Your whole argument was dismantled, and now you're just talking nonsense. Inner city crime isn't some unique occurrence. Other communities hold people accountable, you say? I guess that's why crime is non-existent except in the inner city. You're a fukking joke.
On the 4th of July weekend Chicago had 60 shootings. Name one non-black community where that happens at, you fukkin' colonized idiot. These white cops are laughing at you idiots with your pants hanging down. Then you idiots wonder why financially stable black people gravitate away from you dumbasses.
Gang violence definitely needs to be tackled. Same with police violence against black folks.
Goku and Vegeta were the last of their race.
Nope.
A c00n is someone who speaks out against Pookie that will rob and kill you? Until there's accountability, within the black community, and individuals and held accountable for their deadly behavior toward other black people, it wont be safe no matter how much you try to defend Pookie and other losers who will just shoot or rob you for a few dollars regardless of you defending their reckless behavior in the black community.Goku and Vegeta were the last of their race.
Unfortunately for us we have more c00ns than just these two idiots
Nonsense wrapped in assumptions. Your whole argument is flawed because you're assuming black lives - across the board - aren't being valued. You assume this because you believe, for whatever reason, that it's not getting the same attention in black communities as BLM is for police violence. I showed you that this wrong and you ignored it. You're also ignoring the fact that criminals are, in the majority of cases, held accountable for the crimes they commit - the police aren't - which is why you see such a large outcry. You still sound like an ignorant white supremacists pretending to care about issues facing us. It's weird how you talk as if you outside or above us.
If black lives across the board were being value, then there would be a national movement among black Americans in the media as well as in the music to stop killing one another, but we don't see that.
Jamaica and Haiti are not in a first-world country where most of the world decisions are made and opportunities are plentiful. I don't care what type of businesses are in the hood because if it's not safe why would we want our daughters going to patronize those areas which means you're not going to have any clientele that's going to provide revenue.
You embarrass yourself with these talking points. Please don't act like you speak for all Black people because you do not. The reality is that crime, poverty, inequality and lack of economic opportunities are all interrelated. You fix economic inequality, you fix poverty, you give people economic opportunities and the crime rate will start to decrease.
When I was growing up, income inequality wasn’t yet a big issue, because the middle class was strong and the plutocracy fairly marginal. But there was a great deal of alarm over the troubles of the African-American community, where social disorder was on the rise even as explicit legal discrimination (although not de facto discrimination) was coming to an end. What was going on?
There were all kinds of theories, ranging from cultural hand-waving to claims that it was all because of welfare. But some people, notably William Julius Wilson, argued that the underlying cause was economic: good jobs, while still fairly plentiful in America as a whole, were disappearing from the urban centers where the A-A population was concentrated. And the social collapse, while real, followed from that underlying cause.
This story contained a clear prediction — namely, that if whites were to face a similar disappearance of opportunity, they would develop similar behavior patterns. And sure enough, with the hollowing out of the middle class, we saw (via Mark Thoma) what Kevin Williamson at National Review describes as
the welfare dependency, the drug and alcohol addiction, the family anarchy
And what is the lesson? Why, that poor whites are moral failures, and they should move to where there are opportunities (where?). It’s really extraordinary.
Oh, and lots of swipes at food stamps, welfare programs, disability insurance (which conservatives insist is riddled with fraud, despite lots of evidence to the contrary.)
It’s surely worth noting that other advanced countries, with much more generous welfare states, aren’t showing anything like the kind of social collapse we’re seeing in the U.S. heartland. Here’s Case and Deaton:
Why, it’s almost as if having a strong safety net leads to better, not worse, social health. Culture still matters: US Hispanics do a lot better than one might have expected. But the idea that somehow food stamps are why we’re breaking bad is utterly at odds with the evidence. (Just as an aside, since someone will bring it up: all of those other advanced economies are just as open to trade as we are — so whatever you think of free trade, it doesn’t necessarily cause social collapse.)
Anyway, the right’s inability to face up to the evidence on this front is … just like its inability to face up to evidence on any other front.
Before you start making claims you should read up on history. In 1967 President Johnson ordered The National Advisory Comission on Civil Disorders to investigate the cause of the race riots of the late 60s. I have quoted the introduction to their report below. Unsurprisingly, educated people who study these things for a living come to drastically different conclusions than you have.