Too much ego. I don't think Meyers would want to deal with Klutch on that level. Too much LeBron. Too much Rich Paul.
Lol that's not true imo
If steph gets his 4th chip this year, not only does he tie lebron in ring count, but
That won't be enough to put him ahead of course... but it opens the door again. What if next year, Poole and Kuminga make that leap, the team is healthy, and Curry gets out of his shooting slump? We forget that Curry is an MVP level player otherwise. It's NOT impossible that they repeat next year.
- It would be his 2nd non superteam ring without Durant
- He would have to go through a 2nd seed Grizzlies and 1st seed 64 win Suns team on the road
- All with Klay being "a shell of himself"
If that happens, you really don't think a discussion would be had?
Lol that's not true imo
If steph gets his 4th chip this year, not only does he tie lebron in ring count, but
That won't be enough to put him ahead of course... but it opens the door again. What if next year, Poole and Kuminga make that leap, the team is healthy, and Curry gets out of his shooting slump? We forget that Curry is an MVP level player otherwise. It's NOT impossible that they repeat next year.
- It would be his 2nd non superteam ring without Durant
- He would have to go through a 2nd seed Grizzlies and 1st seed 64 win Suns team on the road
- All with Klay being "a shell of himself"
If that happens, you really don't think a discussion would be had?
Lol that's not true imo
If steph gets his 4th chip this year, not only does he tie lebron in ring count, but
That won't be enough to put him ahead of course... but it opens the door again. What if next year, Poole and Kuminga make that leap, the team is healthy, and Curry gets out of his shooting slump? We forget that Curry is an MVP level player otherwise. It's NOT impossible that they repeat next year.
- It would be his 2nd non superteam ring without Durant
- He would have to go through a 2nd seed Grizzlies and 1st seed 64 win Suns team on the road
- All with Klay being "a shell of himself"
If that happens, you really don't think a discussion would be had?
You're ignoring Duncan's flaws. He only has 3 FMVPs, and he also had some so-so finals performances (07, wtf was that? 13 he was part of the choke against the Heat)This is what happens when people let Coli narratives guide their thinking instead of reality.
Duncan has a far more impressive resume than Steph does, and LeBron done passed Duncan two titles ago. It didn't matter that Duncan had 5 titles and Bron just 2, virtually everyone had LeBron ahead of Duncan and by 2016 it was literally everyone while it was still 5 titles to 3.
Let's say Steph gets two more titles and balls out in the process, picking up two Finals MVPs. Then he breaks into the Duncan discussion. In accolades Duncan would still be ahead (same MVPs, more Finals MVPs, more All-Defensive teams, more All-NBA and All-Star teams), but Steph would be legitimately in the discussion. Unfortunately Steph never carried his team to the same extent Duncan did because Steph was a weakness on the defensive side of the ball while Duncan absolutely carried his early title squads on both sides of the ball. Even on the offensive sides Steph had playoff weaknesses, no absolutely striking playoff run where he looked like an all-time GOAT. So Duncan probably still gets the nod.
And that's Duncan. He'd need binoculars to see Bron. No one is going to put Steph top-2 all-time, supplanting Bron and KAJ, just because he finally got his first or second Finals MVPs on a team good enough he could spend the first two playoff rounds coming off the bench.![]()
I think there's a chance. It'll make people reevaluate history a little bit.Even if the warriors win this year and next year with Steph winning back to back FMVP I still don't see him surpassing Bron on the alltime list.
Bron is seen as the 2nd best after MJ, I don’t believe Curry can do anything to get that high.
Bron averaged 3.07 dribbles per touch this year. That was 142nd in the NBA, lower than Steph (4.06 dribbles per touch) and Poole (3.51 dribbles per touch).
How little basketball have you watched to believe that Bron hasn't excelled in a player movement offense? The 2013 Heat were arguably his greatest team and their movement was fantastic.
Don't say shyt just because other people on The Coli told you it was true.
You're ignoring Duncan's flaws. He only has 3 FMVPs, and he also had some so-so finals performances (07, wtf was that? 13 he was part of the choke against the Heat)
03 is held up as this vaunted "carry job" but everyone ignores Dirk Nowitzki and Chris Webber getting hurt, and the Lakers being injured that year.
By 2013-2014, that was a full on ensemble, Duncan wasn't really head and shoulders above everyone else. He had a lot of offensive and defensive support at different stages.
No. He doesn't come near LeBron in statistics or accolades. Plus, LeBron was much more dominant over a longer period of time.Lol that's not true imo
If steph gets his 4th chip this year, not only does he tie lebron in ring count, but
That won't be enough to put him ahead of course... but it opens the door again. What if next year, Poole and Kuminga make that leap, the team is healthy, and Curry gets out of his shooting slump? We forget that Curry is an MVP level player otherwise. It's NOT impossible that they repeat next year.
- It would be his 2nd non superteam ring without Durant
- He would have to go through a 2nd seed Grizzlies and 1st seed 64 win Suns team on the road
- All with Klay being "a shell of himself"
If that happens, you really don't think a discussion would be had?
Aside from that, Duncan doesn't really have any strong playoff run either.
What do you consider dominant? Stats or rings? LeBron was diickrode since day one he sure as hell wasn't dominating.No. He doesn't come near LeBron in statistics or accolades. Plus, LeBron was much more dominant over a longer period of time.
It's a gap between the top 3 players oat and everyone else. You'd essentially need to be dominant from the day you stepped in the league AND be near your peak for a decade in order to warrant even being in the discussion, and that's not counting rings and other awards.
Steph doesn't have enough time.