Should Have Used A Black Bank - Lil Boosie Robbed By Capital One For $469,000

[Perfectson]

Unfortunately you're right. Boosie not the one to fukk wit.

 

[Perfectson]

You're talking about legally. If someone works at the bank they can hatch a plan and conspire to take money out of an account.

Bank tellers get arrested all the time for taking people's money. A good criminal can get away with anything.

money isn't hard to follow, if there was a transfer they can look up where it was transferred to.

He could look up his own transaction history and see a transfer, if the shyt is gone without a trash, something is wrong.

You just thin the man is a complete idiot because of his appearance when he's made more money than you and has dealt with more money than you ever will lmao.

You don't know shyt about banks, you will never even have a half a million.

The bank won't give him any information about his money, so yes they are telling him to fukk off.

They could easily give him an explanation but threaten to send him back to prison lol

fukk outta here, you the donkey of the day, broke ass nikka think he some kind of expect


Hackers still millions from banks, and the bank usually has to hold that bag because their security failed, and it's there fault, because money is suppose to be secure.

The fact they don't mention any transfers from anywhere or anybody logging into his account, something is wrong.

Let me respond to your pseduo-babble, you always come into threads (specifically financial ones ) spouting this black hebrew israelite bullshyt that makes no damn sense but imma struggle to stay motived to respond

1. a bank cannot take your money and say fukk off - off course we are talking about legally wtf else would we be talking about? illegally they can do whatever they want, but they will be caught, sued, and you will be made whole. There hasn't been an instance in mdoern times that an employee of a bank skimmed money and the person who got jacked wasn't made whole.

2. i don't think boosie is a complete idiot, i don't think he even handles his money, but he obviously made a few mistakes here and is trying to pressure the bank into making him whole. Which is what any rational person would do. we are a land of frivilous litigations.

3. if it was reported, then the feds have the information. Bank can't give him information ...what are they suppose to do tell him the bank account it went to. they handed it over to the police (if Boosie called them). I had someone try to open up a credit card in my name, it got stuck because i have special codes that need to be put in to open lines of credit under my name. Anyway, they wouldn't tell me who it was, the lady slipped up and gave me the street address and it was local but she wouldn't give me anything else. They can't do it, 1) because of privacy issues (criminals still have protection) 2) vigilante justice

4. exactly , when banks are at fault they pay up when it's hacked on their end. If they aren't hacked on their end and it's on the customers end, the recourse is on the customer. Banks will typically help out but they aren't gonna just cut a check and them hold the loss because ofcustomer negligence.

5. The fact htey don't mention any transfers...you only heard one side of the story!!!! lol. You in here like you know the full story. Boosie out here playiing yall, trying to pressure the bank .

6. that civil court shyt is also sounds like bullshyt because the statue of limitations is usually well past a year in most states its 5 years. More than likely there was no merit to the case and the judge decided it was a waste to pursue. Or Boosie just lying

None of what Boosie is saying adds up , but let you tell it and he out here with Johnny Cochrane

 

[Perfectson]

 

[Master Teacher]

Let me respond to your pseduo-babble, you always come into threads (specifically financial ones ) spouting this black hebrew israelite bullshyt that makes no damn sense but imma struggle to stay motived to respond

1. a bank cannot take your money and say fukk off - off course we are talking about legally wtf else would we be talking about? illegally they can do whatever they want, but they will be caught, sued, and you will be made whole. There hasn't been an instance in mdoern times that an employee of a bank skimmed money and the person who got jacked wasn't made whole.

2. i don't think boosie is a complete idiot, i don't think he even handles his money, but he obviously made a few mistakes here and is trying to pressure the bank into making him whole. Which is what any rational person would do. we are a land of frivilous litigations.

3. if it was reported, then the feds have the information. Bank can't give him information ...what are they suppose to do tell him the bank account it went to. they handed it over to the police (if Boosie called them). I had someone try to open up a credit card in my name, it got stuck because i have special codes that need to be put in to open lines of credit under my name. Anyway, they wouldn't tell me who it was, the lady slipped up and gave me the street address and it was local but she wouldn't give me anything else. They can't do it, 1) because of privacy issues (criminals still have protection) 2) vigilante justice

4. exactly , when banks are at fault they pay up when it's hacked on their end. If they aren't hacked on their end and it's on the customers end, the recourse is on the customer. Banks will typically help out but they aren't gonna just cut a check and them hold the loss because ofcustomer negligence.

5. The fact htey don't mention any transfers...you only heard one side of the story!!!! lol. You in here like you know the full story. Boosie out here playiing yall, trying to pressure the bank .

6. that civil court shyt is also sounds like bullshyt because the statue of limitations is usually well past a year in most states its 5 years. More than likely there was no merit to the case and the judge decided it was a waste to pursue. Or Boosie just lying

None of what Boosie is saying adds up , but let you tell it and he out here with Johnny Cochrane

You typed all that bullshyt for nothing, who said anything about hebrew israelites

no modern instance of bank teller stealing money lmao it happens all the time you fukking moron

Not only bank tellers but Bankers themselves steal from members ALL THE TIME, there's too many incidents to even list

Who said the Feds were involved anywhere, where does it say that, once again you are making up shyt to support your dumb as views.

Boosie been awaiting for a year because he thinking everything is being worked out, ain't no Feds told him about an investigation lmao or the goddamn bank because there was no investigation.
I know somebody locked up right now for taking 100,000 grand from somebody's account and it took years for them to get caught

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/29/n...ng-atm-cards-to-steal-from-accounts.html?_r=0

The banks only have to pay, when they get sued by businesses who can afford to sue them, that's how they were paid back from having their accounts hacked lmao

The banks didn't do it because they wanted to, it was court ordered

you have no clue what you are talking about, another bum yapping with no real life experience.

 

[Rawster]

Bank does not have Mr. Boosies money, point blank period
if they were hacked they would have recouped Mr Boosies money
the fact that he's the only one complaining means, they weren't hacked and someone had authorized details to his account, even still typically banks will recoup said money
the fact bank isn't recouping money, after a year, means they find something fishy and perhaps extreme negligence on Mr. Boosies part.

FDIC /federally insured only means if the bank defaults , it doesn't cover hacking (another instance of you not knowing what you're talking about).

Regardless, Bank has and is still investigating...and Mr. Boosie should have gotten his lawyers involved Day 1.

if someone hacked the banks = banks fault
if someone hacks Mr Boosie terminal = Mr Boosie fault

point blank period, end of fukkin discussion.

Lastly, there's probably some arbitration process going on, which is why it's taking a year for Mr. Boosie...

I went through everyone of your examples and proved none of them are of banks stealing money, which you said initially. I asked for clear examples of banks stealing money, you did not provide 1 instance of that. If you want to correct yourself and change your allegations, you should do so at this time...because you're the one whose going to get checked mericlessly by someone who actually understand the propsition of the banks and can actually speak fluently about them. I'm not some regular idiot poster who shakes his pitchfork at any sign of witchcraftery. You really are over your head on this discussion, you do not know 1 iota about banking ...

So come again...

I know nothing about banking.

OK put your account where your mouth is tough guy. Wanna have a ban bet that I can show more than 5 different accounts at different banks internationally with at least 6 figures in them if you can? We can include a note on a bank to bank transfer with our usernames in the notes and one who cannot has to have their account banned.

You ready to prove I know nothing about banking and you're the expert?

@Brooklynzson @houston911

 

[Perfectson]

I know nothing about banking.

OK put your account where your mouth is tough guy. Wanna have a ban bet that I can show more than 5 different accounts at different banks internationally with at least 6 figures in them if you can? We can include a note on a bank to bank transfer with our usernames in the notes and one who cannot has to have their account banned.

You ready to prove I know nothing about banking and you're the expert?

@Brooklynzson @houston911

how does that prove you know more about banking, because you can photoshop better than me? I don't get it

how about we post our work credentials and the one with the least amount of financial credentials and degrees gets the ban?

 

[ZEB WALTON]

fukk capital one. made my inrest jump 30% outta nowhere.

i just stopped paying them. my credit sucks but fukk it. cash rules everything around me

 

[Perfectson]

You typed all that bullshyt for nothing, who said anything about hebrew israelites

no modern instance of bank teller stealing money lmao it happens all the time you fukking moron

Not only bank tellers but Bankers themselves steal from members ALL THE TIME, there's too many incidents to even list

Who said the Feds were involved anywhere, where does it say that, once again you are making up shyt to support your dumb as views.

Boosie been awaiting for a year because he thinking everything is being worked out, ain't no Feds told him about an investigation lmao or the goddamn bank because there was no investigation.
I know somebody locked up right now for taking 100,000 grand from somebody's account and it took years for them to get caught

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/29/n...ng-atm-cards-to-steal-from-accounts.html?_r=0

The banks only have to pay, when they get sued by businesses who can afford to sue them, that's how they were paid back from having their accounts hacked lmao

The banks didn't do it because they wanted to, it was court ordered

you have no clue what you are talking about, another bum yapping with no real life experience.

your so easy to argue with, because you just argue yourself into circles

i said this

There hasn't been an instance in mdoern times that an employee of a bank skimmed money and the person who got jacked wasn't made whole.

then you followed with this

no modern instance of bank teller stealing money lmao it happens all the time you fukking moron

lets disregard that you failed to properly quote the context of what i was saying - the fact that i never siad that bank tellers never steal money yet you posted it like i said it. then you totally left out the underline part, which is what we are arguing, that Boosie didn't get recoup and there's no precedent of a bank teller stealing money from bank customer and the bank customer not being recouped. NONE!

Who said the Feds were involved anywhere, where does it say that, once again you are making up shyt to support your dumb as views.

because it's a federal crime...so if this was reported to the bank they would have had to call local economic crimes division and the FBI (if they were hacked or a hack was done) most local divisions don't have the resources to handle hacking cases.

The banks only have to pay, when they get sued by businesses who can afford to sue them, that's how they were paid back from having their accounts hacked lmao

The banks didn't do it because they wanted to, it was court ordered

you're completely and utterly wrong

did you even read the article, i'm getting tired of you you and this other poster, posting bullshyt links that have nothing to do with what you're arguing.

the article you posted was about people using deadd peoples accounts and basically creating fake profiles for dead people (with full power of attorney) and abusing the fact the accounts didn't have beneficiaries and defrauding social security. it says nothing about using active accounts and the law suit was a ciminal one not a civil one necessary to recoup any of the money.

if someone steals your identity and is able to get money out of your account, how is that the banks fault? if you had a twin brother and he stole your SS card, id, passports, and birth certificates and went on a shopping spree by taking money out of your accountg, do you really think you're going to be made whole on that? he stole your shyt, just like if it was money in your safe. No one is recouping you for that by the way, if you have money in a safe and someone steals it, its gone.

The whole point is that fraud happens and if its on the banks end, the bank pays, if it's on the customers end the customer pays. Point blank period, you saying otherwise is bullshyt

 

[GnauzBookOfRhymes]

I've never had a problem recouping after fraudulent charges appear. But then again they weren't for no damn 469k. Only thing I can think of is that it may not have been reported until many months after the charges cleared. I wonder if capital one is going to respond. What If they got Samuel Jackson to post a response

 

[ZEupTWN]

seems like boosie got bad azz management skills

 

[Master Teacher]

your so easy to argue with, because you just argue yourself into circles

i said this



then you followed with this


lets disregard that you failed to properly quote the context of what i was saying - the fact that i never siad that bank tellers never steal money yet you posted it like i said it. then you totally left out the underline part, which is what we are arguing, that Boosie didn't get recoup and there's no precedent of a bank teller stealing money from bank customer and the bank customer not being recouped. NONE!



because it's a federal crime...so if this was reported to the bank they would have had to call local economic crimes division and the FBI (if they were hacked or a hack was done) most local divisions don't have the resources to handle hacking cases.




you're completely and utterly wrong

did you even read the article, i'm getting tired of you you and this other poster, posting bullshyt links that have nothing to do with what you're arguing.

the article you posted was about people using deadd peoples accounts and basically creating fake profiles for dead people (with full power of attorney) and abusing the fact the accounts didn't have beneficiaries and defrauding social security. it says nothing about using active accounts and the law suit was a ciminal one not a civil one necessary to recoup any of the money.

if someone steals your identity and is able to get money out of your account, how is that the banks fault? if you had a twin brother and he stole your SS card, id, passports, and birth certificates and went on a shopping spree by taking money out of your accountg, do you really think you're going to be made whole on that? he stole your shyt, just like if it was money in your safe. No one is recouping you for that by the way, if you have money in a safe and someone steals it, its gone.

The whole point is that fraud happens and if its on the banks end, the bank pays, if it's on the customers end the customer pays. Point blank period, you saying otherwise is bullshyt

Once again you've wasted your life typing a bunch of bullshyt.

1 I'm not arguing with you, you are arguing with yoursel.

2. Boosie never reported as a fraud until after year, that was his problem, he kept thinking the bank was going to fix the issue and they kept spinning it

so the feds were never involved in the first place, he should've sued them from the beginning.

3. Your broke.

 

[Perfectson]

Once again you've wasted your life typing a bunch of bullshyt.

1 I'm not arguing with you, you are arguing with yoursel.

2. Boosie never reported as a fraud until after year, that was his problem, he kept thinking the bank was going to fix the issue and they kept spinning it

so the feds were never involved in the first place, he should've sued them from the beginning.

3. Your broke.

he doesn't report it to the feds

the bank does, they usually do the investigation on your behalf and help you through the process. They would have gotten the feds involved, otherwise they would have been negligent on their end (noting they were privy to the crime)

come on dude, i'm giving you facts on everything you stated.

I could be broke, but that doesn't change FACTS

 

[Prodigital]

3. if it was reported, then the feds have the information. Bank can't give him information ...what are they suppose to do tell him the bank account it went to. they handed it over to the police (if Boosie called them). I had someone try to open up a credit card in my name, it got stuck because i have special codes that need to be put in to open lines of credit under my name. Anyway, they wouldn't tell me who it was, the lady slipped up and gave me the street address and it was local but she wouldn't give me anything else. They can't do it, 1) because of privacy issues (criminals still have protection) 2) vigilante justice

Hold up on this point breh, if the feds are the only ones that can help wouldn't that mean boosie would have to snitch on his bank?
Boosie ain't no snitch breh

Spoiler

street logic

 

[Master Teacher]

he doesn't report it to the feds

the bank does, they usually do the investigation on your behalf and help you through the process. They would have gotten the feds involved, otherwise they would have been negligent on their end (noting they were privy to the crime)

come on dude, i'm giving you facts on everything you stated.

I could be broke, but that doesn't change FACTS

You moron, they won't call the feds unless he Boosie says it was fraud, he kept trusting the bank and they were spinning him, did you even read what he stated you idiot.

Federal law says that if someone takes money from your bank account you will get all of your money back if you notify your financial institution within 60 days after the fraudulent transaction appears on your bank statement.

They kept spinning him so he would be shyt out of luck.

Your an entire stance was that people who worked at the bank were beyond stealing and they aren't, the people who get caught aren't in the minority to those who don't, that's the hard reality. They finessed that man out his bread

 

[Citi Trends]

damn, this must have been done by the worst race(blacks). right???