Sharks are older than trees.

Low End Derrick

Veteran
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
19,356
Reputation
7,384
Daps
85,215
The way the thread title is worded makes it seem like they’re talking about a single organism

Which is obviously absurd
 

Don Snow

Superstar
Joined
Dec 13, 2019
Messages
2,628
Reputation
951
Daps
14,577

Nkrumah Was Right

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
12,165
Reputation
1,994
Daps
35,525
in 20 years they could come out with a new study saying something completely different :unimpressed:

Fossil dating isn’t 100 percent accurate

fossil dating is just a “scientifically accepted theory” and it isn’t a fact

I thought y’all coli intellectuals knew that though :skip:

By "fossil dating" I'm assuming you're referring to radiocarbon dating? There are dozens of methods of chronological dating that scientists use.

:francis:

Radiocarbon dating is not a theory. It is a method. Which tells me that you're not really familiar with concepts like the scientific method or how archaeology works.
 

Don Snow

Superstar
Joined
Dec 13, 2019
Messages
2,628
Reputation
951
Daps
14,577
By "fossil dating" I'm assuming you're referring to radiocarbon dating? There are dozens of methods of chronological dating that scientists use.

:francis:

Radiocarbon dating is not a theory. It is a method. Which tells me that you're not really familiar with concepts like the scientific method or how archaeology works.
Radiocarbon dating is “scientifically accepted theory”

it isn’t necessarily a “fact”

Carbon dating beyond 50,000 years is hard to pinpoint anyway because the c14 left is usually less than 1 percent by that time
Look it up if you want :manny:
 
Last edited:

Phantum

The Charisma of the Streets
Joined
Jun 11, 2017
Messages
8,386
Reputation
1,711
Daps
39,404
in 20 years they could come out with a new study saying something completely different :unimpressed:

Fossil dating isn’t 100 percent accurate

fossil dating is just a “scientifically accepted theory” and it isn’t a fact

I thought y’all coli intellectuals knew that though :skip:

We all know what a theory and a hypothesis is. How do you think scientific discoveries are made?
 
Joined
May 22, 2012
Messages
44,208
Reputation
-6,122
Daps
49,310
Reppin
RENO, Nevada
in 20 years they could come out with a new study saying something completely different :unimpressed:

Fossil dating isn’t 100 percent accurate

fossil dating is just a “scientifically accepted theory” and it isn’t a fact

I thought y’all coli intellectuals knew that though :skip:

Creh posted this while singing along to drakes ghostwriters
 

Low End Derrick

Veteran
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
19,356
Reputation
7,384
Daps
85,215
Radiocarbon dating is “scientifically accepted theory”

it’s isn’t necessarily a “fact”

Carbon dating beyond 50,000 years is hard to pinpoint anyway because the c14 left is usually less than 1 percent by that time
Look it up if you want :manny:

What are the facts then?
 
Top