - at their best - was the best or most dominant player... And I think any sane basketball fan should be willing to say that a Prime Shaq is on part with Prime Wilt and Kareem, and certainly more dominant that David Robinson or Bill Russell. Bill Rusell was 6'9, 210 pounds. That's small forward size.

:laff: Shaq can't hit an 18' jumpshot and you saying he is on par with the #1 scorer ever and the man who scored 100 points in one game :heh:, negged for stupidity and lack of knowledge, and the appeal to majority fallacy. Big Ben was 6'9" 240 and owned Shaq in the finals
 
Last edited:

I.V.

Keep this Fire
Supporter
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
7,056
Reputation
2,220
Daps
17,747
Shaq can't hit an 18' jumpshot and you saying he is on par with the #1 scorer ever and the man who scored 100 points in one game :heh:, negged for stupidity and lack of knowledge, and the appeal to majority fallacy. Big Ben was 6'9" 240 and owned Shaq in the finals
:russ: @ you popping off at the lip, to an adult.


I actually think Shaq's career was a disappointment, and that his lack of defensive impact is embarrassing considering his rare gifts. He's not my GOAT by any means. I was responding to somebody... like yourself... who looks at counting stats from bygone eras and compares them to today's, as if the eras are the same. When everything from pace to the basic level of talent were wildly different.


I personally think Wilt would be dominant in any era. But I know he wouldn't be able to score 100 point today, for example.

And as far as 6'9/240 Ben Wallace "owning" shaq in the finals... you're talking about a finals where Shaq averaged 28 and 11 on like 65% shooting. :sas1: Study up.


You're like a child walking into a movie theater 45 minutes in... you have no context. I was responding to somebody trying to brush aside Shaq's dominance, rather than evaluate it and opt to choose somebody else. I don't think Shaq is the greatest center of all time...

But if you are picking a center at his PEAK, he has as good a claim as anyone. And who wants their fukking center (if I'm asking for the greatest ever) shooting 18 footers. :scust:


Go play 2k, kiddo.
 

blackzeus

Superstar
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
21,666
Reputation
2,825
Daps
43,539
:russ: @ you popping off at the lip, to an adult.


I actually think Shaq's career was a disappointment, and that his lack of defensive impact is embarrassing considering his rare gifts. He's not my GOAT by any means. I was responding to somebody... like yourself... who looks at counting stats from bygone eras and compares them to today's, as if the eras are the same. When everything from pace to the basic level of talent were wildly different.


I personally think Wilt would be dominant in any era. But I know he wouldn't be able to score 100 point today, for example.

And as far as 6'9/240 Ben Wallace "owning" shaq in the finals... you're talking about a finals where Shaq averaged 28 and 11 on like 65% shooting. :sas1: Study up.


You're like a child walking into a movie theater 45 minutes in... you have no context. I was responding to somebody trying to brush aside Shaq's dominance, rather than evaluate it and opt to choose somebody else. I don't think Shaq is the greatest center of all time...

But if you are picking a center at his PEAK, he has as good a claim as anyone. And who wants their fukking center (if I'm asking for the greatest ever) shooting 18 footers. :scust:


Go play 2k, kiddo.

1) So Kobe can score 81 in todays game but Wilt couldn't score 100 :laff:

2) Bill Russell would be doing the following x10:

 
Top