Sharks are older than trees.

[Cheese McNair]

For perspective, the modern crocodile is 83 million years old.

That’s why some of them huge ones basically look like dinosaurs

 

[Don Snow]

What are the facts then?

The fact is Fossil dating is a “scientifically accepted theory”


An article stating sharks are older than trees because of the current data but new found evidence can disprove that


Which is something that happens in the scientific field quite often


But all the “coli intellectuals” don’t seem to agree

 

[Low End Derrick]

The fact is Fossil dating is a “scientifically accepted theory”


An article stating sharks are older than trees because of the current data but new found evidence can disprove that


Which is something that happens in the scientific field quite often


But all the “coli intellectuals” don’t seem to agree

Do you have that?

 

[2 Up 2 Down]

in 20 years they could come out with a new study saying something completely different

Fossil dating isn’t 100 percent accurate

fossil dating is just a “scientifically accepted theory” and it isn’t a fact

I thought y’all coli intellectuals knew that though

You believe in the Bible and hate science because it pokes holes through that whole book.

 

[Wolfpac]

 

[RedCloakBlackWraithe]

25 years doesn’t seem that old unless you meant quarter million.

250yrs breh millenium is 1k years

 

[Don Snow]

Do you have that?

Lmao you really got me there breh can’t get nothing past this genius

You believe in the Bible and hate science because it pokes holes through that whole book.

Breh who are you? do you even know me to be making these assumptions



Breh brought up the Bible where did I start talking about religion everything I said in this thread is science based

 

[2 Up 2 Down]

Lmao you really got me there breh can’t get nothing past this genius


Breh who are you? do you even know me to be making these assumptions



Breh brought up the Bible where did I start talking about religion everything I said in this thread is science based

Religious believers are usually the ones to hold an anti-science view. What you are telling me that you are anti-science just for the sake of being stupid.

 

[Don Snow]

Religious believers are usually the ones to hold an anti-science view. What you are telling me that you are anti-science just for the sake of being stupid.

Where did I say anything that was anti science? do you lack comprehension?

 

[frush11]

The Ocean is the real outer Space. Shiit freaks me out

 

[Harry B]

Scientists and their “theories” and “hypotheses”

Agree, I only believe alt-science on Twitter

No scientist said this, a group of scientists said one thing about sharks. Other people another thing about trees. And nobody said nothing existed before that. If we are keeping it scientific, and not "fun fact of the day, for entertainment purposes" that is.

 

[2 Up 2 Down]

Radiocarbon dating is “scientifically accepted theory”

it isn’t necessarily a “fact”

Carbon dating beyond 50,000 years is hard to pinpoint anyway because the c14 left is usually less than 1 percent by that time
Look it up if you want

@Nkrumah Was Right already let you know that carbon dating is a method and you keep stating it is a theory.
The theory is the answer you get from the method which is carbon dating

 

[Don Snow]

@Nkrumah Was Right already let you know that carbon dating is a method and you keep stating it is a theory.
The theory is the answer you get from the method which is carbon dating

It’s a method based in theory



And it’s not 100 percent accurate

Is anything I said wrong?

I’m a humble guy i would actually appreciate some new knowledge on the subject

I just found it funny how sensationalized the thread title was

They found sharks older than the trees they found

This doesn’t actually prove sharks are older than trees because ultimately they don’t truly know and these are all scientific assumptions based on scientific methods that do work but are not 100 percent accurate

 

[2 Up 2 Down]

It’s a method based in theory



And it’s not 100 percent accurate

Is anything I said wrong?

I’m a humble guy i would actually appreciate some new knowledge on the subject

I just found it funny how sensationalized the thread title was

They found sharks older than the trees they found

This doesn’t actually prove sharks are older than trees because ultimately they don’t truly know and these are all scientific assumptions based on scientific methods that do work but are not 100 percent accurate

It was a hypothesis that was tested through a method that gave a theory